Research Articles

Chronology methods and PhD-style articles.

A public shelf for thesis-style writing, chronology methodology, source ladders, Bible corpus integration, and evidence handling.

Research should be readable enough to invite review and careful enough to avoid pretending all evidence is equal.

Article shelf

The research work now has a public index

These are visitor-safe abstracts of the major research lanes. Full publication should happen article by article after review, citation cleanup, and sensitive-path removal.

Method Thesis

Computational Chronometry: The 100K+ Methods Thesis

A framework for using thousands of independent computational dating signals instead of leaning only on a few manually selected historical anchors.

  • Lexical and statistical chronology markers
  • Institutional, demographic, technological, and environmental signals
  • Convergence math as a chronology review method
Chronology Method

Chronology Dating Methodology

A summary of what worked in the David chronology and Battle of Kadesh workorders: careful sourcing, evidence lanes, and quality over quantity.

  • Four-lane evidence convergence
  • Battle, archaeology, material culture, and cross-civilization support
  • Warnings against low-confidence multiplier expansion
Source Ladder

Chronology Source Ladder

A ranking method for chronology sources based on active runtime use, direct derivation, structured date payloads, reproducible provenance, and low interpretive drift.

  • Separates active artifacts from archived synthesis
  • Names why a source ranks higher or lower
  • Protects the public work from treating every artifact as equally authoritative
Bible Corpus

Bible Corpus Integration Summary

A practical write-up of the Bible corpus utilities: Targum and BibleLua loading, reference normalization, missing-reference checks, and repeatable study workflows.

  • Supports Targum and BibleLua paths
  • Normalizes references across naming variants
  • Reduces missing-reference failures in chronology work
How to read this work

A public article should be reviewable

The next pass should turn each abstract into its own article page with citations, definitions, caveats, and a plain-language summary.

Scroll to Top