Apologetics Bible

1Chronicles 1:1

Hebrew

אָדָם שֵׁת אֱנֽוֹשׁ׃

'adam-shet-'envosh

KJV: Adam, Sheth, Enosh,

AKJV: Adam, Sheth, Enosh,

ASV: Adam, Seth, Enosh,

YLT: Adam, Sheth, Enosh,

Exposition: 1Chronicles 1:1 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Adam, Sheth, Enosh,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 1:2

Hebrew

קֵינָן מַהֲלַלְאֵל יָֽרֶד׃

qeynan-mahalale'el-yared

KJV: Kenan, Mahalaleel, Jered,

AKJV: Kenan, Mahalaleel, Jered,

ASV: Kenan, Mahalalel, Jared,

YLT: Kenan, Mahalaleel, Jered,

Exposition: 1Chronicles 1:2 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Kenan, Mahalaleel, Jered,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 1:3

Hebrew

חֲנוֹךְ מְתוּשֶׁלַח לָֽמֶךְ׃

chanvokhe-metvshelach-lamekhe

KJV: Henoch, Methuselah, Lamech,

AKJV: Henoch, Methuselah, Lamech,

ASV: Enoch, Methuselah, Lamech,

YLT: Henoch, Methuselah, Lamech,

Exposition: 1Chronicles 1:3 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Henoch, Methuselah, Lamech,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 1:4

Hebrew

נֹחַ שֵׁם חָם וָיָֽפֶת׃

nocha-shem-cham-vayafet

KJV: Noah, Shem, Ham, and Japheth.

AKJV: Noah, Shem, Ham, and Japheth. ¶

ASV: Noah, Shem, Ham, and Japheth.

YLT: Noah, Shem, Ham, and Japheth.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 1:4 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Noah, Shem, Ham, and Japheth.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 1:5

Hebrew

בְּנֵי יֶפֶת גֹּמֶר וּמָגוֹג וּמָדַי וְיָוָן וְתֻבָל וּמֶשֶׁךְ וְתִירָֽס׃

veney-yefet-gomer-vmagvog-vmaday-veyavan-vetuval-vmeshekhe-vetiyras

KJV: The sons of Japheth; Gomer, and Magog, and Madai, and Javan, and Tubal, and Meshech, and Tiras.

AKJV: The sons of Japheth; Gomer, and Magog, and Madai, and Javan, and Tubal, and Meshech, and Tiras.

ASV: The sons of Japheth: Gomer, and Magog, and Madai, and Javan, and Tubal, and Meshech, and Tiras.

YLT: Sons of Japheth: Gomer and Magog, and Madai, and Javan, and Tubal, and Meshech, and Tiras.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 1:5 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'The sons of Japheth; Gomer, and Magog, and Madai, and Javan, and Tubal, and Meshech, and Tiras.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 1:6

Hebrew

וּבְנֵי גֹּמֶר אַשְׁכֲּנַז וְדִיפַת וְתוֹגַרְמָֽה׃

vveney-gomer-'ashekhanaz-vediyfat-vetvogaremah

KJV: And the sons of Gomer; Ashchenaz, and Riphath, and Togarmah.

AKJV: And the sons of Gomer; Ashchenaz, and Riphath, and Togarmah.

ASV: And the sons of Gomer: Ashkenaz, and Diphath, and Togarmah.

YLT: And sons of Gomer: Ashchenaz, and Riphath, and Togarmah.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 1:6 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And the sons of Gomer; Ashchenaz, and Riphath, and Togarmah.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 1:7

Hebrew

וּבְנֵי יָוָן אֱלִישָׁה וְתַרְשִׁישָׁה כִּתִּים וְרוֹדָנִֽים׃

vveney-yavan-'eliyshah-vetareshiyshah-khitiym-vervodaniym

KJV: And the sons of Javan; Elishah, and Tarshish, Kittim, and Dodanim.

AKJV: And the sons of Javan; Elishah, and Tarshish, Kittim, and Dodanim. ¶

ASV: And the sons of Javan: Elishah, and Tarshish, Kittim, and Rodanim.

YLT: And sons of Javan: Elisha, and Tarshishah, Kittim, and Dodanim.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 1:7 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And the sons of Javan; Elishah, and Tarshish, Kittim, and Dodanim.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 1:8

Hebrew

בְּנֵי חָם כּוּשׁ וּמִצְרַיִם פּוּט וּכְנָֽעַן׃

veney-cham-khvsh-vmitzerayim-fvt-vkhena'an

KJV: The sons of Ham; Cush, and Mizraim, Put, and Canaan.

AKJV: The sons of Ham; Cush, and Mizraim, Put, and Canaan.

ASV: The sons of Ham: Cush, and Mizraim, Put, and Canaan.

YLT: Sons of Ham: Cush, and Mizraim, Put, and Canaan.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 1:8 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'The sons of Ham; Cush, and Mizraim, Put, and Canaan.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 1:9

Hebrew

וּבְנֵי כוּשׁ סְבָא וַחֲוִילָה וְסַבְתָּא וְרַעְמָא וְסַבְתְּכָא וּבְנֵי רַעְמָא שְׁבָא וּדְדָֽן׃

vveney-khvsh-seva'-vachaviylah-vesaveta'-vera'ema'-vesavetekha'-vveney-ra'ema'-sheva'-vdedan

KJV: And the sons of Cush; Seba, and Havilah, and Sabta, and Raamah, and Sabtecha. And the sons of Raamah; Sheba, and Dedan.

AKJV: And the sons of Cush; Seba, and Havilah, and Sabta, and Raamah, and Sabtecha. And the sons of Raamah; Sheba, and Dedan.

ASV: And the sons of Cush: Seba, and Havilah, and Sabta, and Raama, and Sabteca. And the sons of Raamah: Sheba, and Dedan.

YLT: And sons of Cush: Seba and Havilah, and Sabta, and Raamah, and Sabtecka. And sons of Raamah: Sheba and Dedan.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 1:9 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And the sons of Cush; Seba, and Havilah, and Sabta, and Raamah, and Sabtecha. And the sons of Raamah; Sheba, and Dedan.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 1:10

Hebrew

וְכוּשׁ יָלַד אֶת־נִמְרוֹד הוּא הֵחֵל לִהְיוֹת גִּבּוֹר בָּאָֽרֶץ׃

vekhvsh-yalad-'et-nimervod-hv'-hechel-liheyvot-givvor-va'aretz

KJV: And Cush begat Nimrod: he began to be mighty upon the earth.

AKJV: And Cush begat Nimrod: he began to be mighty on the earth.

ASV: And Cush begat Nimrod; he began to be a mighty one in the earth.

YLT: And Cush begat Nimrod: he began to be a mighty one in the land.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 1:10 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Cush begat Nimrod: he began to be mighty upon the earth.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 1:11

Hebrew

וּמִצְרַיִם יָלַד אֶת־לודיים לוּדִים וְאֶת־עֲנָמִים וְאֶת־לְהָבִים וְאֶת־נַפְתֻּחִֽים׃

vmitzerayim-yalad-'et-lvdyym-lvdiym-ve'et-'anamiym-ve'et-lehaviym-ve'et-nafetuchiym

KJV: And Mizraim begat Ludim, and Anamim, and Lehabim, and Naphtuhim,

AKJV: And Mizraim begat Ludim, and Anamim, and Lehabim, and Naphtuhim,

ASV: And Mizraim begat Ludim, and Anamim, and Lehabim, and Naphtuhim,

YLT: And Mizraim begat the Ludim, and the Anamim, and the Lehabim, and the Naphtuhim,

Exposition: 1Chronicles 1:11 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Mizraim begat Ludim, and Anamim, and Lehabim, and Naphtuhim,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 1:12

Hebrew

וְֽאֶת־פַּתְרֻסִים וְאֶת־כַּסְלֻחִים אֲשֶׁר יָצְאוּ מִשָּׁם פְּלִשְׁתִּים וְאֶת־כַּפְתֹּרִֽים׃

ve'et-faterusiym-ve'et-khaseluchiym-'asher-yatze'v-misham-felishetiym-ve'et-khafetoriym

KJV: And Pathrusim, and Casluhim, (of whom came the Philistines,) and Caphthorim.

AKJV: And Pathrusim, and Casluhim, (of whom came the Philistines,) and Caphthorim.

ASV: and Pathrusim, and Casluhim (from whence came the Philistines), and Caphtorim.

YLT: and the Pathrusim, and the Casluhim (from whom came out the Philistim), and the Caphtorim.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 1:12 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Pathrusim, and Casluhim, (of whom came the Philistines,) and Caphthorim.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 1:13

Hebrew

וּכְנַעַן יָלַד אֶת־צִידוֹן בְּכֹרוֹ וְאֶת־חֵֽת׃

vkhena'an-yalad-'et-tziydvon-vekhorvo-ve'et-chet

KJV: And Canaan begat Zidon his firstborn, and Heth,

AKJV: And Canaan begat Zidon his firstborn, and Heth,

ASV: And Canaan begat Sidon his first-born, and Heth,

YLT: And Canaan begat Zidon his first born, and Heth,

Exposition: 1Chronicles 1:13 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Canaan begat Zidon his firstborn, and Heth,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 1:14

Hebrew

וְאֶת־הַיְבוּסִי וְאֶת־הָאֱמֹרִי וְאֵת הַגִּרְגָּשִֽׁי׃

ve'et-hayevvsiy-ve'et-ha'emoriy-ve'et-hagiregashiy

KJV: The Jebusite also, and the Amorite, and the Girgashite,

AKJV: The Jebusite also, and the Amorite, and the Girgashite,

ASV: and the Jebusite, and the Amorite, and the Girgashite,

YLT: and the Jebusite, and the Amorite, and the Girgashite,

Exposition: 1Chronicles 1:14 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'The Jebusite also, and the Amorite, and the Girgashite,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 1:15

Hebrew

וְאֶת־הַחִוִּי וְאֶת־הֽ͏ַעַרְקִי וְאֶת־הַסִּינִֽי׃

ve'et-hachiviy-ve'et-ha'areqiy-ve'et-hasiyniy

KJV: And the Hivite, and the Arkite, and the Sinite,

AKJV: And the Hivite, and the Arkite, and the Sinite,

ASV: and the Hivite, and the Arkite, and the Sinite,

YLT: and the Hivite, and the Arkite, and the Sinite,

Exposition: 1Chronicles 1:15 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And the Hivite, and the Arkite, and the Sinite,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 1:16

Hebrew

וְאֶת־הָאַרְוָדִי וְאֶת־הַצְּמָרִי וְאֶת־הֽ͏ַחֲמָתִֽי׃

ve'et-ha'arevadiy-ve'et-hatzemariy-ve'et-hachamatiy

KJV: And the Arvadite, and the Zemarite, and the Hamathite.

AKJV: And the Arvadite, and the Zemarite, and the Hamathite. ¶

ASV: and the Arvadite, and the Zemarite, and the Hamathite.

YLT: and the Arvadite, and the Zemarite, and the Hamathite.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 1:16 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And the Arvadite, and the Zemarite, and the Hamathite.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 1:17

Hebrew

בְּנֵי שֵׁם עֵילָם וְאַשּׁוּר וְאַרְפַּכְשַׁד וְלוּד וַאֲרָם וְעוּץ וְחוּל וְגֶתֶר וָמֶֽשֶׁךְ׃

veney-shem-'eylam-ve'ashvr-ve'arefakheshad-velvd-va'aram-ve'vtz-vechvl-vegeter-vameshekhe

KJV: The sons of Shem; Elam, and Asshur, and Arphaxad, and Lud, and Aram, and Uz, and Hul, and Gether, and Meshech.

AKJV: The sons of Shem; Elam, and Asshur, and Arphaxad, and Lud, and Aram, and Uz, and Hul, and Gether, and Meshech.

ASV: The sons of Shem: Elam, and Asshur, and Arpachshad, and Lud, and Aram, and Uz, and Hul, and Gether, and Meshech.

YLT: Sons of Shem: Elam and Asshur, and Arphaxad, and Lud, and Aram, and Uz, and Hul, and Gether, and Meshech.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 1:17 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'The sons of Shem; Elam, and Asshur, and Arphaxad, and Lud, and Aram, and Uz, and Hul, and Gether, and Meshech.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 1:18

Hebrew

וְאַרְפַּכְשַׁד יָלַד אֶת־שָׁלַח וְשֶׁלַח יָלַד אֶת־עֵֽבֶר׃

ve'arefakheshad-yalad-'et-shalach-veshelach-yalad-'et-'ever

KJV: And Arphaxad begat Shelah, and Shelah begat Eber.

AKJV: And Arphaxad begat Shelah, and Shelah begat Eber.

ASV: And Arpachshad begat Shelah, and Shelah begat Eber.

YLT: And Arphaxad begat Shelah, and Shelah begat Eber.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 1:18 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Arphaxad begat Shelah, and Shelah begat Eber.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 1:19

Hebrew

וּלְעֵבֶר יֻלַּד שְׁנֵי בָנִים שֵׁם הָאֶחָד פֶּלֶג כִּי בְיָמָיו נִפְלְגָה הָאָרֶץ וְשֵׁם אָחִיו יָקְטָֽן׃

vle'ever-yulad-sheney-vaniym-shem-ha'echad-feleg-khiy-veyamayv-nifelegah-ha'aretz-veshem-'achiyv-yaqetan

KJV: And unto Eber were born two sons: the name of the one was Peleg; because in his days the earth was divided: and his brother’s name was Joktan.

AKJV: And to Eber were born two sons: the name of the one was Peleg; because in his days the earth was divided: and his brother’s name was Joktan.

ASV: And unto Eber were born two sons: the name of the one was Peleg; for in his days the earth was divided; and his brother’s name was Joktan.

YLT: And to Eber have been born two sons, the name of the one is Peleg, for in his days hath the land been divided, and the name of his brother is Joktan.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 1:19 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And unto Eber were born two sons: the name of the one was Peleg; because in his days the earth was divided: and his brother’s name was Joktan.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 1:20

Hebrew

וְיָקְטָן יָלַד אֶת־אַלְמוֹדָד וְאֶת־שָׁלֶף וְאֶת־חֲצַרְמָוֶת וְאֶת־יָֽרַח׃

veyaqetan-yalad-'et-'alemvodad-ve'et-shalef-ve'et-chatzaremavet-ve'et-yarach

KJV: And Joktan begat Almodad, and Sheleph, and Hazarmaveth, and Jerah,

AKJV: And Joktan begat Almodad, and Sheleph, and Hazarmaveth, and Jerah,

ASV: And Joktan begat Almodad, and Sheleph, and Hazarmaveth, and Jerah,

YLT: And Joktan begat Almodad, and Sheleph, and Hazarmaveth, and Jerah,

Exposition: 1Chronicles 1:20 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Joktan begat Almodad, and Sheleph, and Hazarmaveth, and Jerah,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 1:21

Hebrew

וְאֶת־הֲדוֹרָם וְאֶת־אוּזָל וְאֶת־דִּקְלָֽה׃

ve'et-hadvoram-ve'et-'vzal-ve'et-diqelah

KJV: Hadoram also, and Uzal, and Diklah,

AKJV: Hadoram also, and Uzal, and Diklah,

ASV: and Hadoram, and Uzal, and Diklah,

YLT: and Hadoram, and Uzal, and Diklah,

Exposition: 1Chronicles 1:21 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Hadoram also, and Uzal, and Diklah,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 1:22

Hebrew

וְאֶת־עֵיבָל וְאֶת־אֲבִימָאֵל וְאֶת־שְׁבָֽא׃

ve'et-'eyval-ve'et-'aviyma'el-ve'et-sheva'

KJV: And Ebal, and Abimael, and Sheba,

AKJV: And Ebal, and Abimael, and Sheba,

ASV: and Ebal, and Abimael, and Sheba,

YLT: and Ebal, and Abimael, and Sheba,

Exposition: 1Chronicles 1:22 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Ebal, and Abimael, and Sheba,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 1:23

Hebrew

וְאֶת־אוֹפִיר וְאֶת־חֲוִילָה וְאֶת־יוֹבָב כָּל־אֵלֶּה בְּנֵי יָקְטָֽן׃

ve'et-'vofiyr-ve'et-chaviylah-ve'et-yvovav-khal-'eleh-veney-yaqetan

KJV: And Ophir, and Havilah, and Jobab. All these were the sons of Joktan.

AKJV: And Ophir, and Havilah, and Jobab. All these were the sons of Joktan. ¶

ASV: and Ophir, and Havilah, and Jobab. All these were the sons of Joktan.

YLT: and Ophir, and Havilah, and Jobab; all these are sons of Joktan.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 1:23 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Ophir, and Havilah, and Jobab. All these were the sons of Joktan.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 1:24

Hebrew

שֵׁם ׀ אַרְפַּכְשַׁד שָֽׁלַח׃

shem- -'arefakheshad-shalach

KJV: Shem, Arphaxad, Shelah,

AKJV: Shem, Arphaxad, Shelah,

ASV: Shem, Arpachshad, Shelah,

YLT: Shem, Arphaxad, Shelah,

Exposition: 1Chronicles 1:24 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Shem, Arphaxad, Shelah,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 1:25

Hebrew

עֵבֶר פֶּלֶג רְעֽוּ׃

'ever-feleg-re'v

KJV: Eber, Peleg, Reu,

AKJV: Eber, Peleg, Reu,

ASV: Eber, Peleg, Reu,

YLT: Eber, Peleg, Reu,

Exposition: 1Chronicles 1:25 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Eber, Peleg, Reu,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 1:26

Hebrew

שְׂרוּג נָחוֹר תָּֽרַח׃

shervg-nachvor-tarach

KJV: Serug, Nahor, Terah,

AKJV: Serug, Nahor, Terah,

ASV: Serug, Nahor, Terah,

YLT: Serug, Nahor, Terah,

Exposition: 1Chronicles 1:26 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Serug, Nahor, Terah,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 1:27

Hebrew

אַבְרָם הוּא אַבְרָהָֽם׃

'averam-hv'-'averaham

KJV: Abram; the same is Abraham.

AKJV: Abram; the same is Abraham.

ASV: Abram (the same is Abraham).

YLT: Abram--he is Abraham.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 1:27 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Abram; the same is Abraham.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 1:28

Hebrew

בְּנֵי אַבְרָהָם יִצְחָק וְיִשְׁמָעֵֽאל׃

veney-'averaham-yitzechaq-veyishema'e'l

KJV: The sons of Abraham; Isaac, and Ishmael.

AKJV: The sons of Abraham; Isaac, and Ishmael. ¶

ASV: The sons of Abraham: Isaac, and Ishmael.

YLT: Sons of Abraham: Isaac and Ishmael.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 1:28 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'The sons of Abraham; Isaac, and Ishmael.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 1:29

Hebrew

אֵלֶּה תֹּלְדוֹתָם בְּכוֹר יִשְׁמָעֵאל נְבָיוֹת וְקֵדָר וְאַדְבְּאֵל וּמִבְשָֽׂם׃

'eleh-toledvotam-vekhvor-yishema'e'l-nevayvot-veqedar-ve'adeve'el-vmivesham

KJV: These are their generations: The firstborn of Ishmael, Nebaioth; then Kedar, and Adbeel, and Mibsam,

AKJV: These are their generations: The firstborn of Ishmael, Nebaioth; then Kedar, and Adbeel, and Mibsam,

ASV: These are their generations: the first-born of Ishmael, Nebaioth; then Kedar, and Adbeel, and Mibsam,

YLT: These are their generations: first-born of Ishmael, Nebaioth, and Kedar, and Adheel, and Mibsam,

Exposition: 1Chronicles 1:29 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'These are their generations: The firstborn of Ishmael, Nebaioth; then Kedar, and Adbeel, and Mibsam,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 1:30

Hebrew

מִשְׁמָע וְדוּמָה מַשָּׂא חֲדַד וְתֵימָֽא׃

mishema'-vedvmah-masha'-chadad-veteyma'

KJV: Mishma, and Dumah, Massa, Hadad, and Tema,

AKJV: Mishma, and Dumah, Massa, Hadad, and Tema,

ASV: Mishma, and Dumah, Massa, Hadad, and Tema,

YLT: Mishma, and Dumah, Massa, Hadad, and Tema,

Exposition: 1Chronicles 1:30 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Mishma, and Dumah, Massa, Hadad, and Tema,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 1:31

Hebrew

יְטוּר נָפִישׁ וָקֵדְמָה אֵלֶּה הֵם בְּנֵי יִשְׁמָעֵֽאל׃

yetvr-nafiysh-vaqedemah-'eleh-hem-veney-yishema'e'l

KJV: Jetur, Naphish, and Kedemah. These are the sons of Ishmael.

AKJV: Jetur, Naphish, and Kedemah. These are the sons of Ishmael. ¶

ASV: Jetur, Naphish, and Kedemah. These are the sons of Ishmael.

YLT: Jetur, Naphish, and Kedema. These are sons of Ishmael.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 1:31 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Jetur, Naphish, and Kedemah. These are the sons of Ishmael.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 1:32

Hebrew

וּבְנֵי קְטוּרָה פִּילֶגֶשׁ אַבְרָהָם יָלְדָה אֶת־זִמְרָן וְיָקְשָׁן וּמְדָן וּמִדְיָן וְיִשְׁבָּק וְשׁוּחַ וּבְנֵי יָקְשָׁן שְׁבָא וּדְדָֽן׃

vveney-qetvrah-fiylegesh-'averaham-yaledah-'et-zimeran-veyaqeshan-vmedan-vmideyan-veyishevaq-veshvcha-vveney-yaqeshan-sheva'-vdedan

KJV: Now the sons of Keturah, Abraham’s concubine: she bare Zimran, and Jokshan, and Medan, and Midian, and Ishbak, and Shuah. And the sons of Jokshan; Sheba, and Dedan.

AKJV: Now the sons of Keturah, Abraham’s concubine: she bore Zimran, and Jokshan, and Medan, and Midian, and Ishbak, and Shuah. And the sons of Jokshan; Sheba, and Dedan.

ASV: And the sons of Keturah, Abraham’s concubine: she bare Zimran, and Jokshan, and Medan, and Midian, and Ishbak, and Shuah. And the sons of Jokshan: Sheba, and Dedan.

YLT: And sons of Keturah, Abraham's concubine: she bare Zimran, and Jokshan, and Medan, and Midian, and Ishbak, and Shuah. And sons of Jokshan: Sheba and Dedan.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 1:32 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Now the sons of Keturah, Abraham’s concubine: she bare Zimran, and Jokshan, and Medan, and Midian, and Ishbak, and Shuah. And the sons of Jokshan; Sheba, and Dedan.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 1:33

Hebrew

וּבְנֵי מִדְיָן עֵיפָה וָעֵפֶר וַחֲנוֹךְ וַאֲבִידָע וְאֶלְדָּעָה כָּל־אֵלֶּה בְּנֵי קְטוּרָֽה׃

vveney-mideyan-'eyfah-va'efer-vachanvokhe-va'aviyda'-ve'eleda'ah-khal-'eleh-veney-qetvrah

KJV: And the sons of Midian; Ephah, and Epher, and Henoch, and Abida, and Eldaah. All these are the sons of Keturah.

AKJV: And the sons of Midian; Ephah, and Epher, and Henoch, and Abida, and Eldaah. All these are the sons of Keturah.

ASV: And the sons of Midian: Ephah, and Epher, and Hanoch, and Abida, and Eldaah. All these were the sons of Keturah.

YLT: And sons of Midian: Ephah and Epher, and Henoch, and Abida, and Eldaah; all these are sons of Keturah.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 1:33 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And the sons of Midian; Ephah, and Epher, and Henoch, and Abida, and Eldaah. All these are the sons of Keturah.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 1:34

Hebrew

וַיּוֹלֶד אַבְרָהָם אֶת־יִצְחָק בְּנֵי יִצְחָק עֵשָׂו וְיִשְׂרָאֵֽל׃

vayvoled-'averaham-'et-yitzechaq-veney-yitzechaq-'eshav-veyishera'el

KJV: And Abraham begat Isaac. The sons of Isaac; Esau and Israel.

AKJV: And Abraham begat Isaac. The sons of Isaac; Esau and Israel. ¶

ASV: And Abraham begat Isaac. The sons of Isaac: Esau, and Israel.

YLT: And Abraham begetteth Isaac. Sons of Isaac: Esau and Israel.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 1:34 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Abraham begat Isaac. The sons of Isaac; Esau and Israel.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 1:35

Hebrew

בְּנֵי עֵשָׂו אֱלִיפַז רְעוּאֵל וִיעוּשׁ וְיַעְלָם וְקֹֽרַח׃

veney-'eshav-'eliyfaz-re'v'el-viy'vsh-veya'elam-veqorach

KJV: The sons of Esau; Eliphaz, Reuel, and Jeush, and Jaalam, and Korah.

AKJV: The sons of Esau; Eliphaz, Reuel, and Jeush, and Jaalam, and Korah.

ASV: The sons of Esau: Eliphaz, Reuel, and Jeush, and Jalam, and Korah.

YLT: Sons of Esau: Eliphaz, Reuel, and Jeush, and Jaalam, and Korah.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 1:35 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'The sons of Esau; Eliphaz, Reuel, and Jeush, and Jaalam, and Korah.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 1:36

Hebrew

בְּנֵי אֱלִיפָז תֵּימָן וְאוֹמָר צְפִי וְגַעְתָּם קְנַז וְתִמְנָע וַעֲמָלֵֽק׃

veney-'eliyfaz-teyman-ve'vomar-tzefiy-vega'etam-qenaz-vetimena'-va'amaleq

KJV: The sons of Eliphaz; Teman, and Omar, Zephi, and Gatam, Kenaz, and Timna, and Amalek.

AKJV: The sons of Eliphaz; Teman, and Omar, Zephi, and Gatam, Kenaz, and Timna, and Amalek.

ASV: The sons of Eliphaz: Teman, and Omar, Zephi, and Gatam, Kenaz, and Timna, and Amalek.

YLT: Sons of Eliphaz: Teman, and Omar, Zephi, and Gatam, Kenaz, and Timna, and Amalek.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 1:36 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'The sons of Eliphaz; Teman, and Omar, Zephi, and Gatam, Kenaz, and Timna, and Amalek.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 1:37

Hebrew

בְּנֵי רְעוּאֵל נַחַת זֶרַח שַׁמָּה וּמִזָּֽה׃

veney-re'v'el-nachat-zerach-shamah-vmizah

KJV: The sons of Reuel; Nahath, Zerah, Shammah, and Mizzah.

AKJV: The sons of Reuel; Nahath, Zerah, Shammah, and Mizzah.

ASV: The sons of Reuel: Nahath, Zerah, Shammah, and Mizzah.

YLT: Sons of Reuel: Nahath, Zerah, Shammah, and Mizzah.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 1:37 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'The sons of Reuel; Nahath, Zerah, Shammah, and Mizzah.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 1:38

Hebrew

וּבְנֵי שֵׂעִיר לוֹטָן וְשׁוֹבָל וְצִבְעוֹן וֽ͏ַעֲנָה וְדִישֹׁן וְאֵצֶר וְדִישָֽׁן׃

vveney-she'iyr-lvotan-veshvoval-vetzive'von-va'anah-vediyshon-ve'etzer-vediyshan

KJV: And the sons of Seir; Lotan, and Shobal, and Zibeon, and Anah, and Dishon, and Ezer, and Dishan.

AKJV: And the sons of Seir; Lotan, and Shobal, and Zibeon, and Anah, and Dishon, and Ezar, and Dishan.

ASV: And the sons of Seir: Lotan, and Shobal, and Zibeon, and Anah, and Dishon, and Ezer, and Dishan.

YLT: And sons of Seir: Lotan, and Shobal, and Zibeon, and Anah, and Dishon, and Ezar, and Dishan.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 1:38 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And the sons of Seir; Lotan, and Shobal, and Zibeon, and Anah, and Dishon, and Ezer, and Dishan.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 1:39

Hebrew

וּבְנֵי לוֹטָן חֹרִי וְהוֹמָם וַאֲחוֹת לוֹטָן תִּמְנָֽע׃

vveney-lvotan-choriy-vehvomam-va'achvot-lvotan-timena'

KJV: And the sons of Lotan; Hori, and Homam: and Timna was Lotan’s sister.

AKJV: And the sons of Lotan; Hori, and Homam: and Timna was Lotan’s sister.

ASV: And the sons of Lotan: Hori, and Homam; and Timna was Lotan’s sister.

YLT: And sons of Lotan: Hori and Homam, and sister of Lotan is Timna.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 1:39 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And the sons of Lotan; Hori, and Homam: and Timna was Lotan’s sister.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 1:40

Hebrew

בְּנֵי שׁוֹבָל עַלְיָן וּמָנַחַת וְעֵיבָל שְׁפִי וְאוֹנָם וּבְנֵי צִבְעוֹן אַיָּה וַעֲנָֽה׃

veney-shvoval-'aleyan-vmanachat-ve'eyval-shefiy-ve'vonam-vveney-tzive'von-'ayah-va'anah

KJV: The sons of Shobal; Alian, and Manahath, and Ebal, Shephi, and Onam. And the sons of Zibeon; Aiah, and Anah.

AKJV: The sons of Shobal; Alian, and Manahath, and Ebal, Shephi, and Onam. and the sons of Zibeon; Aiah, and Anah.

ASV: The sons of Shobal: Alian, and Manahath, and Ebal, Shephi, and Onam. And the sons of Zibeon: Aiah, and Anah.

YLT: Sons of Shobal: Alian, and Manahath, and Ebal, Shephi, and Onam. And sons of Zideon: Aiah and Anah.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 1:40 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'The sons of Shobal; Alian, and Manahath, and Ebal, Shephi, and Onam. And the sons of Zibeon; Aiah, and Anah.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 1:41

Hebrew

בְּנֵי עֲנָה דִּישׁוֹן וּבְנֵי דִישׁוֹן חַמְרָן וְאֶשְׁבָּן וְיִתְרָן וּכְרָֽן׃

veney-'anah-diyshvon-vveney-diyshvon-chameran-ve'eshevan-veyiteran-vkheran

KJV: The sons of Anah; Dishon. And the sons of Dishon; Amram, and Eshban, and Ithran, and Cheran.

AKJV: The sons of Anah; Dishon. And the sons of Dishon; Amram, and Eshban, and Ithran, and Cheran.

ASV: The sons of Anah: Dishon. And the sons of Dishon: Hamran, and Eshban, and Ithran, and Cheran.

YLT: The sons of Anah: Dishon. and sons of Dishon: Amram, and Eshban, and Ithran, and Cheran.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 1:41 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'The sons of Anah; Dishon. And the sons of Dishon; Amram, and Eshban, and Ithran, and Cheran.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 1:42

Hebrew

בְּֽנֵי־אֵצֶר בִּלְהָן וְזַעֲוָן יַעֲקָן בְּנֵי דִישׁוֹן עוּץ וַאֲרָֽן׃

veney-'etzer-vilehan-veza'avan-ya'aqan-veney-diyshvon-'vtz-va'aran

KJV: The sons of Ezer; Bilhan, and Zavan, and Jakan. The sons of Dishan; Uz, and Aran.

AKJV: The sons of Ezer; Bilhan, and Zavan, and Jakan. The sons of Dishan; Uz, and Aran. ¶

ASV: The sons of Ezer: Bilhan, and Zaavan, Jaakan. The sons of Dishan: Uz, and Aran.

YLT: Sons of Ezer: Bilhan, and Zavan, Jakan. Sons of Dishan: Uz and Aran.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 1:42 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'The sons of Ezer; Bilhan, and Zavan, and Jakan. The sons of Dishan; Uz, and Aran.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 1:43

Hebrew

וְאֵלֶּה הַמְּלָכִים אֲשֶׁר מָלְכוּ בְּאֶרֶץ אֱדוֹם לִפְנֵי מְלָךְ־מֶלֶךְ לִבְנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל בֶּלַע בֶּן־בְּעוֹר וְשֵׁם עִירוֹ דִּנְהָֽבָה׃

ve'eleh-hamelakhiym-'asher-malekhv-ve'eretz-'edvom-lifeney-melakhe-melekhe-liveney-yishera'el-vela'-ven-ve'vor-veshem-'iyrvo-dinehavah

KJV: Now these are the kings that reigned in the land of Edom before any king reigned over the children of Israel; Bela the son of Beor: and the name of his city was Dinhabah.

AKJV: Now these are the kings that reigned in the land of Edom before any king reigned over the children of Israel; Bela the son of Beor: and the name of his city was Dinhabah.

ASV: Now these are the kings that reigned in the land of Edom, before there reigned any king over the children of Israel: Bela the son of Beor; and the name of his city was Dinhabah.

YLT: And these are the kings who reigned in the land of Edom before the reigning of a king of the sons of Israel: Bela son of Beor, and the name of his city is Dinhabah.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 1:43 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Now these are the kings that reigned in the land of Edom before any king reigned over the children of Israel; Bela the son of Beor: and the name of his city was Dinhabah.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 1:44

Hebrew

וַיָּמָת בָּלַע וַיִּמְלֹךְ תַּחְתָּיו יוֹבָב בֶּן־זֶרַח מִבָּצְרָֽה׃

vayamat-vala'-vayimelokhe-tachetayv-yvovav-ven-zerach-mivatzerah

KJV: And when Bela was dead, Jobab the son of Zerah of Bozrah reigned in his stead.

AKJV: And when Bela was dead, Jobab the son of Zerah of Bozrah reigned in his stead.

ASV: And Bela died, and Jobab the son of Zerah of Bozrah reigned in his stead.

YLT: And Bela dieth, and reign in his stead doth Jobab son of Zerah from Bozrali;

Exposition: 1Chronicles 1:44 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And when Bela was dead, Jobab the son of Zerah of Bozrah reigned in his stead.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 1:45

Hebrew

וַיָּמָת יוֹבָב וַיִּמְלֹךְ תַּחְתָּיו חוּשָׁם מֵאֶרֶץ הַתֵּימָנִֽי׃

vayamat-yvovav-vayimelokhe-tachetayv-chvsham-me'eretz-hateymaniy

KJV: And when Jobab was dead, Husham of the land of the Temanites reigned in his stead.

AKJV: And when Jobab was dead, Husham of the land of the Temanites reigned in his stead.

ASV: And Jobab died, and Husham of the land of the Temanites reigned in his stead.

YLT: and Jobab dieth, and reign in his stead doth Husham from the land of the Temanite;

Exposition: 1Chronicles 1:45 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And when Jobab was dead, Husham of the land of the Temanites reigned in his stead.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 1:46

Hebrew

וַיָּמָת חוּשָׁם וַיִּמְלֹךְ תַּחְתָּיו הֲדַד בֶּן־בְּדַד הַמַּכֶּה אֶת־מִדְיָן בִּשְׂדֵה מוֹאָב וְשֵׁם עִירוֹ עיות עֲוִֽית׃

vayamat-chvsham-vayimelokhe-tachetayv-hadad-ven-vedad-hamakheh-'et-mideyan-vishedeh-mvo'av-veshem-'iyrvo-'yvt-'aviyt

KJV: And when Husham was dead, Hadad the son of Bedad, which smote Midian in the field of Moab, reigned in his stead: and the name of his city was Avith.

AKJV: And when Husham was dead, Hadad the son of Bedad, which smote Midian in the field of Moab, reigned in his stead: and the name of his city was Avith.

ASV: And Husham died, and Hadad the son of Bedad, who smote Midian in the field of Moab, reigned in his stead; and the name of his city was Avith.

YLT: and Husham dieth, and reign in his stead doth Hadad, son of Bedad (who smiteth Midian in the field of Moab) and the name of his city is Avith;

Exposition: 1Chronicles 1:46 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And when Husham was dead, Hadad the son of Bedad, which smote Midian in the field of Moab, reigned in his stead: and the name of his city was Avith.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 1:47

Hebrew

וַיָּמָת הֲדָד וַיִּמְלֹךְ תַּחְתָּיו שַׂמְלָה מִמַּשְׂרֵקָֽה׃

vayamat-hadad-vayimelokhe-tachetayv-shamelah-mimashereqah

KJV: And when Hadad was dead, Samlah of Masrekah reigned in his stead.

AKJV: And when Hadad was dead, Samlah of Masrekah reigned in his stead.

ASV: And Hadad died, and Samlah of Masrekah reigned in his stead.

YLT: and Hadad dieth, and reign in his stead doth Samlah from Masrekah;

Exposition: 1Chronicles 1:47 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And when Hadad was dead, Samlah of Masrekah reigned in his stead.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 1:48

Hebrew

וַיָּמָת שַׂמְלָה וַיִּמְלֹךְ תַּחְתָּיו שָׁאוּל מֵרְחֹבוֹת הַנָּהָֽר׃

vayamat-shamelah-vayimelokhe-tachetayv-sha'vl-merechovvot-hanahar

KJV: And when Samlah was dead, Shaul of Rehoboth by the river reigned in his stead.

AKJV: And when Samlah was dead, Shaul of Rehoboth by the river reigned in his stead.

ASV: And Samlah died, and Shaul of Rehoboth by the River reigned in his stead.

YLT: and Samlah dieth, and reign in his stead doth Shaul from Rehoboth of the River;

Exposition: 1Chronicles 1:48 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And when Samlah was dead, Shaul of Rehoboth by the river reigned in his stead.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 1:49

Hebrew

וַיָּמָת שָׁאוּל וַיִּמְלֹךְ תַּחְתָּיו בַּעַל חָנָן בֶּן־עַכְבּֽוֹר׃

vayamat-sha'vl-vayimelokhe-tachetayv-va'al-chanan-ven-'akhevvor

KJV: And when Shaul was dead, Baal–hanan the son of Achbor reigned in his stead.

AKJV: And when Shaul was dead, Baalhanan the son of Achbor reigned in his stead.

ASV: And Shaul died, and Baal-hanan the son of Achbor reigned in his stead.

YLT: and Shaul dieth, and reign in his stead doth Baal-Hanan son of Achbor;

Exposition: 1Chronicles 1:49 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And when Shaul was dead, Baal–hanan the son of Achbor reigned in his stead.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 1:50

Hebrew

וַיָּמָת בַּעַל חָנָן וַיִּמְלֹךְ תַּחְתָּיו הֲדַד וְשֵׁם עִירוֹ פָּעִי וְשֵׁם אִשְׁתּוֹ מְהֵיטַבְאֵל בַּת־מַטְרֵד בַּת מֵי זָהָֽב׃

vayamat-va'al-chanan-vayimelokhe-tachetayv-hadad-veshem-'iyrvo-fa'iy-veshem-'ishetvo-meheytave'el-vat-matered-vat-mey-zahav

KJV: And when Baal–hanan was dead, Hadad reigned in his stead: and the name of his city was Pai; and his wife’s name was Mehetabel, the daughter of Matred, the daughter of Mezahab.

AKJV: And when Baalhanan was dead, Hadad reigned in his stead: and the name of his city was Pai; and his wife’s name was Mehetabel, the daughter of Matred, the daughter of Mezahab. ¶

ASV: And Baal-hanan died, and Hadad reigned in his stead; and the name of his city was Pai: and his wife’s name was Mehetabel, the daughter of Matred, the daughter of Me-zahab.

YLT: and Baal-Hanan dieth, and reign in his stead doth Hadad, and the name of his city is Pai, and the name of his wife is Mehetabel daughter of Matred, daughter of Me-Zahab; Hadad also dieth.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 1:50 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And when Baal–hanan was dead, Hadad reigned in his stead: and the name of his city was Pai; and his wife’s name was Mehetabel, the daughter of Matred, the daughter of Mezahab.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 1:51

Hebrew

וַיָּמָת הֲדָד וַיִּהְיוּ אַלּוּפֵי אֱדוֹם אַלּוּף תִּמְנָע אַלּוּף עליה עַֽלְוָה אַלּוּף יְתֵֽת׃

vayamat-hadad-vayiheyv-'alvfey-'edvom-'alvf-timena'-'alvf-'lyh-'alevah-'alvf-yetet

KJV: Hadad died also. And the dukes of Edom were; duke Timnah, duke Aliah, duke Jetheth,

AKJV: Hadad died also. And the dukes of Edom were; duke Timnah, duke Aliah, duke Jetheth,

ASV: And Hadad died. And the chiefs of Edom were: chief Timna, chief Aliah, chief Jetheth,

YLT: And chiefs of Edom are: chief Timnah, chief Aliah, chief Jetheth,

Exposition: 1Chronicles 1:51 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Hadad died also. And the dukes of Edom were; duke Timnah, duke Aliah, duke Jetheth,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 1:52

Hebrew

אַלּוּף אָהֳלִיבָמָה אַלּוּף אֵלָה אַלּוּף פִּינֹֽן׃

'alvf-'aholiyvamah-'alvf-'elah-'alvf-fiynon

KJV: Duke Aholibamah, duke Elah, duke Pinon,

AKJV: Duke Aholibamah, duke Elah, duke Pinon,

ASV: chief Oholibamah, chief Elah, chief Pinon,

YLT: chief Aholibamah, chief Elah, chief Pinon,

Exposition: 1Chronicles 1:52 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Duke Aholibamah, duke Elah, duke Pinon,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 1:53

Hebrew

אַלּוּף קְנַז אַלּוּף תֵּימָן אַלּוּף מִבְצָֽר׃

'alvf-qenaz-'alvf-teyman-'alvf-mivetzar

KJV: Duke Kenaz, duke Teman, duke Mibzar,

AKJV: Duke Kenaz, duke Teman, duke Mibzar,

ASV: chief Kenaz, chief Teman, chief Mibzar,

YLT: chief Kenaz, chief Teman, chief Mibzar,

Exposition: 1Chronicles 1:53 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Duke Kenaz, duke Teman, duke Mibzar,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 1:54

Hebrew

אַלּוּף מַגְדִּיאֵל אַלּוּף עִירָם אֵלֶּה אַלּוּפֵי אֱדֽוֹם׃

'alvf-magediy'el-'alvf-'iyram-'eleh-'alvfey-'edvom

KJV: Duke Magdiel, duke Iram. These are the dukes of Edom.

AKJV: Duke Magdiel, duke Iram. These are the dukes of Edom.

ASV: chief Magdiel, chief Iram. These are the chiefs of Edom.

YLT: chief Magdiel, chief Iram. These are chiefs of Edom.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 1:54 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Duke Magdiel, duke Iram. These are the dukes of Edom.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.