Apologetics Bible

1Chronicles 2:1

Hebrew

אֵלֶּה בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל רְאוּבֵן שִׁמְעוֹן לֵוִי וִיהוּדָה יִשָׂשכָר וּזְבֻלֽוּן׃

'eleh-veney-yishera'el-re'vven-shime'von-leviy-viyhvdah-yishashkhar-vzevulvn

KJV: These are the sons of Israel; Reuben, Simeon, Levi, and Judah, Issachar, and Zebulun,

AKJV: These are the sons of Israel; Reuben, Simeon, Levi, and Judah, Issachar, and Zebulun,

ASV: These are the sons of Israel: Reuben, Simeon, Levi, and Judah, Issachar, and Zebulun,

YLT: These are sons of Israel: Reuben, Simeon, Levi, and Judah, Issachar, and Zebulun,

Exposition: 1Chronicles 2:1 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'These are the sons of Israel; Reuben, Simeon, Levi, and Judah, Issachar, and Zebulun,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 2:2

Hebrew

דָּן יוֹסֵף וּבִנְיָמִן נַפְתָּלִי גָּד וְאָשֵֽׁר׃

dan-yvosef-vvineyamin-nafetaliy-gad-ve'asher

KJV: Dan, Joseph, and Benjamin, Naphtali, Gad, and Asher.

AKJV: Dan, Joseph, and Benjamin, Naphtali, Gad, and Asher. ¶

ASV: Dan, Joseph, and Benjamin, Naphtali, Gad, and Asher.

YLT: Dan, Joseph, and Benjamin, Naphtali, Gad, and Asher.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 2:2 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Dan, Joseph, and Benjamin, Naphtali, Gad, and Asher.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 2:3

Hebrew

בְּנֵי יְהוּדָה עֵר וְאוֹנָן וְשֵׁלָה שְׁלוֹשָׁה נוֹלַד לוֹ מִבַּת־שׁוּעַ הַֽכְּנַעֲנִית וַיְהִי עֵר ׀ בְּכוֹר יְהוּדָה רַע בְּעֵינֵי יְהוָה וַיְמִיתֵֽהוּ׃

veney-yehvdah-'er-ve'vonan-veshelah-shelvoshah-nvolad-lvo-mivat-shv'a-hakhena'aniyt-vayehiy-'er- -vekhvor-yehvdah-ra'-ve'eyney-yehvah-vayemiytehv

KJV: The sons of Judah; Er, and Onan, and Shelah: which three were born unto him of the daughter of Shua the Canaanitess. And Er, the firstborn of Judah, was evil in the sight of the LORD; and he slew him.

AKJV: The sons of Judah; Er, and Onan, and Shelah: which three were born to him of the daughter of Shua the Canaanitess. And Er, the firstborn of Judah, was evil in the sight of the LORD; and he slew him.

ASV: The sons of Judah: Er, and Onan, and Shelah; which three were born unto him of Shua’s daughter the Canaanitess. And Er, Judah’s first-born, was wicked in the sight of Jehovah; and he slew him.

YLT: Sons of Judah: Er, and Onan, and Shelah, three have been born to him of a daughter of Shua the Canaanitess. And Er, first-born of Judah, is evil in the eyes of Jehovah, and He putteth him to death.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 2:3 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'The sons of Judah; Er, and Onan, and Shelah: which three were born unto him of the daughter of Shua the Canaanitess. And Er, the firstborn of Judah, was evil in the sight of the LORD; and he slew him.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 2:4

Hebrew

וְתָמָר כַּלָּתוֹ יָלְדָה לּוֹ אֶת־פֶּרֶץ וְאֶת־זָרַח כָּל־בְּנֵי יְהוּדָה חֲמִשָּֽׁה׃

vetamar-khalatvo-yaledah-lvo-'et-feretz-ve'et-zarach-khal-veney-yehvdah-chamishah

KJV: And Tamar his daughter in law bare him Pharez and Zerah. All the sons of Judah were five.

AKJV: And Tamar his daughter in law bore him Pharez and Zerah. All the sons of Judah were five.

ASV: And Tamar his daughter-in-law bare him Perez and Zerah. All the sons of Judah were five.

YLT: And Tamar his daughter-in-law hath borne to him Pharez and Zerah. All the sons of Judah are five.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 2:4 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Tamar his daughter in law bare him Pharez and Zerah. All the sons of Judah were five.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 2:5

Hebrew

בְּנֵי־פֶרֶץ חֶצְרוֹן וְחָמֽוּל׃

veney-feretz-chetzervon-vechamvl

KJV: The sons of Pharez; Hezron, and Hamul.

AKJV: The sons of Pharez; Hezron, and Hamul.

ASV: The sons of Perez: Hezron, and Hamul.

YLT: Sons of Pharez: Hezron, and Hamul.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 2:5 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'The sons of Pharez; Hezron, and Hamul.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 2:6

Hebrew

וּבְנֵי זֶרַח זִמְרִי וְאֵיתָן וְהֵימָן וְכַלְכֹּל וָדָרַע כֻּלָּם חֲמִשָּֽׁה׃

vveney-zerach-zimeriy-ve'eytan-veheyman-vekhalekhol-vadara'-khulam-chamishah

KJV: And the sons of Zerah; Zimri, and Ethan, and Heman, and Calcol, and Dara: five of them in all.

AKJV: And the sons of Zerah; Zimri, and Ethan, and Heman, and Calcol, and Dara: five of them in all.

ASV: And the sons of Zerah: Zimri, and Ethan, and Heman, and Calcol, and Dara; five of them in all.

YLT: And sons of Zerah: Zimri, and Ethan, and Heman, and Calcol, and Dara; all of them five.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 2:6 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And the sons of Zerah; Zimri, and Ethan, and Heman, and Calcol, and Dara: five of them in all.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 2:7

Hebrew

וּבְנֵי כַּרְמִי עָכָר עוֹכֵר יִשְׂרָאֵל אֲשֶׁר מָעַל בַּחֵֽרֶם׃

vveney-kharemiy-'akhar-'vokher-yishera'el-'asher-ma'al-vacherem

KJV: And the sons of Carmi; Achar, the troubler of Israel, who transgressed in the thing accursed.

AKJV: And the sons of Carmi; Achar, the troubler of Israel, who transgressed in the thing accursed.

ASV: And the sons of Carmi: Achar, the troubler of Israel, who committed a trespass in the devoted thing.

YLT: And sons of Carmi: Achar, troubler of Israel, who trespassed in the devoted thing.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 2:7 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And the sons of Carmi; Achar, the troubler of Israel, who transgressed in the thing accursed.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 2:8

Hebrew

וּבְנֵי אֵיתָן עֲזַרְיָֽה׃

vveney-'eytan-'azareyah

KJV: And the sons of Ethan; Azariah.

AKJV: And the sons of Ethan; Azariah.

ASV: And the sons of Ethan: Azariah.

YLT: And sons of Ethan: Azariah.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 2:8 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And the sons of Ethan; Azariah.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 2:9

Hebrew

וּבְנֵי חֶצְרוֹן אֲשֶׁר נוֹלַד־לוֹ אֶת־יְרַחְמְאֵל וְאֶת־רָם וְאֶת־כְּלוּבָֽי׃

vveney-chetzervon-'asher-nvolad-lvo-'et-yeracheme'el-ve'et-ram-ve'et-khelvvay

KJV: The sons also of Hezron, that were born unto him; Jerahmeel, and Ram, and Chelubai.

AKJV: The sons also of Hezron, that were born to him; Jerahmeel, and Ram, and Chelubai.

ASV: The sons also of Hezron, that were born unto him: Jerahmeel, and Ram, and Chelubai.

YLT: And sons of Hezron who were born to him; Jerahmeel, and Ram, and Chelubai.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 2:9 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'The sons also of Hezron, that were born unto him; Jerahmeel, and Ram, and Chelubai.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 2:10

Hebrew

וְרָם הוֹלִיד אֶת־עַמִּינָדָב וְעַמִּינָדָב הוֹלִיד אֶת־נַחְשׁוֹן נְשִׂיא בְּנֵי יְהוּדָֽה׃

veram-hvoliyd-'et-'amiynadav-ve'amiynadav-hvoliyd-'et-nacheshvon-neshiy'-veney-yehvdah

KJV: And Ram begat Amminadab; and Amminadab begat Nahshon, prince of the children of Judah;

AKJV: And Ram begat Amminadab; and Amminadab begat Nahshon, prince of the children of Judah;

ASV: And Ram begat Amminadab, and Amminadab begat Nahshon, prince of the children of Judah;

YLT: And Ram begat Amminadab, and Amminadab begat Nahshon, prince of the sons of Judah;

Exposition: 1Chronicles 2:10 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Ram begat Amminadab; and Amminadab begat Nahshon, prince of the children of Judah;'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 2:11

Hebrew

וְנַחְשׁוֹן הוֹלִיד אֶת־שַׂלְמָא וְשַׂלְמָא הוֹלִיד אֶת־בֹּֽעַז׃

venacheshvon-hvoliyd-'et-shalema'-veshalema'-hvoliyd-'et-vo'az

KJV: And Nahshon begat Salma, and Salma begat Boaz,

AKJV: And Nahshon begat Salma, and Salma begat Boaz,

ASV: and Nahshon begat Salma, and Salma begat Boaz,

YLT: and Nahshon begat Salma, and Salma begat Boaz,

Exposition: 1Chronicles 2:11 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Nahshon begat Salma, and Salma begat Boaz,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 2:12

Hebrew

וּבֹעַז הוֹלִיד אֶת־עוֹבֵד וְעוֹבֵד הוֹלִיד אֶת־יִשָֽׁי׃

vvo'az-hvoliyd-'et-'voved-ve'voved-hvoliyd-'et-yishay

KJV: And Boaz begat Obed, and Obed begat Jesse,

AKJV: And Boaz begat Obed, and Obed begat Jesse, ¶

ASV: and Boaz begat Obed, and Obed begat Jesse;

YLT: and Boaz begat Obed, and Obed begat Jesse;

Exposition: 1Chronicles 2:12 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Boaz begat Obed, and Obed begat Jesse,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 2:13

Hebrew

וְאִישַׁי הוֹלִיד אֶת־בְּכֹרוֹ אֶת־אֱלִיאָב וַאֲבִינָדָב הַשֵּׁנִי וְשִׁמְעָא הַשְּׁלִישִֽׁי׃

ve'iyshay-hvoliyd-'et-vekhorvo-'et-'eliy'av-va'aviynadav-hasheniy-veshime'a'-hasheliyshiy

KJV: And Jesse begat his firstborn Eliab, and Abinadab the second, and Shimma the third,

AKJV: And Jesse begat his firstborn Eliab, and Abinadab the second, and Shimma the third,

ASV: and Jesse begat his first-born Eliab, and Abinadab the second, and Shimea the third,

YLT: and Jesse begat his first-born Eliab, and Abinadab the second, and Shimea the third,

Exposition: 1Chronicles 2:13 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Jesse begat his firstborn Eliab, and Abinadab the second, and Shimma the third,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 2:14

Hebrew

נְתַנְאֵל הָֽרְבִיעִי רַדַּי הַחֲמִישִֽׁי׃

netane'el-hareviy'iy-raday-hachamiyshiy

KJV: Nethaneel the fourth, Raddai the fifth,

AKJV: Nethaneel the fourth, Raddai the fifth,

ASV: Nethanel the fourth, Raddai the fifth,

YLT: Nethaneel the fourth, Raddai the fifth,

Exposition: 1Chronicles 2:14 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Nethaneel the fourth, Raddai the fifth,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 2:15

Hebrew

אֹצֶם הַשִּׁשִּׁי דָּוִיד הַשְּׁבִעִֽי׃

'otzem-hashishiy-daviyd-hashevi'iy

KJV: Ozem the sixth, David the seventh:

AKJV: Ozem the sixth, David the seventh:

ASV: Ozem the sixth, David the seventh;

YLT: Ozem the sixth, David the seventh,

Exposition: 1Chronicles 2:15 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Ozem the sixth, David the seventh:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 2:16

Hebrew

ואחיתיהם וְאַחְיוֹתֵיהֶם צְרוּיָה וַאֲבִיגָיִל וּבְנֵי צְרוּיָה אַבְשַׁי וְיוֹאָב וַעֲשָׂה־אֵל שְׁלֹשָֽׁה׃

v'chytyhm-ve'acheyvoteyhem-tzervyah-va'aviygayil-vveney-tzervyah-'aveshay-veyvo'av-va'ashah-'el-sheloshah

KJV: Whose sisters were Zeruiah, and Abigail. And the sons of Zeruiah; Abishai, and Joab, and Asahel, three.

AKJV: Whose sisters were Zeruiah, and Abigail. And the sons of Zeruiah; Abishai, and Joab, and Asahel, three.

ASV: and their sisters were Zeruiah and Abigail. And the sons of Zeruiah: Abishai, and Joab, and Asahel, three.

YLT: and their sisters Zeruiah and Abigail. And sons of Zeruiah: Abishai, and Joab, and Asah-El--three.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 2:16 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Whose sisters were Zeruiah, and Abigail. And the sons of Zeruiah; Abishai, and Joab, and Asahel, three.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 2:17

Hebrew

וַאֲבִיגַיִל יָלְדָה אֶת־עֲמָשָׂא וַאֲבִי עֲמָשָׂא יֶתֶר הַיִּשְׁמְעֵאלִֽי׃

va'aviygayil-yaledah-'et-'amasha'-va'aviy-'amasha'-yeter-hayisheme'e'liy

KJV: And Abigail bare Amasa: and the father of Amasa was Jether the Ishmeelite.

AKJV: And Abigail bore Amasa: and the father of Amasa was Jether the Ishmeelite. ¶

ASV: And Abigail bare Amasa; and the father of Amasa was Jether the Ishmaelite.

YLT: And Abigail hath borne Amasa, and the father of Amasa is Jether the Ishmeelite.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 2:17 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Abigail bare Amasa: and the father of Amasa was Jether the Ishmeelite.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 2:18

Hebrew

וְכָלֵב בֶּן־חֶצְרוֹן הוֹלִיד אֶת־עֲזוּבָה אִשָּׁה וְאֶת־יְרִיעוֹת וְאֵלֶּה בָנֶיהָ יֵשֶׁר וְשׁוֹבָב וְאַרְדּֽוֹן׃

vekhalev-ven-chetzervon-hvoliyd-'et-'azvvah-'ishah-ve'et-yeriy'vot-ve'eleh-vaneyha-yesher-veshvovav-ve'aredvon

KJV: And Caleb the son of Hezron begat children of Azubah his wife, and of Jerioth: her sons are these; Jesher, and Shobab, and Ardon.

AKJV: And Caleb the son of Hezron begat children of Azubah his wife, and of Jerioth: her sons are these; Jesher, and Shobab, and Ardon.

ASV: And Caleb the son of Hezron begat children of Azubah his wife, and of Jerioth; and these were her sons: Jesher, and Shobab, and Ardon.

YLT: And Caleb son of Hezron hath begotten Azubah, Isshah, and Jerioth; and these are her sons: Jesher, and Shobab, and Ardon.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 2:18 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Caleb the son of Hezron begat children of Azubah his wife, and of Jerioth: her sons are these; Jesher, and Shobab, and Ardon.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 2:19

Hebrew

וַתָּמָת עֲזוּבָה וַיִּֽקַּֽח־לוֹ כָלֵב אֶת־אֶפְרָת וַתֵּלֶד לוֹ אֶת־חֽוּר׃

vatamat-'azvvah-vayiqach-lvo-khalev-'et-'eferat-vateled-lvo-'et-chvr

KJV: And when Azubah was dead, Caleb took unto him Ephrath, which bare him Hur.

AKJV: And when Azubah was dead, Caleb took to him Ephrath, which bore him Hur.

ASV: And Azubah died, and Caleb took unto him Ephrath, who bare him Hur.

YLT: And Azubah dieth, and Caleb taketh to him Ephrath, and she beareth to him Hur.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 2:19 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And when Azubah was dead, Caleb took unto him Ephrath, which bare him Hur.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 2:20

Hebrew

וְחוּר הוֹלִיד אֶת־אוּרִי וְאוּרִי הוֹלִיד אֶת־בְּצַלְאֵֽל׃

vechvr-hvoliyd-'et-'vriy-ve'vriy-hvoliyd-'et-vetzale'el

KJV: And Hur begat Uri, and Uri begat Bezaleel.

AKJV: And Hur begat Uri, and Uri begat Bezaleel. ¶

ASV: And Hur begat Uri, and Uri begat Bezalel.

YLT: And Hur begat Uri, and Uri begat Bezaleel.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 2:20 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Hur begat Uri, and Uri begat Bezaleel.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 2:21

Hebrew

וְאַחַר בָּא חֶצְרוֹן אֶל־בַּת־מָכִיר אֲבִי גִלְעָד וְהוּא לְקָחָהּ וְהוּא בֶּן־שִׁשִּׁים שָׁנָה וַתֵּלֶד לוֹ אֶת־שְׂגֽוּב׃

ve'achar-va'-chetzervon-'el-vat-makhiyr-'aviy-gile'ad-vehv'-leqachah-vehv'-ven-shishiym-shanah-vateled-lvo-'et-shegvv

KJV: And afterward Hezron went in to the daughter of Machir the father of Gilead, whom he married when he was threescore years old; and she bare him Segub.

AKJV: And afterward Hezron went in to the daughter of Machir the father of Gilead, whom he married when he was three score years old; and she bore him Segub.

ASV: And afterward Hezron went in to the daughter of Machir the father of Gilead, whom he tookto wifewhen he was threescore years old; and she bare him Segub.

YLT: And afterwards hath Hezron gone in unto a daughter of Machir father of Gilead, and he hath taken her, and he is a son of sixty years, and she beareth to him Segub.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 2:21 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And afterward Hezron went in to the daughter of Machir the father of Gilead, whom he married when he was threescore years old; and she bare him Segub.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 2:22

Hebrew

וּשְׂגוּב הוֹלִיד אֶת־יָאִיר וַֽיְהִי־לוֹ עֶשְׂרִים וְשָׁלוֹשׁ עָרִים בְּאֶרֶץ הַגִּלְעָֽד׃

vshegvv-hvoliyd-'et-ya'iyr-vayehiy-lvo-'esheriym-veshalvosh-'ariym-ve'eretz-hagile'ad

KJV: And Segub begat Jair, who had three and twenty cities in the land of Gilead.

AKJV: And Segub begat Jair, who had three and twenty cities in the land of Gilead.

ASV: And Segub begat Jair, who had three and twenty cities in the land of Gilead.

YLT: And Segub begat Jair, and he hath twenty and three cities in the land of Gilead,

Exposition: 1Chronicles 2:22 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Segub begat Jair, who had three and twenty cities in the land of Gilead.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 2:23

Hebrew

וַיִּקַּח גְּשֽׁוּר־וַאֲרָם אֶת־חַוֺּת יָאִיר מֵאִתָּם אֶת־קְנָת וְאֶת־בְּנֹתֶיהָ שִׁשִּׁים עִיר כָּל־אֵלֶּה בְּנֵי מָכִיר אֲבִי־גִלְעָֽד׃

vayiqach-geshvr-va'aram-'et-chavt-ya'iyr-me'itam-'et-qenat-ve'et-venoteyha-shishiym-'iyr-khal-'eleh-veney-makhiyr-'aviy-gile'ad

KJV: And he took Geshur, and Aram, with the towns of Jair, from them, with Kenath, and the towns thereof, even threescore cities. All these belonged to the sons of Machir the father of Gilead.

AKJV: And he took Geshur, and Aram, with the towns of Jair, from them, with Kenath, and the towns thereof, even three score cities. All these belonged to the sons of Machir the father of Gilead.

ASV: And Geshur and Aram took the towns of Jair from them, with Kenath, and the villages thereof, even threescore cities. All these were the sons of Machir the father of Gilead.

YLT: and he taketh Geshur and Aram, the small villages of Jair, from them, with Kenath and its small towns, sixty cities--all these belonged to the sons of Machir father of Gilead.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 2:23 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And he took Geshur, and Aram, with the towns of Jair, from them, with Kenath, and the towns thereof, even threescore cities. All these belonged to the sons of Machir the father of Gilead.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 2:24

Hebrew

וְאַחַר מוֹת־חֶצְרוֹן בְּכָלֵב אֶפְרָתָה וְאֵשֶׁת חֶצְרוֹן אֲבִיָּה וַתֵּלֶד לוֹ אֶת־אַשְׁחוּר אֲבִי תְקֽוֹעַ׃

ve'achar-mvot-chetzervon-vekhalev-'eferatah-ve'eshet-chetzervon-'aviyah-vateled-lvo-'et-'ashechvr-'aviy-teqvo'a

KJV: And after that Hezron was dead in Caleb–ephratah, then Abiah Hezron’s wife bare him Ashur the father of Tekoa.

AKJV: And after that Hezron was dead in Calebephratah, then Abiah Hezron’s wife bore him Ashur the father of Tekoa. ¶

ASV: And after that Hezron was dead in Caleb-ephrathah, then Abijah Hezron’s wife bare him Ashhur the father of Tekoa.

YLT: And after the death of Hezron in Caleb-Ephratah, then the wife of Hezron, Abijah, even beareth to him Asshur, father of Tekoa.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 2:24 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And after that Hezron was dead in Caleb–ephratah, then Abiah Hezron’s wife bare him Ashur the father of Tekoa.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 2:25

Hebrew

וַיִּהְיוּ בְנֵי־יְרַחְמְאֵל בְּכוֹר חֶצְרוֹן הַבְּכוֹר ׀ רָם וּבוּנָה וָאֹרֶן וָאֹצֶם אֲחִיָּֽה׃

vayiheyv-veney-yeracheme'el-vekhvor-chetzervon-havekhvor- -ram-vvvnah-va'oren-va'otzem-'achiyah

KJV: And the sons of Jerahmeel the firstborn of Hezron were, Ram the firstborn, and Bunah, and Oren, and Ozem, and Ahijah.

AKJV: And the sons of Jerahmeel the firstborn of Hezron were, Ram the firstborn, and Bunah, and Oren, and Ozem, and Ahijah.

ASV: And the sons of Jerahmeel the first-born of Hezron were Ram the first-born, and Bunah, and Oren, and Ozem, Ahijah.

YLT: And sons of Jerahmeel, first-born of Hezron, are: the first-born Ram, and Bunah, and Oren, and Ozem, Ahijah.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 2:25 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And the sons of Jerahmeel the firstborn of Hezron were, Ram the firstborn, and Bunah, and Oren, and Ozem, and Ahijah.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 2:26

Hebrew

וַתְּהִי אִשָּׁה אַחֶרֶת לִֽירַחְמְאֵל וּשְׁמָהּ עֲטָרָה הִיא אֵם אוֹנָֽם׃

vatehiy-'ishah-'acheret-liyracheme'el-vshemah-'atarah-hiy'-'em-'vonam

KJV: Jerahmeel had also another wife, whose name was Atarah; she was the mother of Onam.

AKJV: Jerahmeel had also another wife, whose name was Atarah; she was the mother of Onam.

ASV: And Jerahmeel had another wife, whose name was Atarah; she was the mother of Onam.

YLT: And Jerahmeel hath another wife, and her name is Atarah, she is mother of Onam.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 2:26 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Jerahmeel had also another wife, whose name was Atarah; she was the mother of Onam.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 2:27

Hebrew

וַיִּהְיוּ בְנֵי־רָם בְּכוֹר יְרַחְמְאֵל מַעַץ וְיָמִין וָעֵֽקֶר׃

vayiheyv-veney-ram-vekhvor-yeracheme'el-ma'atz-veyamiyn-va'eqer

KJV: And the sons of Ram the firstborn of Jerahmeel were, Maaz, and Jamin, and Eker.

AKJV: And the sons of Ram the firstborn of Jerahmeel were, Maaz, and Jamin, and Eker.

ASV: And the sons of Ram the first-born of Jerahmeel were Maaz, and Jamin, and Eker.

YLT: And sons of Ram, first-born of Jerahmeel, are Maaz, and Jamin, and Eker.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 2:27 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And the sons of Ram the firstborn of Jerahmeel were, Maaz, and Jamin, and Eker.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 2:28

Hebrew

וַיִּהְיוּ בְנֵי־אוֹנָם שַׁמַּי וְיָדָע וּבְנֵי שַׁמַּי נָדָב וַאֲבִישֽׁוּר׃

vayiheyv-veney-'vonam-shamay-veyada'-vveney-shamay-nadav-va'aviyshvr

KJV: And the sons of Onam were, Shammai, and Jada. And the sons of Shammai; Nadab, and Abishur.

AKJV: And the sons of Onam were, Shammai, and Jada. And the sons of Shammai; Nadab and Abishur.

ASV: And the sons of Onam were Shammai, and Jada. And the sons of Shammai: Nadab, and Abishur.

YLT: And sons of Onam are Shammai and Jada. And sons of Shammai: Nadab and Abishur.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 2:28 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And the sons of Onam were, Shammai, and Jada. And the sons of Shammai; Nadab, and Abishur.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 2:29

Hebrew

וְשֵׁם אֵשֶׁת אֲבִישׁוּר אֲבִיהָיִל וַתֵּלֶד לוֹ אֶת־אַחְבָּן וְאֶת־מוֹלִֽיד׃

veshem-'eshet-'aviyshvr-'aviyhayil-vateled-lvo-'et-'achevan-ve'et-mvoliyd

KJV: And the name of the wife of Abishur was Abihail, and she bare him Ahban, and Molid.

AKJV: And the name of the wife of Abishur was Abihail, and she bore him Ahban, and Molid.

ASV: And the name of the wife of Abishur was Abihail; and she bare him Ahban, and Molid.

YLT: And the name of the wife of Abishur is Abihail, and she beareth to him Ahban and Molid.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 2:29 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And the name of the wife of Abishur was Abihail, and she bare him Ahban, and Molid.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 2:30

Hebrew

וּבְנֵי נָדָב סֶלֶד וְאַפָּיִם וַיָּמָת סֶלֶד לֹא בָנִֽים׃

vveney-nadav-seled-ve'afayim-vayamat-seled-lo'-vaniym

KJV: And the sons of Nadab; Seled, and Appaim: but Seled died without children.

AKJV: And the sons of Nadab; Seled, and Appaim: but Seled died without children.

ASV: And the sons of Nadab: Seled, and Appaim; but Seled died without children.

YLT: And sons of Nadab: Seled, and Appaim; and Seled dieth without sons.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 2:30 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And the sons of Nadab; Seled, and Appaim: but Seled died without children.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 2:31

Hebrew

וּבְנֵי אַפַּיִם יִשְׁעִי וּבְנֵי יִשְׁעִי שֵׁשָׁן וּבְנֵי שֵׁשָׁן אַחְלָֽי׃

vveney-'afayim-yishe'iy-vveney-yishe'iy-sheshan-vveney-sheshan-'achelay

KJV: And the sons of Appaim; Ishi. And the sons of Ishi; Sheshan. And the children of Sheshan; Ahlai.

AKJV: And the sons of Appaim; Ishi. And the sons of Ishi; Sheshan. And the children of Sheshan; Ahlai.

ASV: And the sons of Appaim: Ishi. And the sons of Ishi: Sheshan. And the sons of Sheshan: Ahlai.

YLT: And sons of Appaim: Ishi. And sons of Ishi: Sheshan. And sons of Sheshan: Ahlai.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 2:31 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And the sons of Appaim; Ishi. And the sons of Ishi; Sheshan. And the children of Sheshan; Ahlai.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 2:32

Hebrew

וּבְנֵי יָדָע אֲחִי שַׁמַּי יֶתֶר וְיוֹנָתָן וַיָּמָת יֶתֶר לֹא בָנִֽים׃

vveney-yada'-'achiy-shamay-yeter-veyvonatan-vayamat-yeter-lo'-vaniym

KJV: And the sons of Jada the brother of Shammai; Jether, and Jonathan: and Jether died without children.

AKJV: And the sons of Jada the brother of Shammai; Jether, and Jonathan: and Jether died without children.

ASV: And the sons of Jada the brother of Shammai: Jether, and Jonathan; and Jether died without children.

YLT: And sons of Jada, brother of Shammai: Jether, and Jonathan: and Jether dieth without sons.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 2:32 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And the sons of Jada the brother of Shammai; Jether, and Jonathan: and Jether died without children.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 2:33

Hebrew

וּבְנֵי יוֹנָתָן פֶּלֶת וְזָזָא אֵלֶּה הָיוּ בְּנֵי יְרַחְמְאֵֽל׃

vveney-yvonatan-felet-vezaza'-'eleh-hayv-veney-yeracheme'el

KJV: And the sons of Jonathan; Peleth, and Zaza. These were the sons of Jerahmeel.

AKJV: And the sons of Jonathan; Peleth, and Zaza. These were the sons of Jerahmeel. ¶

ASV: And the sons of Jonathan: Peleth, and Zaza. These were the sons of Jerahmeel.

YLT: And sons of Jonathan: Peleth, and Zaza. These were sons of Jerahmeel.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 2:33 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And the sons of Jonathan; Peleth, and Zaza. These were the sons of Jerahmeel.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 2:34

Hebrew

וְלֹֽא־הָיָה לְשֵׁשָׁן בָּנִים כִּי אִם־בָּנוֹת וּלְשֵׁשָׁן עֶבֶד מִצְרִי וּשְׁמוֹ יַרְחָֽע׃

velo'-hayah-lesheshan-vaniym-khiy-'im-vanvot-vlesheshan-'eved-mitzeriy-vshemvo-yarecha'

KJV: Now Sheshan had no sons, but daughters. And Sheshan had a servant, an Egyptian, whose name was Jarha.

AKJV: Now Sheshan had no sons, but daughters. And Sheshan had a servant, an Egyptian, whose name was Jarha.

ASV: Now Sheshan had no sons, but daughters. And Sheshan had a servant, an Egyptian, whose name was Jarha.

YLT: And Sheshan had no sons, but daughters, and Sheshan hath a servant, an Egyptian, and his name is Jarha,

Exposition: 1Chronicles 2:34 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Now Sheshan had no sons, but daughters. And Sheshan had a servant, an Egyptian, whose name was Jarha.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 2:35

Hebrew

וַיִּתֵּן שֵׁשָׁן אֶת־בִּתּוֹ לְיַרְחָע עַבְדּוֹ לְאִשָּׁה וַתֵּלֶד לוֹ אֶת־עַתָּֽי׃

vayiten-sheshan-'et-vitvo-leyarecha'-'avedvo-le'ishah-vateled-lvo-'et-'atay

KJV: And Sheshan gave his daughter to Jarha his servant to wife; and she bare him Attai.

AKJV: And Sheshan gave his daughter to Jarha his servant to wife; and she bore him Attai.

ASV: And Sheshan gave his daughter to Jarha his servant to wife; and she bare him Attai.

YLT: and Sheshan giveth his daughter to Jarha his servant for a wife, and she beareth to him Attai;

Exposition: 1Chronicles 2:35 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Sheshan gave his daughter to Jarha his servant to wife; and she bare him Attai.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 2:36

Hebrew

וְעַתַּי הֹלִיד אֶת־נָתָן וְנָתָן הוֹלִיד אֶת־זָבָֽד׃

ve'atay-holiyd-'et-natan-venatan-hvoliyd-'et-zavad

KJV: And Attai begat Nathan, and Nathan begat Zabad,

AKJV: And Attai begat Nathan, and Nathan begat Zabad,

ASV: And Attai begat Nathan, and Nathan begat Zabad,

YLT: and Attai begat Nathan, and Nathan begat Zabad,

Exposition: 1Chronicles 2:36 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Attai begat Nathan, and Nathan begat Zabad,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 2:37

Hebrew

וְזָבָד הוֹלִיד אֶת־אֶפְלָל וְאֶפְלָל הוֹלִיד אֶת־עוֹבֵֽד׃

vezavad-hvoliyd-'et-'efelal-ve'efelal-hvoliyd-'et-'voved

KJV: And Zabad begat Ephlal, and Ephlal begat Obed,

AKJV: And Zabad begat Ephlal, and Ephlal begat Obed,

ASV: and Zabad begat Ephlal, and Ephlal begat Obed,

YLT: and Zabad begat Ephlal, and Ephlal begat Obed,

Exposition: 1Chronicles 2:37 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Zabad begat Ephlal, and Ephlal begat Obed,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 2:38

Hebrew

וְעוֹבֵד הוֹלִיד אֶת־יֵהוּא וְיֵהוּא הוֹלִיד אֶת־עֲזַרְיָֽה׃

ve'voved-hvoliyd-'et-yehv'-veyehv'-hvoliyd-'et-'azareyah

KJV: And Obed begat Jehu, and Jehu begat Azariah,

AKJV: And Obed begat Jehu, and Jehu begat Azariah,

ASV: and Obed begat Jehu, and Jehu begat Azariah,

YLT: and Obed begat Jehu,

Exposition: 1Chronicles 2:38 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Obed begat Jehu, and Jehu begat Azariah,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 2:39

Hebrew

וַעֲזַרְיָה הֹלִיד אֶת־חָלֶץ וְחֶלֶץ הֹלִיד אֶת־אֶלְעָשָֽׂה׃

va'azareyah-holiyd-'et-chaletz-vecheletz-holiyd-'et-'ele'ashah

KJV: And Azariah begat Helez, and Helez begat Eleasah,

AKJV: And Azariah begat Helez, and Helez begat Eleasah,

ASV: and Azariah begat Helez, and Helez begat Eleasah,

YLT: and Jehu begat Azariah, and Azariah begat Helez, and Helez begat Eleasah,

Exposition: 1Chronicles 2:39 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Azariah begat Helez, and Helez begat Eleasah,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 2:40

Hebrew

וְאֶלְעָשָׂה הֹלִיד אֶת־סִֽסְמָי וְסִסְמַי הֹלִיד אֶת־שַׁלּֽוּם׃

ve'ele'ashah-holiyd-'et-sisemay-vesisemay-holiyd-'et-shalvm

KJV: And Eleasah begat Sisamai, and Sisamai begat Shallum,

AKJV: And Eleasah begat Sisamai, and Sisamai begat Shallum,

ASV: and Eleasah begat Sismai, and Sismai begat Shallum,

YLT: and Eleasah begat Sismai, and Sismai begat Shallum,

Exposition: 1Chronicles 2:40 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Eleasah begat Sisamai, and Sisamai begat Shallum,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 2:41

Hebrew

וְשַׁלּוּם הוֹלִיד אֶת־יְקַמְיָה וִֽיקַמְיָה הֹלִיד אֶת־אֱלִישָׁמָֽע׃

veshalvm-hvoliyd-'et-yeqameyah-viyqameyah-holiyd-'et-'eliyshama'

KJV: And Shallum begat Jekamiah, and Jekamiah begat Elishama.

AKJV: And Shallum begat Jekamiah, and Jekamiah begat Elishama. ¶

ASV: and Shallum begat Jekamiah, and Jekamiah begat Elishama.

YLT: and Shallum begat Jekamiah, and Jekamiah begat Elishama.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 2:41 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Shallum begat Jekamiah, and Jekamiah begat Elishama.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 2:42

Hebrew

וּבְנֵי כָלֵב אֲחִי יְרַחְמְאֵל מֵישָׁע בְּכֹרוֹ הוּא אֲבִי־זִיף וּבְנֵי מָרֵשָׁה אֲבִי חֶבְרֽוֹן׃

vveney-khalev-'achiy-yeracheme'el-meysha'-vekhorvo-hv'-'aviy-ziyf-vveney-mareshah-'aviy-chevervon

KJV: Now the sons of Caleb the brother of Jerahmeel were, Mesha his firstborn, which was the father of Ziph; and the sons of Mareshah the father of Hebron.

AKJV: Now the sons of Caleb the brother of Jerahmeel were, Mesha his firstborn, which was the father of Ziph; and the sons of Mareshah the father of Hebron.

ASV: And the sons of Caleb the brother of Jerahmeel were Mesha his first-born, who was the father of Ziph; and the sons of Mareshah the father of Hebron.

YLT: And sons of Caleb brother of Jerahmeel: Mesha his first-born, he is father of Ziph; and sons of Mareshah: Abi-Hebron.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 2:42 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Now the sons of Caleb the brother of Jerahmeel were, Mesha his firstborn, which was the father of Ziph; and the sons of Mareshah the father of Hebron.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 2:43

Hebrew

וּבְנֵי חֶבְרוֹן קֹרַח וְתַפֻּחַ וְרֶקֶם וָשָֽׁמַע׃

vveney-chevervon-qorach-vetafucha-vereqem-vashama'

KJV: And the sons of Hebron; Korah, and Tappuah, and Rekem, and Shema.

AKJV: And the sons of Hebron; Korah, and Tappuah, and Rekem, and Shema.

ASV: And the sons of Hebron: Korah, and Tappuah, and Rekem, and Shema.

YLT: And sons of Hebron: Korah, and Tappuah, and Rekem, and Shema.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 2:43 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And the sons of Hebron; Korah, and Tappuah, and Rekem, and Shema.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 2:44

Hebrew

וְשֶׁמַע הוֹלִיד אֶת־רַחַם אֲבִי יָרְקֳעָם וְרֶקֶם הוֹלִיד אֶת־שַׁמָּֽי׃

veshema'-hvoliyd-'et-racham-'aviy-yareqo'am-vereqem-hvoliyd-'et-shamay

KJV: And Shema begat Raham, the father of Jorkoam: and Rekem begat Shammai.

AKJV: And Shema begat Raham, the father of Jorkoam: and Rekem begat Shammai.

ASV: And Shema begat Raham, the father of Jorkeam; and Rekem begat Shammai.

YLT: And Shema begat Raham father of Jorkoam, and Rekem begat Shammai.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 2:44 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Shema begat Raham, the father of Jorkoam: and Rekem begat Shammai.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 2:45

Hebrew

וּבֶן־שַׁמַּי מָעוֹן וּמָעוֹן אֲבִי בֵֽית־צֽוּר׃

vven-shamay-ma'von-vma'von-'aviy-veyt-tzvr

KJV: And the son of Shammai was Maon: and Maon was the father of Beth–zur.

AKJV: And the son of Shammai was Maon: and Maon was the father of Bethzur.

ASV: And the son of Shammai was Maon; and Maon was the father of Beth-zur.

YLT: And a son of Shammai is Maon, and Maon is father of Beth-Zur.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 2:45 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And the son of Shammai was Maon: and Maon was the father of Beth–zur.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 2:46

Hebrew

וְעֵיפָה פִּילֶגֶשׁ כָּלֵב יָֽלְדָה אֶת־חָרָן וְאֶת־מוֹצָא וְאֶת־גָּזֵז וְחָרָן הֹלִיד אֶת־גָּזֵֽז׃

ve'eyfah-fiylegesh-khalev-yaledah-'et-charan-ve'et-mvotza'-ve'et-gazez-vecharan-holiyd-'et-gazez

KJV: And Ephah, Caleb’s concubine, bare Haran, and Moza, and Gazez: and Haran begat Gazez.

AKJV: And Ephah, Caleb’s concubine, bore Haran, and Moza, and Gazez: and Haran begat Gazez.

ASV: And Ephah, Caleb’s concubine, bare Haran, and Moza, and Gazez; and Haran begat Gazez.

YLT: And Ephah concubine of Caleb bare Haran, and Moza, and Gazez; and Haran begat Gazez.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 2:46 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Ephah, Caleb’s concubine, bare Haran, and Moza, and Gazez: and Haran begat Gazez.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 2:47

Hebrew

וּבְנֵי יָהְדָּי רֶגֶם וְיוֹתָם וְגֵישָׁן וָפֶלֶט וְעֵיפָה וָשָֽׁעַף׃

vveney-yaheday-regem-veyvotam-vegeyshan-vafelet-ve'eyfah-vasha'af

KJV: And the sons of Jahdai; Regem, and Jotham, and Geshan, and Pelet, and Ephah, and Shaaph.

AKJV: And the sons of Jahdai; Regem, and Jotham, and Gesham, and Pelet, and Ephah, and Shaaph.

ASV: And the sons of Jahdai: Regem, and Jothan, and Geshan, and Pelet, and Ephah, and Shaaph.

YLT: And sons of Jahdai: Regem, and Jotham, and Geshem, and Pelet, and Ephah, and Shaaph.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 2:47 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And the sons of Jahdai; Regem, and Jotham, and Geshan, and Pelet, and Ephah, and Shaaph.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 2:48

Hebrew

פִּלֶגֶשׁ כָּלֵב מַעֲכָה יָלַד שֶׁבֶר וְאֶֽת־תִּרְחֲנָֽה׃

filegesh-khalev-ma'akhah-yalad-shever-ve'et-tirechanah

KJV: Maachah, Caleb’s concubine, bare Sheber, and Tirhanah.

AKJV: Maachah, Caleb’s concubine, bore Sheber, and Tirhanah.

ASV: Maacah, Caleb’s concubine, bare Sheber and Tirhanah.

YLT: The concubine of Caleb, Maachah, bare Sheber and Tirhanah;

Exposition: 1Chronicles 2:48 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Maachah, Caleb’s concubine, bare Sheber, and Tirhanah.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 2:49

Hebrew

וַתֵּלֶד שַׁעַף אֲבִי מַדְמַנָּה אֶת־שְׁוָא אֲבִי מַכְבֵּנָה וַאֲבִי גִבְעָא וּבַת־כָּלֵב עַכְסָֽה׃

vateled-sha'af-'aviy-mademanah-'et-sheva'-'aviy-makhevenah-va'aviy-give'a'-vvat-khalev-'akhesah

KJV: She bare also Shaaph the father of Madmannah, Sheva the father of Machbenah, and the father of Gibea: and the daughter of Caleb was Achsah.

AKJV: She bore also Shaaph the father of Madmannah, Sheva the father of Machbenah, and the father of Gibea: and the daughter of Caleb was Achsa. ¶

ASV: She bare also Shaaph the father of Madmannah, Sheva the father of Machbena, and the father of Gibea; and the daughter of Caleb was Achsah.

YLT: and she beareth Shaaph father of Madmannah, Sheva father of Machbenah, and father of Gibea; and a daughter of Caleb is Achsa.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 2:49 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'She bare also Shaaph the father of Madmannah, Sheva the father of Machbenah, and the father of Gibea: and the daughter of Caleb was Achsah.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 2:50

Hebrew

אֵלֶּה הָיוּ בְּנֵי כָלֵב בֶּן־חוּר בְּכוֹר אֶפְרָתָה שׁוֹבָל אֲבִי קִרְיַת יְעָרִֽים׃

'eleh-hayv-veney-khalev-ven-chvr-vekhvor-'eferatah-shvoval-'aviy-qireyat-ye'ariym

KJV: These were the sons of Caleb the son of Hur, the firstborn of Ephratah; Shobal the father of Kirjath–jearim,

AKJV: These were the sons of Caleb the son of Hur, the firstborn of Ephratah; Shobal the father of Kirjathjearim.

ASV: These were the sons of Caleb, the son of Hur, the first-born of Ephrathah: Shobal the father of Kiriath-jearim,

YLT: These were sons of Caleb son of Hur, first-born of Ephrathah: Shobal father of Kirjath-Jearim,

Exposition: 1Chronicles 2:50 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'These were the sons of Caleb the son of Hur, the firstborn of Ephratah; Shobal the father of Kirjath–jearim,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 2:51

Hebrew

שַׂלְמָא אֲבִי בֵֽית־לָחֶם חָרֵף אֲבִי בֵית־גָּדֵֽר׃

shalema'-'aviy-veyt-lachem-charef-'aviy-veyt-gader

KJV: Salma the father of Beth–lehem, Hareph the father of Beth–gader.

AKJV: Salma the father of Bethlehem, Hareph the father of Bethgader.

ASV: Salma the father of Beth-lehem, Hareph the father of Beth-gader.

YLT: Salma father of Beth-Lehem, Hareph father of Beth-Gader.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 2:51 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Salma the father of Beth–lehem, Hareph the father of Beth–gader.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 2:52

Hebrew

וַיִּהְיוּ בָנִים לְשׁוֹבָל אֲבִי קִרְיַת יְעָרִים הָרֹאֶה חֲצִי הַמְּנֻחֽוֹת׃

vayiheyv-vaniym-leshvoval-'aviy-qireyat-ye'ariym-haro'eh-chatziy-hamenuchvot

KJV: And Shobal the father of Kirjath–jearim had sons; Haroeh, and half of the Manahethites.

AKJV: And Shobal the father of Kirjathjearim had sons; Haroeh, and half of the Manahethites.

ASV: And Shobal the father of Kiriath-jearim had sons: Haroeh, half of the Menuhoth.

YLT: And there are sons to Shobal father of Kirjath-Jearim: Haroeh, half of the Menuhothite;

Exposition: 1Chronicles 2:52 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Shobal the father of Kirjath–jearim had sons; Haroeh, and half of the Manahethites.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 2:53

Hebrew

וּמִשְׁפְּחוֹת קִרְיַת יְעָרִים הַיִּתְרִי וְהַפּוּתִי וְהַשֻּׁמָתִי וְהַמִּשְׁרָעִי מֵאֵלֶּה יָצְאוּ הַצָּרְעָתִי וְהָאֶשְׁתָּאֻֽלִֽי׃

vmishefechvot-qireyat-ye'ariym-hayiteriy-vehafvtiy-vehashumatiy-vehamishera'iy-me'eleh-yatze'v-hatzare'atiy-veha'esheta'uliy

KJV: And the families of Kirjath–jearim; the Ithrites, and the Puhites, and the Shumathites, and the Mishraites; of them came the Zareathites, and the Eshtaulites.

AKJV: And the families of Kirjathjearim; the Ithrites, and the Puhites, and the Shumathites, and the Mishraites; of them came the Zareathites, and the Eshtaulites,

ASV: And the families of Kiriath-jearim: The Ithrites, and the Puthites, and the Shumathites, and the Mishraites; of them came the Zorathites and the Eshtaolites.

YLT: and the families of Kirjath-Jearim: the Ithrite, and the Puhite, and the Shumathite, and the Mishraite: from these went out the Zareathite, and the Eshtaulite.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 2:53 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And the families of Kirjath–jearim; the Ithrites, and the Puhites, and the Shumathites, and the Mishraites; of them came the Zareathites, and the Eshtaulites.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 2:54

Hebrew

בְּנֵי שַׂלְמָא בֵּית לֶחֶם וּנְטוֹפָתִי עַטְרוֹת בֵּית יוֹאָב וַחֲצִי הַמָּנַחְתִּי הַצָּרְעִֽי׃

veney-shalema'-veyt-lechem-vnetvofatiy-'atervot-veyt-yvo'av-vachatziy-hamanachetiy-hatzare'iy

KJV: The sons of Salma; Beth–lehem, and the Netophathites, Ataroth, the house of Joab, and half of the Manahethites, the Zorites.

AKJV: The sons of Salma; Bethlehem, and the Netophathites, Ataroth, the house of Joab, and half of the Manahethites, the Zorites.

ASV: The sons of Salma: Beth-lehem, and the Netophathites, Atroth-beth-joab, and half of the Manahathites, the Zorites.

YLT: Sons of Salma: Beth-Lehem, and the Netophathite, Atroth, Beth-Joab, and half of the Menuhothite, the Zorite;

Exposition: 1Chronicles 2:54 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'The sons of Salma; Beth–lehem, and the Netophathites, Ataroth, the house of Joab, and half of the Manahethites, the Zorites.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 2:55

Hebrew

וּמִשְׁפְּחוֹת סֹפְרִים ישבו יֹשְׁבֵי יַעְבֵּץ תִּרְעָתִים שִׁמְעָתִים שׂוּכָתִים הֵמָּה הַקִּינִים הַבָּאִים מֵחַמַּת אֲבִי בֵית־רֵכָֽב׃

vmishefechvot-soferiym-yshvv-yoshevey-ya'evetz-tire'atiym-shime'atiym-shvkhatiym-hemah-haqiyniym-hava'iym-mechamat-'aviy-veyt-rekhav

KJV: And the families of the scribes which dwelt at Jabez; the Tirathites, the Shimeathites, and Suchathites. These are the Kenites that came of Hemath, the father of the house of Rechab.

AKJV: And the families of the scribes which dwelled at Jabez; the Tirathites, the Shimeathites, and Suchathites. These are the Kenites that came of Hemath, the father of the house of Rechab.

ASV: And the families of scribes that dwelt at Jabez: the Tirathites, the Shimeathites, the Sucathites. These are the Kenites that came of Hammath, the father of the house of Rechab.

YLT: and the families of the scribes the inhabitants of Jabez: Tirathites, Shimeathites, Suchathites. They are the Kenites, those coming of Hammath father of the house of Rechab.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 2:55 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And the families of the scribes which dwelt at Jabez; the Tirathites, the Shimeathites, and Suchathites. These are the Kenites that came of Hemath, the father of the house of Rechab.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.