Apologetics Bible

1Chronicles 8:1

Hebrew

וּבִנְיָמִן הוֹלִיד אֶת־בֶּלַע בְּכֹרוֹ אַשְׁבֵּל הַשֵּׁנִי וְאַחְרַח הַשְּׁלִישִֽׁי׃

vvineyamin-hvoliyd-'et-vela'-vekhorvo-'ashevel-hasheniy-ve'acherach-hasheliyshiy

KJV: Now Benjamin begat Bela his firstborn, Ashbel the second, and Aharah the third,

AKJV: Now Benjamin begat Bela his firstborn, Ashbel the second, and Aharah the third,

ASV: And Benjamin begat Bela his first-born, Ashbel the second, and Aharah the third,

YLT: And Benjamin begat Bela his first-born, Ashbel the second, and Aharah the third,

Exposition: 1Chronicles 8:1 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Now Benjamin begat Bela his firstborn, Ashbel the second, and Aharah the third,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 8:2

Hebrew

נוֹחָה הָֽרְבִיעִי וְרָפָא הַחֲמִישִֽׁי׃

nvochah-hareviy'iy-verafa'-hachamiyshiy

KJV: Nohah the fourth, and Rapha the fifth.

AKJV: Nohah the fourth, and Rapha the fifth.

ASV: Nohah the fourth, and Rapha the fifth.

YLT: Nohah the fourth, and Rapha the fifth.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 8:2 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Nohah the fourth, and Rapha the fifth.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 8:3

Hebrew

וַיִּהְיוּ בָנִים לְבָלַע אַדָּר וְגֵרָא וַאֲבִיהֽוּד׃

vayiheyv-vaniym-levala'-'adar-vegera'-va'aviyhvd

KJV: And the sons of Bela were, Addar, and Gera, and Abihud,

AKJV: And the sons of Bela were, Addar, and Gera, and Abihud,

ASV: And Bela had sons: Addar, and Gera, and Abihud,

YLT: And there are sons to Bela: Addar, and Gera,

Exposition: 1Chronicles 8:3 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And the sons of Bela were, Addar, and Gera, and Abihud,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 8:4

Hebrew

וַאֲבִישׁוּעַ וְנַעֲמָן וַאֲחֽוֹחַ׃

va'aviyshv'a-vena'aman-va'achvocha

KJV: And Abishua, and Naaman, and Ahoah,

AKJV: And Abishua, and Naaman, and Ahoah,

ASV: and Abishua, and Naaman, and Ahoah,

YLT: and Abihud, and Abishua, and Naaman, and Ahoah,

Exposition: 1Chronicles 8:4 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Abishua, and Naaman, and Ahoah,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 8:5

Hebrew

וְגֵרָא וּשְׁפוּפָן וְחוּרָֽם׃

vegera'-vshefvfan-vechvram

KJV: And Gera, and Shephuphan, and Huram.

AKJV: And Gera, and Shephuphan, and Huram.

ASV: and Gera, and Shephuphan, and Huram.

YLT: and Gera, and Shephuphan, and Huram.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 8:5 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Gera, and Shephuphan, and Huram.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 8:6

Hebrew

וְאֵלֶּה בְּנֵי אֵחוּד אֵלֶּה הֵם רָאשֵׁי אָבוֹת לְיוֹשְׁבֵי גֶבַע וַיַּגְלוּם אֶל־מָנָֽחַת׃

ve'eleh-veney-'echvd-'eleh-hem-ra'shey-'avvot-leyvoshevey-geva'-vayagelvm-'el-manachat

KJV: And these are the sons of Ehud: these are the heads of the fathers of the inhabitants of Geba, and they removed them to Manahath:

AKJV: And these are the sons of Ehud: these are the heads of the fathers of the inhabitants of Geba, and they removed them to Manahath:

ASV: And these are the sons of Ehud: these are the heads of fathers’ houses of the inhabitants of Geba, and they carried them captive to Manahath:

YLT: And these are sons of Ehud: they are heads of fathers to the inhabitants of Geba, and they remove them unto Manahath;

Exposition: 1Chronicles 8:6 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And these are the sons of Ehud: these are the heads of the fathers of the inhabitants of Geba, and they removed them to Manahath:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 8:7

Hebrew

וְנַעֲמָן וַאֲחִיָּה וְגֵרָא הוּא הֶגְלָם וְהוֹלִיד אֶת־עֻזָּא וְאֶת־אֲחִיחֻֽד׃

vena'aman-va'achiyah-vegera'-hv'-hegelam-vehvoliyd-'et-'uza'-ve'et-'achiychud

KJV: And Naaman, and Ahiah, and Gera, he removed them, and begat Uzza, and Ahihud.

AKJV: And Naaman, and Ahiah, and Gera, he removed them, and begat Uzza, and Ahihud.

ASV: and Naaman, and Ahijah, and Gera, he carried them captive; and he begat Uzza and Ahihud.

YLT: and Naaman, and Ahiah, and Gera, he removed them, and begat Uzza and Ahihud.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 8:7 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Naaman, and Ahiah, and Gera, he removed them, and begat Uzza, and Ahihud.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 8:8

Hebrew

וְשַׁחֲרַיִם הוֹלִיד בִּשְׂדֵה מוֹאָב מִן־שִׁלְחוֹ אֹתָם חוּשִׁים וְאֶֽת־בַּעֲרָא נָשָֽׁיו׃

veshacharayim-hvoliyd-vishedeh-mvo'av-min-shilechvo-'otam-chvshiym-ve'et-va'ara'-nashayv

KJV: And Shaharaim begat children in the country of Moab, after he had sent them away; Hushim and Baara were his wives.

AKJV: And Shaharaim begat children in the country of Moab, after he had sent them away; Hushim and Baara were his wives.

ASV: And Shaharaim begat children in the field of Moab, after he had sent them away; Hushim and Baara were his wives.

YLT: And Shaharaim begat in the field of Moab, after his sending them away; Hushim and Baara are his wives.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 8:8 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Shaharaim begat children in the country of Moab, after he had sent them away; Hushim and Baara were his wives.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 8:9

Hebrew

וַיּוֹלֶד מִן־חֹדֶשׁ אִשְׁתּוֹ אֶת־יוֹבָב וְאֶת־צִבְיָא וְאֶת־מֵישָׁא וְאֶת־מַלְכָּֽם׃

vayvoled-min-chodesh-'ishetvo-'et-yvovav-ve'et-tziveya'-ve'et-meysha'-ve'et-malekham

KJV: And he begat of Hodesh his wife, Jobab, and Zibia, and Mesha, and Malcham,

AKJV: And he begat of Hodesh his wife, Jobab, and Zibia, and Mesha, and Malcham,

ASV: And he begat of Hodesh his wife, Jobab, and Zibia, and Mesha, and Malcam,

YLT: And he begetteth of Hodesh his wife, Jobab, and Zibia, and Mesha, and Malcham,

Exposition: 1Chronicles 8:9 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And he begat of Hodesh his wife, Jobab, and Zibia, and Mesha, and Malcham,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 8:10

Hebrew

וְאֶת־יְעוּץ וְאֶת־שָֽׂכְיָה וְאֶת־מִרְמָה אֵלֶּה בָנָיו רָאשֵׁי אָבֽוֹת׃

ve'et-ye'vtz-ve'et-shakheyah-ve'et-miremah-'eleh-vanayv-ra'shey-'avvot

KJV: And Jeuz, and Shachia, and Mirma. These were his sons, heads of the fathers.

AKJV: And Jeuz, and Shachia, and Mirma. These were his sons, heads of the fathers.

ASV: and Jeuz, and Shachia, and Mirmah. These were his sons, heads of fathers’ houses.

YLT: and Jeuz, and Shachiah, and Mirmah. These are his sons, heads of fathers.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 8:10 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Jeuz, and Shachia, and Mirma. These were his sons, heads of the fathers.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 8:11

Hebrew

וּמֵחֻשִׁים הוֹלִיד אֶת־אֲבִיטוּב וְאֶת־אֶלְפָּֽעַל׃

vmechushiym-hvoliyd-'et-'aviytvv-ve'et-'elefa'al

KJV: And of Hushim he begat Abitub, and Elpaal.

AKJV: And of Hushim he begat Abitub, and Elpaal.

ASV: And of Hushim he begat Abitub and Elpaal.

YLT: And of Hushim he begat Ahitub and Elpaal.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 8:11 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And of Hushim he begat Abitub, and Elpaal.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 8:12

Hebrew

וּבְנֵי אֶלְפַּעַל עֵבֶר וּמִשְׁעָם וָשָׁמֶד הוּא בָּנָה אֶת־אוֹנוֹ וְאֶת־לֹד וּבְנֹתֶֽיהָ׃

vveney-'elefa'al-'ever-vmishe'am-vashamed-hv'-vanah-'et-'vonvo-ve'et-lod-vvenoteyha

KJV: The sons of Elpaal; Eber, and Misham, and Shamed, who built Ono, and Lod, with the towns thereof:

AKJV: The sons of Elpaal; Eber, and Misham, and Shamed, who built Ono, and Lod, with the towns thereof:

ASV: And the sons of Elpaal: Eber, and Misham, and Shemed, who built Ono and Lod, with the towns thereof;

YLT: And sons of Elpaal: Eber, and Misheam, and Shamer, (he built Ono and Lod and its small towns),

Exposition: 1Chronicles 8:12 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'The sons of Elpaal; Eber, and Misham, and Shamed, who built Ono, and Lod, with the towns thereof:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 8:13

Hebrew

וּבְרִעָה וָשֶׁמַע הֵמָּה רָאשֵׁי הָאָבוֹת לְיוֹשְׁבֵי אַיָּלוֹן הֵמָּה הִבְרִיחוּ אֶת־יוֹשְׁבֵי גַֽת׃

vveri'ah-vashema'-hemah-ra'shey-ha'avvot-leyvoshevey-'ayalvon-hemah-hiveriychv-'et-yvoshevey-gat

KJV: Beriah also, and Shema, who were heads of the fathers of the inhabitants of Aijalon, who drove away the inhabitants of Gath:

AKJV: Beriah also, and Shema, who were heads of the fathers of the inhabitants of Aijalon, who drove away the inhabitants of Gath:

ASV: and Beriah, and Shema, who were heads of fathers’ houses of the inhabitants of Aijalon, who put to flight the inhabitants of Gath;

YLT: and Beriah and Shema, (they are the heads of fathers to the inhabitants of Aijalon--they caused to flee the inhabitants of Gath),

Exposition: 1Chronicles 8:13 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Beriah also, and Shema, who were heads of the fathers of the inhabitants of Aijalon, who drove away the inhabitants of Gath:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 8:14

Hebrew

וְאַחְיוֹ שָׁשָׁק וִירֵמֽוֹת׃

ve'acheyvo-shashaq-viyremvot

KJV: And Ahio, Shashak, and Jeremoth,

AKJV: And Ahio, Shashak, and Jeremoth,

ASV: and Ahio, Shashak, and Jeremoth,

YLT: and Ahio, Shashak, and Jeremoth,

Exposition: 1Chronicles 8:14 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Ahio, Shashak, and Jeremoth,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 8:15

Hebrew

וּזְבַדְיָה וַעֲרָד וָעָֽדֶר׃

vzevadeyah-va'arad-va'ader

KJV: And Zebadiah, and Arad, and Ader,

AKJV: And Zebadiah, and Arad, and Ader,

ASV: and Zebadiah, and Arad, and Eder,

YLT: and Zebadiah, and Arad, and Ader,

Exposition: 1Chronicles 8:15 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Zebadiah, and Arad, and Ader,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 8:16

Hebrew

וּמִיכָאֵל וְיִשְׁפָּה וְיוֹחָא בְּנֵי בְרִיעָֽה׃

vmiykha'el-veyishefah-veyvocha'-veney-veriy'ah

KJV: And Michael, and Ispah, and Joha, the sons of Beriah;

AKJV: And Michael, and Ispah, and Joha, the sons of Beriah;

ASV: and Michael, and Ishpah, and Joha, the sons of Beriah,

YLT: and Michael, and Ispah, and Joha, sons of Beriah,

Exposition: 1Chronicles 8:16 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Michael, and Ispah, and Joha, the sons of Beriah;'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 8:17

Hebrew

וּזְבַדְיָה וּמְשֻׁלָּם וְחִזְקִי וָחָֽבֶר׃

vzevadeyah-vmeshulam-vechizeqiy-vachaver

KJV: And Zebadiah, and Meshullam, and Hezeki, and Heber,

AKJV: And Zebadiah, and Meshullam, and Hezeki, and Heber,

ASV: and Zebadiah, and Meshullam, and Hizki, and Heber,

YLT: and Zebadiah, and Meshullam, and Hezeki, and Heber,

Exposition: 1Chronicles 8:17 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Zebadiah, and Meshullam, and Hezeki, and Heber,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 8:18

Hebrew

וְיִשְׁמְרַי וְיִזְלִיאָה וְיוֹבָב בְּנֵי אֶלְפָּֽעַל׃

veyishemeray-veyizeliy'ah-veyvovav-veney-'elefa'al

KJV: Ishmerai also, and Jezliah, and Jobab, the sons of Elpaal;

AKJV: Ishmerai also, and Jezliah, and Jobab, the sons of Elpaal;

ASV: and Ishmerai, and Izliah, and Jobab, the sons of Elpaal,

YLT: and Ishmerai, and Jezliah, and Jobab, sons of Elpaal;

Exposition: 1Chronicles 8:18 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Ishmerai also, and Jezliah, and Jobab, the sons of Elpaal;'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 8:19

Hebrew

וְיָקִים וְזִכְרִי וְזַבְדִּֽי׃

veyaqiym-vezikheriy-vezavediy

KJV: And Jakim, and Zichri, and Zabdi,

AKJV: And Jakim, and Zichri, and Zabdi,

ASV: and Jakim, and Zichri, and Zabdi,

YLT: And Jakim, and Zichri, and Zabdi,

Exposition: 1Chronicles 8:19 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Jakim, and Zichri, and Zabdi,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 8:20

Hebrew

וֶאֱלִיעֵנַי וְצִלְּתַי וֶאֱלִיאֵֽל׃

ve'eliy'enay-vetziletay-ve'eliy'el

KJV: And Elienai, and Zilthai, and Eliel,

AKJV: And Elienai, and Zilthai, and Eliel,

ASV: and Elienai, and Zillethai, and Eliel,

YLT: and Elienai, and Zillethai, and Eliel,

Exposition: 1Chronicles 8:20 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Elienai, and Zilthai, and Eliel,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 8:21

Hebrew

וַעֲדָיָה וּבְרָאיָה וְשִׁמְרָת בְּנֵי שִׁמְעִֽי׃

va'adayah-vvera'yah-veshimerat-veney-shime'iy

KJV: And Adaiah, and Beraiah, and Shimrath, the sons of Shimhi;

AKJV: And Adaiah, and Beraiah, and Shimrath, the sons of Shimhi;

ASV: and Adaiah, and Beraiah, and Shimrath, the sons of Shimei,

YLT: and Adaiah, and Beraiah, and Shimrath, sons of Shimei;

Exposition: 1Chronicles 8:21 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Adaiah, and Beraiah, and Shimrath, the sons of Shimhi;'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 8:22

Hebrew

וְיִשְׁפָּן וָעֵבֶר וֶאֱלִיאֵֽל׃

veyishefan-va'ever-ve'eliy'el

KJV: And Ishpan, and Heber, and Eliel,

AKJV: And Ishpan, and Heber, and Eliel,

ASV: and Ishpan, and Eber, and Eliel,

YLT: And Ishpan, and Heber, and Eliel,

Exposition: 1Chronicles 8:22 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Ishpan, and Heber, and Eliel,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 8:23

Hebrew

וְעַבְדּוֹן וְזִכְרִי וְחָנָֽן׃

ve'avedvon-vezikheriy-vechanan

KJV: And Abdon, and Zichri, and Hanan,

AKJV: And Abdon, and Zichri, and Hanan,

ASV: and Abdon, and Zichri, and Hanan,

YLT: and Abdon, and Zichri, and Hanan,

Exposition: 1Chronicles 8:23 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Abdon, and Zichri, and Hanan,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 8:24

Hebrew

וַחֲנַנְיָה וְעֵילָם וְעַנְתֹתִיָּֽה׃

vachananeyah-ve'eylam-ve'anetotiyah

KJV: And Hananiah, and Elam, and Antothijah,

AKJV: And Hananiah, and Elam, and Antothijah,

ASV: and Hananiah, and Elam, and Anthothijah,

YLT: and Hananiah, and Elam, and Antothijah,

Exposition: 1Chronicles 8:24 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Hananiah, and Elam, and Antothijah,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 8:25

Hebrew

וְיִפְדְיָה ופניאל וּפְנוּאֵל בְּנֵי שָׁשָֽׁק׃

veyifedeyah-vfny'l-vfenv'el-veney-shashaq

KJV: And Iphedeiah, and Penuel, the sons of Shashak;

AKJV: And Iphedeiah, and Penuel, the sons of Shashak;

ASV: and Iphdeiah, and Penuel, the sons of Shashak,

YLT: and Iphedeiah, and Penuel, sons of Shashak;

Exposition: 1Chronicles 8:25 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Iphedeiah, and Penuel, the sons of Shashak;'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 8:26

Hebrew

וְשַׁמְשְׁרַי וּשְׁחַרְיָה וַעֲתַלְיָֽה׃

veshamesheray-vshechareyah-va'ataleyah

KJV: And Shamsherai, and Shehariah, and Athaliah,

AKJV: And Shamsherai, and Shehariah, and Athaliah,

ASV: and Shamsherai, and Shehariah, and Athaliah,

YLT: And Shamsherai, and Shehariah, and Athaliah,

Exposition: 1Chronicles 8:26 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Shamsherai, and Shehariah, and Athaliah,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 8:27

Hebrew

וְיַעֲרֶשְׁיָה וְאֵלִיָּה וְזִכְרִי בְּנֵי יְרֹחָֽם׃

veya'aresheyah-ve'eliyah-vezikheriy-veney-yerocham

KJV: And Jaresiah, and Eliah, and Zichri, the sons of Jeroham.

AKJV: And Jaresiah, and Eliah, and Zichri, the sons of Jeroham.

ASV: and Jaareshiah, and Elijah, and Zichri, the sons of Jeroham.

YLT: and Jaareshiah, and Eliah, and Zichri, sons of Jeroham.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 8:27 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Jaresiah, and Eliah, and Zichri, the sons of Jeroham.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 8:28

Hebrew

אֵלֶּה רָאשֵׁי אָבוֹת לְתֹלְדוֹתָם רָאשִׁים אֵלֶּה יָשְׁבוּ בִירוּשָׁלָֽ͏ִם׃

'eleh-ra'shey-'avvot-letoledvotam-ra'shiym-'eleh-yashevv-viyrvshalaim

KJV: These were heads of the fathers, by their generations, chief men. These dwelt in Jerusalem.

AKJV: These were heads of the fathers, by their generations, chief men. These dwelled in Jerusalem.

ASV: These were heads of fathers’ houses throughout their generations, chief men: these dwelt in Jerusalem.

YLT: These are heads of fathers, by their generations, heads; these dwelt in Jerusalem.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 8:28 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'These were heads of the fathers, by their generations, chief men. These dwelt in Jerusalem.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 8:29

Hebrew

וּבְגִבְעוֹן יָשְׁבוּ אֲבִי גִבְעוֹן וְשֵׁם אִשְׁתּוֹ מַעֲכָֽה׃

vvegive'von-yashevv-'aviy-give'von-veshem-'ishetvo-ma'akhah

KJV: And at Gibeon dwelt the father of Gibeon; whose wife’s name was Maachah:

AKJV: And at Gibeon dwelled the father of Gibeon; whose wife’s name was Maachah:

ASV: And in Gibeon there dwelt the father of Gibeon, Jeiel, whose wife’s name was Maacah;

YLT: And in Gibeon hath the father of Gibeon dwelt, and the name of his wife is Maachah;

Exposition: 1Chronicles 8:29 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And at Gibeon dwelt the father of Gibeon; whose wife’s name was Maachah:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 8:30

Hebrew

וּבְנוֹ הַבְּכוֹר עַבְדּוֹן וְצוּר וְקִישׁ וּבַעַל וְנָדָֽב׃

vvenvo-havekhvor-'avedvon-vetzvr-veqiysh-vva'al-venadav

KJV: And his firstborn son Abdon, and Zur, and Kish, and Baal, and Nadab,

AKJV: And his firstborn son Abdon, and Zur, and Kish, and Baal, and Nadab,

ASV: and his first-born son Abdon, and Zur, and Kish, and Baal, and Nadab,

YLT: and his son, the first-born, is Abdon, and Zur, and Kish, and Baal, and Nadab,

Exposition: 1Chronicles 8:30 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And his firstborn son Abdon, and Zur, and Kish, and Baal, and Nadab,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 8:31

Hebrew

וּגְדוֹר וְאַחְיוֹ וָזָֽכֶר׃

vgedvor-ve'acheyvo-vazakher

KJV: And Gedor, and Ahio, and Zacher.

AKJV: And Gedor, and Ahio, and Zacher.

ASV: and Gedor, and Ahio, and Zecher.

YLT: and Gedor, and Ahio, and Zacher;

Exposition: 1Chronicles 8:31 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Gedor, and Ahio, and Zacher.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 8:32

Hebrew

וּמִקְלוֹת הוֹלִיד אֶת־שִׁמְאָה וְאַף־הֵמָּה נֶגֶד אֲחֵיהֶם יָשְׁבוּ בִירוּשָׁלַ͏ִם עִם־אֲחֵיהֶֽם׃

vmiqelvot-hvoliyd-'et-shime'ah-ve'af-hemah-neged-'acheyhem-yashevv-viyrvshalaim-'im-'acheyhem

KJV: And Mikloth begat Shimeah. And these also dwelt with their brethren in Jerusalem, over against them.

AKJV: And Mikloth begat Shimeah. And these also dwelled with their brothers in Jerusalem, over against them. ¶

ASV: And Mikloth begat Shimeah. And they also dwelt with their brethren in Jerusalem, over against their brethren.

YLT: and Mikloth begat Shimeah. And they also over-against their brethren dwelt in Jerusalem with their brethren.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 8:32 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Mikloth begat Shimeah. And these also dwelt with their brethren in Jerusalem, over against them.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 8:33

Hebrew

וְנֵר הוֹלִיד אֶת־קִישׁ וְקִישׁ הוֹלִיד אֶת־שָׁאוּל וְשָׁאוּל הוֹלִיד אֶת־יְהֽוֹנָתָן וְאֶת־מַלְכִּי־שׁוּעַ וְאֶת־אֲבִֽינָדָב וְאֶת־אֶשְׁבָּֽעַל׃

vener-hvoliyd-'et-qiysh-veqiysh-hvoliyd-'et-sha'vl-vesha'vl-hvoliyd-'et-yehvonatan-ve'et-malekhiy-shv'a-ve'et-'aviynadav-ve'et-'esheva'al

KJV: And Ner begat Kish, and Kish begat Saul, and Saul begat Jonathan, and Malchi–shua, and Abinadab, and Esh–baal.

AKJV: And Ner begat Kish, and Kish begat Saul, and Saul begat Jonathan, and Malchishua, and Abinadab, and Eshbaal.

ASV: And Ner begat Kish; and Kish begat Saul; and Saul begat Jonathan, and Malchi-shua, and Abinadab, and Eshbaal.

YLT: And Ner begat Kish, and Kish begat Saul, and Saul begat Jonathan, and Malchi-Shua, and Abinadab, and Esh-Baal.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 8:33 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Ner begat Kish, and Kish begat Saul, and Saul begat Jonathan, and Malchi–shua, and Abinadab, and Esh–baal.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 8:34

Hebrew

וּבֶן־יְהוֹנָתָן מְרִיב בָּעַל וּמְרִיב בַּעַל הוֹלִיד אֶת־מִיכָֽה׃

vven-yehvonatan-meriyv-va'al-vmeriyv-va'al-hvoliyd-'et-miykhah

KJV: And the son of Jonathan was Merib–baal; and Merib–baal begat Micah.

AKJV: And the son of Jonathan was Meribbaal; and Meribbaal begat Micah.

ASV: And the son of Jonathan was Merib-baal; and Merib-baal begat Micah.

YLT: And a son of Jonathan is Merib-Baal, and Merib-Baal begat Micah;

Exposition: 1Chronicles 8:34 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And the son of Jonathan was Merib–baal; and Merib–baal begat Micah.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 8:35

Hebrew

וּבְנֵי מִיכָה פִּיתוֹן וָמֶלֶךְ וְתַאְרֵעַ וְאָחָֽז׃

vveney-miykhah-fiytvon-vamelekhe-veta'ere'a-ve'achaz

KJV: And the sons of Micah were, Pithon, and Melech, and Tarea, and Ahaz.

AKJV: And the sons of Micah were, Pithon, and Melech, and Tarea, and Ahaz.

ASV: And the sons of Micah: Pithon, and Melech, and Tarea, and Ahaz.

YLT: and sons of Micah: Pithon, and Melech, and Tarea, and Ahaz:

Exposition: 1Chronicles 8:35 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And the sons of Micah were, Pithon, and Melech, and Tarea, and Ahaz.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 8:36

Hebrew

וְאָחָז הוֹלִיד אֶת־יְהוֹעַדָּה וִיהֽוֹעַדָּה הוֹלִיד אֶת־עָלֶמֶת וְאֶת־עַזְמָוֶת וְאֶת־זִמְרִי וְזִמְרִי הוֹלִיד אֶת־מוֹצָֽא׃

ve'achaz-hvoliyd-'et-yehvo'adah-viyhvo'adah-hvoliyd-'et-'alemet-ve'et-'azemavet-ve'et-zimeriy-vezimeriy-hvoliyd-'et-mvotza'

KJV: And Ahaz begat Jehoadah; and Jehoadah begat Alemeth, and Azmaveth, and Zimri; and Zimri begat Moza,

AKJV: And Ahaz begat Jehoadah; and Jehoadah begat Alemeth, and Azmaveth, and Zimri; and Zimri begat Moza,

ASV: And Ahaz begat Jehoaddah; and Jehoaddah begat Alemeth, and Azmaveth, and Zimri; and Zimri begat Moza.

YLT: and Ahaz begat Jehoadah, and Jehoadah begat Alemeth, and Azmaveth, and Zimri; and Zimri begat Moza,

Exposition: 1Chronicles 8:36 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Ahaz begat Jehoadah; and Jehoadah begat Alemeth, and Azmaveth, and Zimri; and Zimri begat Moza,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 8:37

Hebrew

וּמוֹצָא הוֹלִיד אֶת־בִּנְעָא רָפָה בְנוֹ אֶלְעָשָׂה בְנוֹ אָצֵל בְּנֽוֹ׃

vmvotza'-hvoliyd-'et-vine'a'-rafah-venvo-'ele'ashah-venvo-'atzel-venvo

KJV: And Moza begat Binea: Rapha was his son, Eleasah his son, Azel his son:

AKJV: And Moza begat Binea: Rapha was his son, Eleasah his son, Azel his son:

ASV: And Moza begat Binea; Raphah was his son, Eleasah his son, Azel his son.

YLT: and Moza begat Binea, Raphah is his son, Eleasah his son, Azel his son.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 8:37 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Moza begat Binea: Rapha was his son, Eleasah his son, Azel his son:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 8:38

Hebrew

וּלְאָצֵל שִׁשָּׁה בָנִים וְאֵלֶּה שְׁמוֹתָם עַזְרִיקָם ׀ בֹּכְרוּ וְיִשְׁמָעֵאל וּשְׁעַרְיָה וְעֹבַדְיָה וְחָנָן כָּל־אֵלֶּה בְּנֵי אָצַֽל׃

vle'atzel-shishah-vaniym-ve'eleh-shemvotam-'azeriyqam- -vokherv-veyishema'e'l-vshe'areyah-ve'ovadeyah-vechanan-khal-'eleh-veney-'atzal

KJV: And Azel had six sons, whose names are these, Azrikam, Bocheru, and Ishmael, and Sheariah, and Obadiah, and Hanan. All these were the sons of Azel.

AKJV: And Azel had six sons, whose names are these, Azrikam, Bocheru, and Ishmael, and Sheariah, and Obadiah, and Hanan. All these were the sons of Azel.

ASV: And Azel had six sons, whose names are these: Azrikam, Bocheru, and Ishmael, and Sheariah, and Obadiah, and Hanan. All these were the sons of Azel.

YLT: And to Azel are six sons, and these are their names: Azrikam, Bocheru, and Ishmael, and Sheariah, and Obadiah, and Hanan. All these are sons of Azel.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 8:38 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Azel had six sons, whose names are these, Azrikam, Bocheru, and Ishmael, and Sheariah, and Obadiah, and Hanan. All these were the sons of Azel.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 8:39

Hebrew

וּבְנֵי עֵשֶׁק אָחִיו אוּלָם בְּכֹרוֹ יְעוּשׁ הַשֵּׁנִי וֽ͏ֶאֱלִיפֶלֶט הַשְּׁלִשִֽׁי׃

vveney-'esheq-'achiyv-'vlam-vekhorvo-ye'vsh-hasheniy-ve'eliyfelet-hashelishiy

KJV: And the sons of Eshek his brother were, Ulam his firstborn, Jehush the second, and Eliphelet the third.

AKJV: And the sons of Eshek his brother were, Ulam his firstborn, Jehush the second, and Eliphelet the third.

ASV: And the sons of Eshek his brother: Ulam his first-born, Jeush the second, and Eliphelet the third.

YLT: And sons of Eshek his brother: Ulam his first-born, Jehush the second, and Eliphelet the third.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 8:39 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And the sons of Eshek his brother were, Ulam his firstborn, Jehush the second, and Eliphelet the third.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

1Chronicles 8:40

Hebrew

וַֽיִּהְיוּ בְנֵי־אוּלָם אֲנָשִׁים גִּבֹּרֵי־חַיִל דֹּרְכֵי קֶשֶׁת וּמַרְבִּים בָּנִים וּבְנֵי בָנִים מֵאָה וַחֲמִשִּׁים כָּל־אֵלֶּה מִבְּנֵי בִנְיָמִֽן׃

vayiheyv-veney-'vlam-'anashiym-givorey-chayil-dorekhey-qeshet-vmareviym-vaniym-vveney-vaniym-me'ah-vachamishiym-khal-'eleh-miveney-vineyamin

KJV: And the sons of Ulam were mighty men of valour, archers, and had many sons, and sons’ sons, an hundred and fifty. All these are of the sons of Benjamin.

AKJV: And the sons of Ulam were mighty men of valor, archers, and had many sons, and sons’ sons, an hundred and fifty. All these are of the sons of Benjamin.

ASV: And the sons of Ulam were mighty men of valor, archers, and had many sons, and sons’ sons, a hundred and fifty. All these were of the sons of Benjamin.

YLT: And the sons of Ulam are men mighty in valour, treading bow, and multiplying sons and son's sons, a hundred and fifty. All these are of the sons of Benjamin.

Exposition: 1Chronicles 8:40 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And the sons of Ulam were mighty men of valour, archers, and had many sons, and sons’ sons, an hundred and fifty. All these are of the sons of Benjamin.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.