Apologetics Bible

Joshua 19:1

Hebrew

וַיֵּצֵא הַגּוֹרָל הַשֵּׁנִי לְשִׁמְעוֹן לְמַטֵּה בְנֵֽי־שִׁמְעוֹן לְמִשְׁפְּחוֹתָם וַֽיְהִי נַֽחֲלָתָם בְּתוֹךְ נַחֲלַת בְּנֵֽי־יְהוּדָֽה׃

vayetze'-hagvoral-hasheniy-leshime'von-lemateh-veney-shime'von-lemishefechvotam-vayehiy-nachalatam-vetvokhe-nachalat-veney-yehvdah

KJV: And the second lot came forth to Simeon, even for the tribe of the children of Simeon according to their families: and their inheritance was within the inheritance of the children of Judah.

AKJV: And the second lot came forth to Simeon, even for the tribe of the children of Simeon according to their families: and their inheritance was within the inheritance of the children of Judah.

ASV: And the second lot came out for Simeon, even for the tribe of the children of Simeon according to their families: and their inheritance was in the midst of the inheritance of the children of Judah.

YLT: And the second lot goeth out for Simeon, for the tribe of the sons of Simeon, for their families; and their inheritance is in the midst of the inheritance of the sons of Judah,

Exposition: Joshua 19:1 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And the second lot came forth to Simeon, even for the tribe of the children of Simeon according to their families: and their inheritance was within the inheritance of the children of Judah.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Joshua 19:2

Hebrew

וַיְהִי לָהֶם בְּנַֽחֲלָתָם בְּאֵֽר־שֶׁבַע וְשֶׁבַע וּמוֹלָדָֽה׃

vayehiy-lahem-venachalatam-ve'er-sheva'-vesheva'-vmvoladah

KJV: And they had in their inheritance Beer–sheba, Sheba, and Moladah,

AKJV: And they had in their inheritance Beersheba, and Sheba, and Moladah,

ASV: And they had for their inheritance Beer-sheba, or Sheba, and Moladah,

YLT: and they have in their inheritance Beer-Sheba, and Sheba, and Moladah,

Exposition: Joshua 19:2 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And they had in their inheritance Beer–sheba, Sheba, and Moladah,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Joshua 19:3

Hebrew

וַחֲצַר שׁוּעָל וּבָלָה וָעָֽצֶם׃

vachatzar-shv'al-vvalah-va'atzem

KJV: And Hazar–shual, and Balah, and Azem,

AKJV: And Hazarshual, and Balah, and Azem,

ASV: and Hazar-shual, and Balah, and Ezem,

YLT: and Hazar-Shual, and Balah, and Azem,

Exposition: Joshua 19:3 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Hazar–shual, and Balah, and Azem,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Joshua 19:4

Hebrew

וְאֶלְתּוֹלַד וּבְתוּל וְחָרְמָֽה׃

ve'eletvolad-vvetvl-vecharemah

KJV: And Eltolad, and Bethul, and Hormah,

AKJV: And Eltolad, and Bethul, and Hormah,

ASV: and Eltolad, and Bethul, and Hormah,

YLT: and Eltolad, and Bethul, and Hormah,

Exposition: Joshua 19:4 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Eltolad, and Bethul, and Hormah,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Joshua 19:5

Hebrew

וְצִֽקְלַג וּבֵית־הַמַּרְכָּבוֹת וַחֲצַר סוּסָֽה׃

vetziqelag-vveyt-hamarekhavvot-vachatzar-svsah

KJV: And Ziklag, and Beth–marcaboth, and Hazar–susah,

AKJV: And Ziklag, and Bethmarcaboth, and Hazarsusah,

ASV: and Ziklag, and Beth-marcaboth, and Hazar-susah,

YLT: and Ziklag, and Beth-Marcaboth, and Hazar-Susah,

Exposition: Joshua 19:5 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Ziklag, and Beth–marcaboth, and Hazar–susah,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Joshua 19:6

Hebrew

וּבֵית לְבָאוֹת וְשָֽׁרוּחֶן עָרִים שְׁלֹשׁ־עֶשְׂרֵה וְחַצְרֵיהֶֽן׃

vveyt-leva'vot-vesharvchen-'ariym-shelosh-'eshereh-vechatzereyhen

KJV: And Beth–lebaoth, and Sharuhen; thirteen cities and their villages:

AKJV: And Bethlebaoth, and Sharuhen; thirteen cities and their villages:

ASV: and Beth-lebaoth, and Sharuhen; thirteen cities with their villages:

YLT: and Beth-Lebaoth, and Sharuhen; thirteen cities and their villages.

Exposition: Joshua 19:6 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Beth–lebaoth, and Sharuhen; thirteen cities and their villages:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Joshua 19:7

Hebrew

עַיִן ׀ רִמּוֹן וָעֶתֶר וְעָשָׁן עָרִים אַרְבַּע וְחַצְרֵיהֶֽן׃

'ayin- -rimvon-va'eter-ve'ashan-'ariym-'areva'-vechatzereyhen

KJV: Ain, Remmon, and Ether, and Ashan; four cities and their villages:

AKJV: Ain, Remmon, and Ether, and Ashan; four cities and their villages:

ASV: Ain, Rimmon, and Ether, and Ashan; four cities with their villages:

YLT: Ain, Remmon, and Ether, and Ashan; four cities and their villages;

Exposition: Joshua 19:7 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Ain, Remmon, and Ether, and Ashan; four cities and their villages:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Joshua 19:8

Hebrew

וְכָל־הֽ͏ַחֲצֵרִים אֲשֶׁר סְבִיבוֹת הֶֽעָרִים הָאֵלֶּה עַד־בַּֽעֲלַת בְּאֵר רָאמַת נֶגֶב זֹאת נַחֲלַת מַטֵּה בְנֵֽי־שִׁמְעוֹן לְמִשְׁפְּחֹתָֽם׃

vekhal-hachatzeriym-'asher-seviyvvot-he'ariym-ha'eleh-'ad-va'alat-ve'er-ra'mat-negev-zo't-nachalat-mateh-veney-shime'von-lemishefechotam

KJV: And all the villages that were round about these cities to Baalath–beer, Ramath of the south. This is the inheritance of the tribe of the children of Simeon according to their families.

AKJV: And all the villages that were round about these cities to Baalathbeer, Ramath of the south. This is the inheritance of the tribe of the children of Simeon according to their families.

ASV: and all the villages that were round about these cities to Baalath-beer, Ramah of the South. This is the inheritance of the tribe of the children of Simeon according to their families.

YLT: also all the villages which are round about these cities, unto Baalath-Beer, Ramoth of the south. This is the inheritance of the tribe of the sons of Simeon, for their families;

Exposition: Joshua 19:8 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And all the villages that were round about these cities to Baalath–beer, Ramath of the south. This is the inheritance of the tribe of the children of Simeon according to their families.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Joshua 19:9

Hebrew

מֵחֶבֶל בְּנֵי יְהוּדָה נַחֲלַת בְּנֵי שִׁמְעוֹן כִּֽי־הָיָה חֵלֶק בְּנֵֽי־יְהוּדָה רַב מֵהֶם וַיִּנְחֲלוּ בְנֵֽי־שִׁמְעוֹן בְּתוֹךְ נַחֲלָתָֽם׃

mechevel-veney-yehvdah-nachalat-veney-shime'von-khiy-hayah-cheleq-veney-yehvdah-rav-mehem-vayinechalv-veney-shime'von-vetvokhe-nachalatam

KJV: Out of the portion of the children of Judah was the inheritance of the children of Simeon: for the part of the children of Judah was too much for them: therefore the children of Simeon had their inheritance within the inheritance of them.

AKJV: Out of the portion of the children of Judah was the inheritance of the children of Simeon: for the part of the children of Judah was too much for them: therefore the children of Simeon had their inheritance within the inheritance of them. ¶

ASV: Out of the part of the children of Judah was the inheritance of the children of Simeon; for the portion of the children of Judah was too much for them: therefore the children of Simeon had inheritance in the midst of their inheritance.

YLT: out of the portion of the sons of Judah is the inheritance of the sons of Simeon, for the portion of the sons of Judah hath been too much for them, and the sons of Simeon inherit in the midst of their inheritance.

Exposition: Joshua 19:9 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Out of the portion of the children of Judah was the inheritance of the children of Simeon: for the part of the children of Judah was too much for them: therefore the children of Simeon had their inheritance within the...'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Joshua 19:10

Hebrew

וַיַּעַל הַגּוֹרָל הַשְּׁלִישִׁי לִבְנֵי זְבוּלֻן לְמִשְׁפְּחֹתָם וַיְהִי גְּבוּל נַחֲלָתָם עַד־שָׂרִֽיד׃

vaya'al-hagvoral-hasheliyshiy-liveney-zevvlun-lemishefechotam-vayehiy-gevvl-nachalatam-'ad-shariyd

KJV: And the third lot came up for the children of Zebulun according to their families: and the border of their inheritance was unto Sarid:

AKJV: And the third lot came up for the children of Zebulun according to their families: and the border of their inheritance was to Sarid:

ASV: And the third lot came up for the children of Zebulun according to their families. And the border of their inheritance was unto Sarid;

YLT: And the third lot goeth up for the sons of Zebulun, for their families; and the border of their inheritance is unto Sarid,

Exposition: Joshua 19:10 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And the third lot came up for the children of Zebulun according to their families: and the border of their inheritance was unto Sarid:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Joshua 19:11

Hebrew

וְעָלָה גְבוּלָם ׀ לַיָּמָּה וּמַרְעֲלָה וּפָגַע בְּדַבָּשֶׁת וּפָגַע אֶל־הַנַּחַל אֲשֶׁר עַל־פְּנֵי יָקְנְעָֽם׃

ve'alah-gevvlam- -layamah-vmare'alah-vfaga'-vedavashet-vfaga'-'el-hanachal-'asher-'al-feney-yaqene'am

KJV: And their border went up toward the sea, and Maralah, and reached to Dabbasheth, and reached to the river that is before Jokneam;

AKJV: And their border went up toward the sea, and Maralah, and reached to Dabbasheth, and reached to the river that is before Jokneam;

ASV: and their border went up westward, even to Maralah, and reached to Dabbesheth; and it reached to the brook that is before Jokneam;

YLT: and their border hath gone up towards the sea, and Maralah, and come against Dabbasheth, and come unto the brook which is on the front of Jokneam,

Exposition: Joshua 19:11 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And their border went up toward the sea, and Maralah, and reached to Dabbasheth, and reached to the river that is before Jokneam;'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Joshua 19:12

Hebrew

וְשָׁב מִשָּׂרִיד קֵדְמָה מִזְרַח הַשֶּׁמֶשׁ עַל־גְּבוּל כִּסְלֹת תָּבֹר וְיָצָא אֶל־הַדָּֽבְרַת וְעָלָה יָפִֽיעַ׃

veshav-mishariyd-qedemah-mizerach-hashemesh-'al-gevvl-khiselot-tavor-veyatza'-'el-hadaverat-ve'alah-yafiy'a

KJV: And turned from Sarid eastward toward the sunrising unto the border of Chisloth–tabor, and then goeth out to Daberath, and goeth up to Japhia,

AKJV: And turned from Sarid eastward toward the sun rise to the border of Chislothtabor, and then goes out to Daberath, and goes up to Japhia,

ASV: and it turned from Sarid eastward toward the sunrising unto the border of Chisloth-tabor; and it went out to Daberath, and went up to Japhia;

YLT: and turned back from Sarid eastward, at the sun-rising, by the border of Chisloth-Tabor, and gone out unto Daberath, and gone up to Japhia,

Exposition: Joshua 19:12 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And turned from Sarid eastward toward the sunrising unto the border of Chisloth–tabor, and then goeth out to Daberath, and goeth up to Japhia,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Joshua 19:13

Hebrew

וּמִשָּׁם עָבַר קֵדְמָה מִזְרָחָה גִּתָּה חֵפֶר עִתָּה קָצִין וְיָצָא רִמּוֹן הַמְּתֹאָר הַנֵּעָֽה׃

vmisham-'avar-qedemah-mizerachah-gitah-chefer-'itah-qatziyn-veyatza'-rimvon-hameto'ar-hane'ah

KJV: And from thence passeth on along on the east to Gittah–hepher, to Ittah–kazin, and goeth out to Remmon–methoar to Neah;

AKJV: And from there passes on along on the east to Gittahhepher, to Ittahkazin, and goes out to Remmonmethoar to Neah;

ASV: and from thence it passed along eastward to Gath-hepher, to Eth-kazin; and it went out at Rimmon which stretcheth unto Neah;

YLT: and thence it hath passed over eastward, to the east, to Gittah-Hepher, to Ittah-Kazin, and gone out to Rimmon-Methoar to Neah;

Exposition: Joshua 19:13 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And from thence passeth on along on the east to Gittah–hepher, to Ittah–kazin, and goeth out to Remmon–methoar to Neah;'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Joshua 19:14

Hebrew

וְנָסַב אֹתוֹ הַגְּבוּל מִצְּפוֹן חַנָּתֹן וְהָיוּ תֹּֽצְאֹתָיו גֵּי יִפְתַּח־אֵֽל׃

venasav-'otvo-hagevvl-mitzefvon-chanaton-vehayv-totze'otayv-gey-yifetach-'el

KJV: And the border compasseth it on the north side to Hannathon: and the outgoings thereof are in the valley of Jiphthah–el:

AKJV: And the border compasses it on the north side to Hannathon: and the outgoings thereof are in the valley of Jiphthahel:

ASV: and the border turned about it on the north to Hannathon; and the goings out thereof were at the valley of Iphtah-el;

YLT: and the border hath gone round about it, from the north to Hannathon; and its outgoings have been in the valley of Jiphthah-El,

Exposition: Joshua 19:14 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And the border compasseth it on the north side to Hannathon: and the outgoings thereof are in the valley of Jiphthah–el:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Joshua 19:15

Hebrew

וְקַטָּת וְנֽ͏ַהֲלָל וְשִׁמְרוֹן וְיִדְאֲלָה וּבֵית לָחֶם עָרִים שְׁתֵּים־עֶשְׂרֵה וְחַצְרֵיהֶֽן׃

veqatat-venahalal-veshimervon-veyide'alah-vveyt-lachem-'ariym-sheteym-'eshereh-vechatzereyhen

KJV: And Kattath, and Nahallal, and Shimron, and Idalah, and Beth–lehem: twelve cities with their villages.

AKJV: And Kattath, and Nahallal, and Shimron, and Idalah, and Bethlehem: twelve cities with their villages.

ASV: and Kattath, and Nahalal, and Shimron, and Idalah, and Bethlehem: twelve cities with their villages.

YLT: and Kattath, and Nahallal, and Shimron, and Idalah, and Beth-Lehem; twelve cities and their villages.

Exposition: Joshua 19:15 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Kattath, and Nahallal, and Shimron, and Idalah, and Beth–lehem: twelve cities with their villages.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Joshua 19:16

Hebrew

זֹאת נַחֲלַת בְּנֵֽי־זְבוּלֻן לְמִשְׁפְּחוֹתָם הֶֽעָרִים הָאֵלֶּה וְחַצְרֵיהֶֽן׃

zo't-nachalat-veney-zevvlun-lemishefechvotam-he'ariym-ha'eleh-vechatzereyhen

KJV: This is the inheritance of the children of Zebulun according to their families, these cities with their villages.

AKJV: This is the inheritance of the children of Zebulun according to their families, these cities with their villages. ¶

ASV: This is the inheritance of the children of Zebulun according to their families, these cities with their villages.

YLT: This is the inheritance of the sons of Zebulun, for their families, these cities and their villages.

Exposition: Joshua 19:16 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'This is the inheritance of the children of Zebulun according to their families, these cities with their villages.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Joshua 19:17

Hebrew

לְיִשָׂשכָר יָצָא הַגּוֹרָל הָֽרְבִיעִי לִבְנֵי יִשָׂשכָר לְמִשְׁפְּחוֹתָֽם׃

leyishashkhar-yatza'-hagvoral-hareviy'iy-liveney-yishashkhar-lemishefechvotam

KJV: And the fourth lot came out to Issachar, for the children of Issachar according to their families.

AKJV: And the fourth lot came out to Issachar, for the children of Issachar according to their families.

ASV: The fourth lot came out for Issachar, even for the children of Issachar according to their families.

YLT: For Issachar hath the fourth lot gone out, for the sons of Issachar, for their families;

Exposition: Joshua 19:17 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And the fourth lot came out to Issachar, for the children of Issachar according to their families.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Joshua 19:18

Hebrew

וַיְהִי גְּבוּלָם יִזְרְעֶאלָה וְהַכְּסוּלֹת וְשׁוּנֵֽם׃

vayehiy-gevvlam-yizere'e'lah-vehakhesvlot-veshvnem

KJV: And their border was toward Jezreel, and Chesulloth, and Shunem,

AKJV: And their border was toward Jezreel, and Chesulloth, and Shunem,

ASV: And their border was unto Jezreel, and Chesulloth, and Shunem,

YLT: and their border is at Jezreel, and Chesulloth, and Shunem,

Exposition: Joshua 19:18 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And their border was toward Jezreel, and Chesulloth, and Shunem,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Joshua 19:19

Hebrew

וַחֲפָרַיִם וְשִׁיאֹן וַאֲנָחֲרַֽת׃

vachafarayim-veshiy'on-va'anacharat

KJV: And Hapharaim, and Shion, and Anaharath,

AKJV: And Haphraim, and Shihon, and Anaharath,

ASV: and Hapharaim, and Shion, and Anaharath,

YLT: and Haphraim, and Shihon, and Anaharath,

Exposition: Joshua 19:19 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Hapharaim, and Shion, and Anaharath,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Joshua 19:20

Hebrew

וְהָֽרַבִּית וְקִשְׁיוֹן וָאָֽבֶץ׃

veharaviyt-veqisheyvon-va'avetz

KJV: And Rabbith, and Kishion, and Abez,

AKJV: And Rabbith, and Kishion, and Abez,

ASV: and Rabbith, and Kishion, and Ebez,

YLT: and Rabbith, and Kishion, and Abez,

Exposition: Joshua 19:20 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Rabbith, and Kishion, and Abez,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Joshua 19:21

Hebrew

וְרֶמֶת וְעֵין־גַּנִּים וְעֵין חַדָּה וּבֵית פַּצֵּֽץ׃

veremet-ve'eyn-ganiym-ve'eyn-chadah-vveyt-fatzetz

KJV: And Remeth, and En–gannim, and En–haddah, and Beth–pazzez;

AKJV: And Remeth, and Engannim, and Enhaddah, and Bethpazzez;

ASV: and Remeth, and Engannim, and En-haddah, and Beth-pazzez,

YLT: and Remeth, and En-Gannim, and En-Haddah, and Beth-Pazzez;

Exposition: Joshua 19:21 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Remeth, and En–gannim, and En–haddah, and Beth–pazzez;'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Joshua 19:22

Hebrew

וּפָגַע הַגְּבוּל בְּתָבוֹר ושחצומה וְשַׁחֲצִימָה וּבֵית שֶׁמֶשׁ וְהָיוּ תֹּצְאוֹת גְּבוּלָם הַיַּרְדֵּן עָרִים שֵׁשׁ־עֶשְׂרֵה וְחַצְרֵיהֶֽן׃

vfaga'-hagevvl-vetavvor-vshchtzvmh-veshachatziymah-vveyt-shemesh-vehayv-totze'vot-gevvlam-hayareden-'ariym-shesh-'eshereh-vechatzereyhen

KJV: And the coast reacheth to Tabor, and Shahazimah, and Beth–shemesh; and the outgoings of their border were at Jordan: sixteen cities with their villages.

AKJV: And the coast reaches to Tabor, and Shahazimah, and Bethshemesh; and the outgoings of their border were at Jordan: sixteen cities with their villages.

ASV: and the border reached to Tabor, and Shahazumah, and Beth-shemesh; and the goings out of their border were at the Jordan: sixteen cities with their villages.

YLT: and the border hath touched against Tabor, and Shahazimah, and Beth-Shemesh, and the outgoings of their border have been at the Jordan; sixteen cities and their villages.

Exposition: Joshua 19:22 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And the coast reacheth to Tabor, and Shahazimah, and Beth–shemesh; and the outgoings of their border were at Jordan: sixteen cities with their villages.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Joshua 19:23

Hebrew

זֹאת נַחֲלַת מַטֵּה בְנֵֽי־יִשָׂשכָר לְמִשְׁפְּחֹתָם הֶעָרִים וְחַצְרֵיהֶֽן׃

zo't-nachalat-mateh-veney-yishashkhar-lemishefechotam-he'ariym-vechatzereyhen

KJV: This is the inheritance of the tribe of the children of Issachar according to their families, the cities and their villages.

AKJV: This is the inheritance of the tribe of the children of Issachar according to their families, the cities and their villages. ¶

ASV: This is the inheritance of the tribe of the children of Issachar according to their families, the cities with their villages.

YLT: This is the inheritance of the tribe of the sons of Issachar, for their families, the cities and their villages.

Exposition: Joshua 19:23 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'This is the inheritance of the tribe of the children of Issachar according to their families, the cities and their villages.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Joshua 19:24

Hebrew

וַיֵּצֵא הַגּוֹרָל הַֽחֲמִישִׁי לְמַטֵּה בְנֵֽי־אָשֵׁר לְמִשְׁפְּחוֹתָֽם׃

vayetze'-hagvoral-hachamiyshiy-lemateh-veney-'asher-lemishefechvotam

KJV: And the fifth lot came out for the tribe of the children of Asher according to their families.

AKJV: And the fifth lot came out for the tribe of the children of Asher according to their families.

ASV: And the fifth lot came out for the tribe of the children of Asher according to their families.

YLT: And the fifth lot goeth out for the tribe of the sons of Asher, for their families;

Exposition: Joshua 19:24 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And the fifth lot came out for the tribe of the children of Asher according to their families.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Joshua 19:25

Hebrew

וַיְהִי גְּבוּלָם חֶלְקַת וַחֲלִי וָבֶטֶן וְאַכְשָֽׁף׃

vayehiy-gevvlam-cheleqat-vachaliy-vaveten-ve'akheshaf

KJV: And their border was Helkath, and Hali, and Beten, and Achshaph,

AKJV: And their border was Helkath, and Hali, and Beten, and Achshaph,

ASV: And their border was Helkath, and Hali, and Beten, and Achshaph,

YLT: and their border is Helkath, and Hali, and Beten, and Achshaph,

Exposition: Joshua 19:25 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And their border was Helkath, and Hali, and Beten, and Achshaph,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Joshua 19:26

Hebrew

וְאַֽלַמֶּלֶךְ וְעַמְעָד וּמִשְׁאָל וּפָגַע בְּכַרְמֶל הַיָּמָּה וּבְשִׁיחוֹר לִבְנָֽת׃

ve'alamelekhe-ve'ame'ad-vmishe'al-vfaga'-vekharemel-hayamah-vveshiychvor-livenat

KJV: And Alammelech, and Amad, and Misheal; and reacheth to Carmel westward, and to Shihor–libnath;

AKJV: And Alammelech, and Amad, and Misheal; and reaches to Carmel westward, and to Shihorlibnath;

ASV: and Allammelech, and Amad, and Mishal; and it reached to Carmel westward, and to Shihor-libnath;

YLT: and Alammelech, and Amad, and Misheal; and it toucheth against Carmel westward, and against Shihor-Libnath;

Exposition: Joshua 19:26 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Alammelech, and Amad, and Misheal; and reacheth to Carmel westward, and to Shihor–libnath;'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Joshua 19:27

Hebrew

וְשָׁב מִזְרַח הַשֶּׁמֶשׁ בֵּית דָּגֹן וּפָגַע בִּזְבֻלוּן וּבְגֵי יִפְתַּח־אֵל צָפוֹנָה בֵּית הָעֵמֶק וּנְעִיאֵל וְיָצָא אֶל־כָּבוּל מִשְּׂמֹֽאל׃

veshav-mizerach-hashemesh-veyt-dagon-vfaga'-vizevulvn-vvegey-yifetach-'el-tzafvonah-veyt-ha'emeq-vne'iy'el-veyatza'-'el-khavvl-mishemo'l

KJV: And turneth toward the sunrising to Beth–dagon, and reacheth to Zebulun, and to the valley of Jiphthah–el toward the north side of Beth–emek, and Neiel, and goeth out to Cabul on the left hand,

AKJV: And turns toward the sun rise to Bethdagon, and reaches to Zebulun, and to the valley of Jiphthahel toward the north side of Bethemek, and Neiel, and goes out to Cabul on the left hand,

ASV: and it turned toward the sunrising to Beth-dagon, and reached to Zebulun, and to the valley of Iphtah-el northward to Beth-emek and Neiel; and it went out to Cabul on the left hand,

YLT: and hath turned back, at the sun-rising, to Beth-Dagon, and come against Zebulun, and against the valley of Jiphthah-El toward the north of Beth-Emek, and Neiel, and hath gone out unto Cabul on the left,

Exposition: Joshua 19:27 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And turneth toward the sunrising to Beth–dagon, and reacheth to Zebulun, and to the valley of Jiphthah–el toward the north side of Beth–emek, and Neiel, and goeth out to Cabul on the left hand,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Joshua 19:28

Hebrew

וְעֶבְרֹן וּרְחֹב וְחַמּוֹן וְקָנָה עַד צִידוֹן רַבָּֽה׃

ve'everon-vrechov-vechamvon-veqanah-'ad-tziydvon-ravah

KJV: And Hebron, and Rehob, and Hammon, and Kanah, even unto great Zidon;

AKJV: And Hebron, and Rehob, and Hammon, and Kanah, even to great Zidon;

ASV: and Ebron, and Rehob, and Hammon, and Kanah, even unto great Sidon;

YLT: and Hebron, and Rehob, and Hammon, and Kanah, unto great Zidon;

Exposition: Joshua 19:28 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Hebron, and Rehob, and Hammon, and Kanah, even unto great Zidon;'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Joshua 19:29

Hebrew

וְשָׁב הַגְּבוּל הָֽרָמָה וְעַד־עִיר מִבְצַר־צֹר וְשָׁב הַגְּבוּל חֹסָה ויהיו וְהָיוּ תֹצְאֹתָיו הַיָּמָּה מֵחֶבֶל אַכְזִֽיבָה׃

veshav-hagevvl-haramah-ve'ad-'iyr-mivetzar-tzor-veshav-hagevvl-chosah-vyhyv-vehayv-totze'otayv-hayamah-mechevel-'akheziyvah

KJV: And then the coast turneth to Ramah, and to the strong city Tyre; and the coast turneth to Hosah; and the outgoings thereof are at the sea from the coast to Achzib:

AKJV: And then the coast turns to Ramah, and to the strong city Tyre; and the coast turns to Hosah; and the outgoings thereof are at the sea from the coast to Achzib:

ASV: and the border turned to Ramah, and to the fortified city of Tyre; and the border turned to Hosah; and the goings out thereof were at the sea by the region of Achzib;

YLT: and the border hath turned back to Ramah, and unto the fenced city Tyre; and the border hath turned back to Hosah, and its outgoings are at the sea, from the coast to Achzib,

Exposition: Joshua 19:29 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And then the coast turneth to Ramah, and to the strong city Tyre; and the coast turneth to Hosah; and the outgoings thereof are at the sea from the coast to Achzib:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Joshua 19:30

Hebrew

וְעֻמָה וַאֲפֵק וּרְחֹב עָרִים עֶשְׂרִים וּשְׁתַּיִם וְחַצְרֵיהֶֽן׃

ve'umah-va'afeq-vrechov-'ariym-'esheriym-vshetayim-vechatzereyhen

KJV: Ummah also, and Aphek, and Rehob: twenty and two cities with their villages.

AKJV: Ummah also, and Aphek, and Rehob: twenty and two cities with their villages.

ASV: Ummah also, and Aphek, and Rehob: twenty and two cities with their villages.

YLT: and Ummah, and Aphek, and Rehob; twenty and two cities and their villages.

Exposition: Joshua 19:30 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Ummah also, and Aphek, and Rehob: twenty and two cities with their villages.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Joshua 19:31

Hebrew

זֹאת נַחֲלַת מַטֵּה בְנֵֽי־אָשֵׁר לְמִשְׁפְּחֹתָם הֶעָרִים הָאֵלֶּה וְחַצְרֵיהֶֽן׃

zo't-nachalat-mateh-veney-'asher-lemishefechotam-he'ariym-ha'eleh-vechatzereyhen

KJV: This is the inheritance of the tribe of the children of Asher according to their families, these cities with their villages.

AKJV: This is the inheritance of the tribe of the children of Asher according to their families, these cities with their villages. ¶

ASV: This is the inheritance of the tribe of the children of Asher according to their families, these cities with their villages.

YLT: This is the inheritance of the tribe of the sons of Asher, for their families, these cities and their villages.

Exposition: Joshua 19:31 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'This is the inheritance of the tribe of the children of Asher according to their families, these cities with their villages.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Joshua 19:32

Hebrew

לִבְנֵי נַפְתָּלִי יָצָא הַגּוֹרָל הַשִּׁשִּׁי לִבְנֵי נַפְתָּלִי לְמִשְׁפְּחֹתָֽם׃

liveney-nafetaliy-yatza'-hagvoral-hashishiy-liveney-nafetaliy-lemishefechotam

KJV: The sixth lot came out to the children of Naphtali, even for the children of Naphtali according to their families.

AKJV: The sixth lot came out to the children of Naphtali, even for the children of Naphtali according to their families.

ASV: The sixth lot came out for the children of Naphtali, even for the children of Naphtali according to their families.

YLT: For the sons of Naphtali hath the sixth lot gone out, for the sons of Naphtali, for their families;

Exposition: Joshua 19:32 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'The sixth lot came out to the children of Naphtali, even for the children of Naphtali according to their families.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Joshua 19:33

Hebrew

וַיְהִי גְבוּלָם מֵחֵלֶף מֵֽאֵלוֹן בְּצַעֲנַנִּים וַאֲדָמִי הַנֶּקֶב וְיַבְנְאֵל עַד־לַקּוּם וַיְהִי תֹצְאֹתָיו הַיַּרְדֵּֽן׃

vayehiy-gevvlam-mechelef-me'elvon-vetza'ananiym-va'adamiy-haneqev-veyavene'el-'ad-laqvm-vayehiy-totze'otayv-hayareden

KJV: And their coast was from Heleph, from Allon to Zaanannim, and Adami, Nekeb, and Jabneel, unto Lakum; and the outgoings thereof were at Jordan:

AKJV: And their coast was from Heleph, from Allon to Zaanannim, and Adami, Nekeb, and Jabneel, to Lakum; and the outgoings thereof were at Jordan:

ASV: And their border was from Heleph, from the oak in Zaanannim, and Adami-nekeb, and Jabneel, unto Lakkum; and the goings out thereof were at the Jordan;

YLT: and their border is from Heleph, from Allon in Zaanannim, and Adami, Nekeb, and Jabneel, unto Lakkum, and its outgoings are at the Jordan;

Exposition: Joshua 19:33 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And their coast was from Heleph, from Allon to Zaanannim, and Adami, Nekeb, and Jabneel, unto Lakum; and the outgoings thereof were at Jordan:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Joshua 19:34

Hebrew

וְשָׁב הַגְּבוּל יָמָּה אַזְנוֹת תָּבוֹר וְיָצָא מִשָּׁם חוּקֹקָה וּפָגַע בִּזְבֻלוּן מִנֶּגֶב וּבְאָשֵׁר פָּגַע מִיָּם וּבִיהוּדָה הַיַּרְדֵּן מִזְרַח הַשָּֽׁמֶשׁ׃

veshav-hagevvl-yamah-'azenvot-tavvor-veyatza'-misham-chvqoqah-vfaga'-vizevulvn-minegev-vve'asher-faga'-miyam-vviyhvdah-hayareden-mizerach-hashamesh

KJV: And then the coast turneth westward to Aznoth–tabor, and goeth out from thence to Hukkok, and reacheth to Zebulun on the south side, and reacheth to Asher on the west side, and to Judah upon Jordan toward the sunrising.

AKJV: And then the coast turns westward to Aznothtabor, and goes out from there to Hukkok, and reaches to Zebulun on the south side, and reaches to Asher on the west side, and to Judah on Jordan toward the sun rise.

ASV: and the border turned westward to Aznoth-tabor, and went out from thence to Hukkok; and it reached to Zebulun on the south, and reached to Asher on the west, and to Judah at the Jordan toward the sunrising.

YLT: and the border hath turned back westward to Aznoth-Tabor, and gone out thence to Hukkok, and touched against Zebulun on the south, and against Asher it hath touched on the west, and against Judah at the Jordan, at the sun-rising;

Exposition: Joshua 19:34 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And then the coast turneth westward to Aznoth–tabor, and goeth out from thence to Hukkok, and reacheth to Zebulun on the south side, and reacheth to Asher on the west side, and to Judah upon Jordan toward the sunrising.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Joshua 19:35

Hebrew

וְעָרֵי מִבְצָר הַצִּדִּים צֵר וְחַמַּת רַקַּת וְכִנָּֽרֶת׃

ve'arey-mivetzar-hatzidiym-tzer-vechamat-raqat-vekhinaret

KJV: And the fenced cities are Ziddim, Zer, and Hammath, Rakkath, and Chinnereth,

AKJV: And the fenced cities are Ziddim, Zer, and Hammath, Rakkath, and Chinnereth,

ASV: And the fortified cities were Ziddim, Zer, and Hammath, Rakkath, and Chinnereth,

YLT: and the cities of defence are Ziddim, Zer, and Hammath, Rakkath, and Chinnereth,

Exposition: Joshua 19:35 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And the fenced cities are Ziddim, Zer, and Hammath, Rakkath, and Chinnereth,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Joshua 19:36

Hebrew

וַאֲדָמָה וְהָרָמָה וְחָצֽוֹר׃

va'adamah-veharamah-vechatzvor

KJV: And Adamah, and Ramah, and Hazor,

AKJV: And Adamah, and Ramah, and Hazor,

ASV: and Adamah, and Ramah, and Hazor,

YLT: and Adamah, and Ramah, and Hazor,

Exposition: Joshua 19:36 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Adamah, and Ramah, and Hazor,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Joshua 19:37

Hebrew

וְקֶדֶשׁ וְאֶדְרֶעִי וְעֵין חָצֽוֹר׃

veqedesh-ve'edere'iy-ve'eyn-chatzvor

KJV: And Kedesh, and Edrei, and En–hazor,

AKJV: And Kedesh, and Edrei, and Enhazor,

ASV: and Kedesh, and Edrei, and En-hazor,

YLT: and Kedesh, and Edrei, and En-Hazor,

Exposition: Joshua 19:37 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Kedesh, and Edrei, and En–hazor,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Joshua 19:38

Hebrew

וְיִרְאוֹן וּמִגְדַּל־אֵל חֳרֵם וּבֵית־עֲנָת וּבֵית שָׁמֶשׁ עָרִים תְּשַֽׁע־עֶשְׂרֵה וְחַצְרֵיהֶֽן׃

veyire'von-vmigedal-'el-chorem-vveyt-'anat-vveyt-shamesh-'ariym-tesha'-'eshereh-vechatzereyhen

KJV: And Iron, and Migdal–el, Horem, and Beth–anath, and Beth–shemesh; nineteen cities with their villages.

AKJV: And Iron, and Migdalel, Horem, and Bethanath, and Bethshemesh; nineteen cities with their villages.

ASV: and Iron, and Migdal-el, Horem, and Beth-anath, and Beth-shemesh; nineteen cities with their villages.

YLT: and Iron, and Migdal-El, Horem, and Beth-Anath, and Beth-Shemesh; nineteen cities and their villages.

Exposition: Joshua 19:38 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Iron, and Migdal–el, Horem, and Beth–anath, and Beth–shemesh; nineteen cities with their villages.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Joshua 19:39

Hebrew

זֹאת נַחֲלַת מַטֵּה בְנֵֽי־נַפְתָּלִי לְמִשְׁפְּחֹתָם הֶעָרִים וְחַצְרֵיהֶֽן׃

zo't-nachalat-mateh-veney-nafetaliy-lemishefechotam-he'ariym-vechatzereyhen

KJV: This is the inheritance of the tribe of the children of Naphtali according to their families, the cities and their villages.

AKJV: This is the inheritance of the tribe of the children of Naphtali according to their families, the cities and their villages. ¶

ASV: This is the inheritance of the tribe of the children of Naphtali according to their families, the cities with their villages.

YLT: This is the inheritance of the tribe of the sons of Naphtali, for their families, the cities and their villages.

Exposition: Joshua 19:39 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'This is the inheritance of the tribe of the children of Naphtali according to their families, the cities and their villages.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Joshua 19:40

Hebrew

לְמַטֵּה בְנֵי־דָן לְמִשְׁפְּחֹתָם יָצָא הַגּוֹרָל הַשְּׁבִיעִֽי׃

lemateh-veney-dan-lemishefechotam-yatza'-hagvoral-hasheviy'iy

KJV: And the seventh lot came out for the tribe of the children of Dan according to their families.

AKJV: And the seventh lot came out for the tribe of the children of Dan according to their families.

ASV: The seventh lot came out for the tribe of the children of Dan according to their families.

YLT: For the tribe of the sons of Dan, for their families, hath the seventh lot gone out;

Exposition: Joshua 19:40 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And the seventh lot came out for the tribe of the children of Dan according to their families.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Joshua 19:41

Hebrew

וַיְהִי גְּבוּל נַחֲלָתָם צָרְעָה וְאֶשְׁתָּאוֹל וְעִיר שָֽׁמֶשׁ׃

vayehiy-gevvl-nachalatam-tzare'ah-ve'esheta'vol-ve'iyr-shamesh

KJV: And the coast of their inheritance was Zorah, and Eshtaol, and Ir–shemesh,

AKJV: And the coast of their inheritance was Zorah, and Eshtaol, and Irshemesh,

ASV: And the border of their inheritance was Zorah, and Eshtaol, and Ir-shemesh,

YLT: and the border of their inheritance is Zorah, and Eshtaol, and Ir-Shemesh,

Exposition: Joshua 19:41 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And the coast of their inheritance was Zorah, and Eshtaol, and Ir–shemesh,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Joshua 19:42

Hebrew

וְשַֽׁעֲלַבִּין וְאַיָּלוֹן וְיִתְלָֽה׃

vesha'alaviyn-ve'ayalvon-veyitelah

KJV: And Shaalabbin, and Ajalon, and Jethlah,

AKJV: And Shaalabbin, and Ajalon, and Jethlah,

ASV: and Shaalabbin, and Aijalon, and Ithlah,

YLT: and Shalabbin, and Aijalon, and Jethlah,

Exposition: Joshua 19:42 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Shaalabbin, and Ajalon, and Jethlah,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Joshua 19:43

Hebrew

וְאֵילוֹן וְתִמְנָתָה וְעֶקְרֽוֹן׃

ve'eylvon-vetimenatah-ve'eqervon

KJV: And Elon, and Thimnathah, and Ekron,

AKJV: And Elon, and Thimnathah, and Ekron,

ASV: and Elon, and Timnah, and Ekron,

YLT: and Elon, and Thimnathah, and Ekron,

Exposition: Joshua 19:43 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Elon, and Thimnathah, and Ekron,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Joshua 19:44

Hebrew

וְאֶלְתְּקֵה וְגִבְּתוֹן וּבַעֲלָֽת׃

ve'eleteqeh-vegivetvon-vva'alat

KJV: And Eltekeh, and Gibbethon, and Baalath,

AKJV: And Eltekeh, and Gibbethon, and Baalath,

ASV: and Eltekeh, and Gibbethon, and Baalath,

YLT: and Eltekeh, and Gibbethon, and Baalath,

Exposition: Joshua 19:44 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Eltekeh, and Gibbethon, and Baalath,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Joshua 19:45

Hebrew

וִיהֻד וּבְנֵֽי־בְרַק וְגַת־רִמּֽוֹן׃

viyhud-vveney-veraq-vegat-rimvon

KJV: And Jehud, and Bene–berak, and Gath–rimmon,

AKJV: And Jehud, and Beneberak, and Gathrimmon,

ASV: and Jehud, and Bene-berak, and Gath-rimmon,

YLT: and Jehud, and Bene-Barak, and Gath-Rimmon,

Exposition: Joshua 19:45 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Jehud, and Bene–berak, and Gath–rimmon,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Joshua 19:46

Hebrew

וּמֵי הַיַּרְקוֹן וְהָֽרַקּוֹן עִֽם־הַגְּבוּל מוּל יָפֽוֹ׃

vmey-hayareqvon-veharaqvon-'im-hagevvl-mvl-yafvo

KJV: And Me–jarkon, and Rakkon, with the border before Japho.

AKJV: And Mejarkon, and Rakkon, with the border before Japho.

ASV: and Me-jarkon, and Rakkon, with the border over against Joppa.

YLT: and Me-Jarkon, and Rakkon, with the border over-against Japho.

Exposition: Joshua 19:46 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Me–jarkon, and Rakkon, with the border before Japho.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Joshua 19:47

Hebrew

וַיֵּצֵא גְבוּל־בְּנֵי־דָן מֵהֶם וַיַּעֲלוּ בְנֵֽי־דָן וַיִּלָּחֲמוּ עִם־לֶשֶׁם וַיִּלְכְּדוּ אוֹתָהּ ׀ וַיַּכּוּ אוֹתָהּ לְפִי־חֶרֶב וַיִּֽרְשׁוּ אוֹתָהּ וַיֵּשְׁבוּ בָהּ וַיִּקְרְאוּ לְלֶשֶׁם דָּן כְּשֵׁם דָּן אֲבִיהֶֽם׃

vayetze'-gevvl-veney-dan-mehem-vaya'alv-veney-dan-vayilachamv-'im-leshem-vayilekhedv-'votah- -vayakhv-'votah-lefiy-cherev-vayireshv-'votah-vayeshevv-vah-vayiqere'v-leleshem-dan-kheshem-dan-'aviyhem

KJV: And the coast of the children of Dan went out too little for them: therefore the children of Dan went up to fight against Leshem, and took it, and smote it with the edge of the sword, and possessed it, and dwelt therein, and called Leshem, Dan, after the name of Dan their father.

AKJV: And the coast of the children of Dan went out too little for them: therefore the children of Dan went up to fight against Leshem, and took it, and smote it with the edge of the sword, and possessed it, and dwelled therein, and called Leshem, Dan, after the name of Dan their father.

ASV: And the border of the children of Dan went out beyond them; for the children of Dan went up and fought against Leshem, and took it, and smote it with the edge of the sword, and possessed it, and dwelt therein, and called Leshem, Dan, after the name of Dan their father.

YLT: And the border of the sons of Dan goeth out from them, and the sons of Dan go up and fight with Leshem, and capture it, and smite it by the mouth of the sword, and possess it, and dwell in it, and call Leshem, Dan, according to the name of Dan their father.

Exposition: Joshua 19:47 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And the coast of the children of Dan went out too little for them: therefore the children of Dan went up to fight against Leshem, and took it, and smote it with the edge of the sword, and possessed it, and dwelt there...'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Joshua 19:48

Hebrew

זֹאת נַחֲלַת מַטֵּה בְנֵי־דָן לְמִשְׁפְּחֹתָם הֶֽעָרִים הָאֵלֶּה וְחַצְרֵיהֶֽן׃

zo't-nachalat-mateh-veney-dan-lemishefechotam-he'ariym-ha'eleh-vechatzereyhen

KJV: This is the inheritance of the tribe of the children of Dan according to their families, these cities with their villages.

AKJV: This is the inheritance of the tribe of the children of Dan according to their families, these cities with their villages. ¶

ASV: This is the inheritance of the tribe of the children of Dan according to their families, these cities with their villages.

YLT: This is the inheritance of the tribe of the sons of Dan, for their families, these cities and their villages.

Exposition: Joshua 19:48 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'This is the inheritance of the tribe of the children of Dan according to their families, these cities with their villages.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Joshua 19:49

Hebrew

וַיְכַלּוּ לִנְחֹל־אֶת־הָאָרֶץ לִגְבֽוּלֹתֶיהָ וַיִּתְּנוּ בְנֵי־יִשְׂרָאֵל נַחֲלָה לִיהוֹשֻׁעַ בִּן־נוּן בְּתוֹכָֽם׃

vayekhalv-linechol-'et-ha'aretz-ligevvloteyha-vayitenv-veney-yishera'el-nachalah-liyhvoshu'a-vin-nvn-vetvokham

KJV: When they had made an end of dividing the land for inheritance by their coasts, the children of Israel gave an inheritance to Joshua the son of Nun among them:

AKJV: When they had made an end of dividing the land for inheritance by their coasts, the children of Israel gave an inheritance to Joshua the son of Nun among them:

ASV: So they made an end of distributing the land for inheritance by the borders thereof; and the children of Israel gave an inheritance to Joshua the son of Nun in the midst of them:

YLT: And they finish to give the land in inheritance, by its borders, and the sons of Israel give an inheritance to Joshua son of Nun in their midst;

Exposition: Joshua 19:49 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'When they had made an end of dividing the land for inheritance by their coasts, the children of Israel gave an inheritance to Joshua the son of Nun among them:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Joshua 19:50

Hebrew

עַל־פִּי יְהוָה נָתְנוּ לוֹ אֶת־הָעִיר אֲשֶׁר שָׁאָל אֶת־תִּמְנַת־סֶרַח בְּהַר אֶפְרָיִם וַיִּבְנֶה אֶת־הָעִיר וַיֵּשֶׁב בָּֽהּ׃

'al-fiy-yehvah-natenv-lvo-'et-ha'iyr-'asher-sha'al-'et-timenat-serach-vehar-'eferayim-vayiveneh-'et-ha'iyr-vayeshev-vah

KJV: According to the word of the LORD they gave him the city which he asked, even Timnath–serah in mount Ephraim: and he built the city, and dwelt therein.

AKJV: According to the word of the LORD they gave him the city which he asked, even Timnathserah in mount Ephraim: and he built the city, and dwelled therein.

ASV: according to the commandment of Jehovah they gave him the city which he asked, even Timnath-serah in the hill-country of Ephraim; and he built the city, and dwelt therein.

YLT: by the command of Jehovah they have given to him the city which he asked, Timnath-Serah, in the hill-country of Ephraim, and he buildeth the city and dwelleth in it.

Exposition: Joshua 19:50 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'According to the word of the LORD they gave him the city which he asked, even Timnath–serah in mount Ephraim: and he built the city, and dwelt therein.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Joshua 19:51

Hebrew

אֵלֶּה הַנְּחָלֹת אֲשֶׁר נִחֲלוּ אֶלְעָזָר הַכֹּהֵן ׀ וִיהוֹשֻׁעַ בִּן־נוּן וְרָאשֵׁי הָֽאָבוֹת לְמַטּוֹת בְּנֵי־יִשְׂרָאֵל ׀ בְּגוֹרָל ׀ בְּשִׁלֹה לִפְנֵי יְהוָה פֶּתַח אֹהֶל מוֹעֵד וַיְכַלּוּ מֵֽחַלֵּק אֶת־הָאָֽרֶץ׃

'eleh-hanechalot-'asher-nichalv-'ele'azar-hakhohen- -viyhvoshu'a-vin-nvn-vera'shey-ha'avvot-lematvot-veney-yishera'el- -vegvoral- -veshiloh-lifeney-yehvah-fetach-'ohel-mvo'ed-vayekhalv-mechaleq-'et-ha'aretz

KJV: These are the inheritances, which Eleazar the priest, and Joshua the son of Nun, and the heads of the fathers of the tribes of the children of Israel, divided for an inheritance by lot in Shiloh before the LORD, at the door of the tabernacle of the congregation. So they made an end of dividing the country.

AKJV: These are the inheritances, which Eleazar the priest, and Joshua the son of Nun, and the heads of the fathers of the tribes of the children of Israel, divided for an inheritance by lot in Shiloh before the LORD, at the door of the tabernacle of the congregation. So they made an end of dividing the country.

ASV: These are the inheritances, which Eleazar the priest, and Joshua the son of Nun, and the heads of the fathers’housesof the tribes of the children of Israel, distributed for inheritance by lot in Shiloh before Jehovah, at the door of the tent of meeting. So they made an end of dividing the land.

YLT: These are the inheritances which Eleazar the priest, and Joshua son of Nun, and the heads of the fathers of the tribes of the sons of Israel, have caused to inherit by lot, in Shiloh, before Jehovah, at the opening of the tent of meeting; and they finish to apportion the land.

Exposition: Joshua 19:51 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'These are the inheritances, which Eleazar the priest, and Joshua the son of Nun, and the heads of the fathers of the tribes of the children of Israel, divided for an inheritance by lot in Shiloh before the LORD, at th...'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.