Apologetics Bible

Nehemiah 10:1

Hebrew

וּבְכָל־זֹאת אֲנַחְנוּ כֹּרְתִים אֲמָנָה וְכֹתְבִים וְעַל הֶֽחָתוּם שָׂרֵינוּ לְוִיֵּנוּ כֹּהֲנֵֽינוּ׃

vvekhal-zo't-'anachenv-khoretiym-'amanah-vekhoteviym-ve'al-hechatvm-shareynv-leviyenv-khohaneynv

KJV: Now those that sealed were, Nehemiah, the Tirshatha, the son of Hachaliah, and Zidkijah,

AKJV: Now those that sealed were, Nehemiah, the Tirshatha, the son of Hachaliah, and Zidkijah,

ASV: Now those that sealed were: Nehemiah the governor, the son of Hacaliah, and Zedekiah,

YLT: And over those sealed are Nehemiah the Tirshatha, son of Hachaliah, and Zidkijah,

Exposition: Nehemiah 10:1 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Now those that sealed were, Nehemiah, the Tirshatha, the son of Hachaliah, and Zidkijah,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Nehemiah 10:2

Hebrew

וְעַל הַחֲתוּמִים נְחֶמְיָה הַתִּרְשָׁתָא בֶּן־חֲכַלְיָה וְצִדְקִיָּֽה׃

ve'al-hachatvmiym-nechemeyah-hatireshata'-ven-chakhaleyah-vetzideqiyah

KJV: Seraiah, Azariah, Jeremiah,

AKJV: Seraiah, Azariah, Jeremiah,

ASV: Seraiah, Azariah, Jeremiah,

YLT: Seraiah, Azariah, Jeremiah,

Exposition: Nehemiah 10:2 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Seraiah, Azariah, Jeremiah,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Nehemiah 10:3

Hebrew

שְׂרָיָה עֲזַרְיָה יִרְמְיָֽה׃

sherayah-'azareyah-yiremeyah

KJV: Pashur, Amariah, Malchijah,

AKJV: Pashur, Amariah, Malchijah,

ASV: Pashhur, Amariah, Malchijah,

YLT: Pashhur, Amariah, Malchijah,

Exposition: Nehemiah 10:3 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Pashur, Amariah, Malchijah,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Nehemiah 10:4

Hebrew

פַּשְׁחוּר אֲמַרְיָה מַלְכִּיָּֽה׃

fashechvr-'amareyah-malekhiyah

KJV: Hattush, Shebaniah, Malluch,

AKJV: Hattush, Shebaniah, Malluch,

ASV: Hattush, Shebaniah, Malluch,

YLT: Huttush, Shebaniah, Malluch,

Exposition: Nehemiah 10:4 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Hattush, Shebaniah, Malluch,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Nehemiah 10:5

Hebrew

חַטּוּשׁ שְׁבַנְיָה מַלּֽוּךְ׃

chatvsh-shevaneyah-malvkhe

KJV: Harim, Meremoth, Obadiah,

AKJV: Harim, Meremoth, Obadiah,

ASV: Harim, Meremoth, Obadiah,

YLT: Harim, Meremoth, Obadiah,

Exposition: Nehemiah 10:5 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Harim, Meremoth, Obadiah,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Nehemiah 10:6

Hebrew

חָרִם מְרֵמוֹת עֹֽבַדְיָֽה׃

charim-meremvot-'ovadeyah

KJV: Daniel, Ginnethon, Baruch,

AKJV: Daniel, Ginnethon, Baruch,

ASV: Daniel, Ginnethon, Baruch,

YLT: Daniel, Ginnethon, Baruch,

Exposition: Nehemiah 10:6 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Daniel, Ginnethon, Baruch,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Nehemiah 10:7

Hebrew

דָּנִיֵּאל גִּנְּתוֹן בָּרֽוּךְ׃

daniye'l-ginetvon-varvkhe

KJV: Meshullam, Abijah, Mijamin,

AKJV: Meshullam, Abijah, Mijamin,

ASV: Meshullam, Abijah, Mijamin,

YLT: Meshullam, Abijah, Mijamin,

Exposition: Nehemiah 10:7 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Meshullam, Abijah, Mijamin,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Nehemiah 10:8

Hebrew

מְשֻׁלָּם אֲבִיָּה מִיָּמִֽן׃

meshulam-'aviyah-miyamin

KJV: Maaziah, Bilgai, Shemaiah: these were the priests.

AKJV: Maaziah, Bilgai, Shemaiah: these were the priests.

ASV: Maaziah, Bilgai, Shemaiah; these were the priests.

YLT: Maaziah, Bilgai, Shemaiah; these are the priests.

Exposition: Nehemiah 10:8 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Maaziah, Bilgai, Shemaiah: these were the priests.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Nehemiah 10:9

Hebrew

מַֽעַזְיָה בִלְגַּי שְׁמַֽעְיָה אֵלֶּה הַכֹּהֲנִֽים׃

ma'azeyah-vilegay-shema'eyah-'eleh-hakhohaniym

KJV: And the Levites: both Jeshua the son of Azaniah, Binnui of the sons of Henadad, Kadmiel;

AKJV: And the Levites: both Jeshua the son of Azaniah, Binnui of the sons of Henadad, Kadmiel;

ASV: And the Levites: namely, Jeshua the son of Azaniah, Binnui of the sons of Henadad, Kadmiel;

YLT: And the Levites: both Jeshua son of Azaniah, Binnui of the sons of Henadad, Kadmiel;

Exposition: Nehemiah 10:9 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And the Levites: both Jeshua the son of Azaniah, Binnui of the sons of Henadad, Kadmiel;'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Nehemiah 10:10

Hebrew

וְֽהַלְוִיִּם וְיֵשׁוּעַ בֶּן־אֲזַנְיָה בִּנּוּי מִבְּנֵי חֵנָדָד קַדְמִיאֵֽל׃

vehaleviyim-veyeshv'a-ven-'azaneyah-vinvy-miveney-chenadad-qademiy'el

KJV: And their brethren, Shebaniah, Hodijah, Kelita, Pelaiah, Hanan,

AKJV: And their brothers, Shebaniah, Hodijah, Kelita, Pelaiah, Hanan,

ASV: and their brethren, Shebaniah, Hodiah, Kelita, Pelaiah, Hanan,

YLT: and their brethren: Shebaniah, Hodijah, Kelita, Pelaiah, Hanan,

Exposition: Nehemiah 10:10 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And their brethren, Shebaniah, Hodijah, Kelita, Pelaiah, Hanan,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Nehemiah 10:11

Hebrew

וַאֲחֵיהֶם שְׁבַנְיָה הֽוֹדִיָּה קְלִיטָא פְּלָאיָה חָנָֽן׃

va'acheyhem-shevaneyah-hvodiyah-qeliyta'-fela'yah-chanan

KJV: Micha, Rehob, Hashabiah,

AKJV: Micha, Rehob, Hashabiah,

ASV: Mica, Rehob, Hashabiah,

YLT: Micha, Rehob, Hashabiah,

Exposition: Nehemiah 10:11 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Micha, Rehob, Hashabiah,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Nehemiah 10:12

Hebrew

מִיכָא רְחוֹב חֲשַׁבְיָֽה׃

miykha'-rechvov-chashaveyah

KJV: Zaccur, Sherebiah, Shebaniah,

AKJV: Zaccur, Sherebiah, Shebaniah,

ASV: Zaccur, Sherebiah, Shebaniah,

YLT: Zaccur, Sherebiah, Shebaniah,

Exposition: Nehemiah 10:12 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Zaccur, Sherebiah, Shebaniah,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Nehemiah 10:13

Hebrew

זַכּוּר שֵׁרֵֽבְיָה שְׁבַנְיָֽה׃

zakhvr-shereveyah-shevaneyah

KJV: Hodijah, Bani, Beninu.

AKJV: Hodijah, Bani, Beninu.

ASV: Hodiah, Bani, Beninu.

YLT: Hodijah, Bani, Beninu.

Exposition: Nehemiah 10:13 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Hodijah, Bani, Beninu.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Nehemiah 10:14

Hebrew

הוֹדִיָּה בָנִי בְּנִֽינוּ׃

hvodiyah-vaniy-veniynv

KJV: The chief of the people; Parosh, Pahath–moab, Elam, Zatthu, Bani,

AKJV: The chief of the people; Parosh, Pahathmoab, Elam, Zatthu, Bani,

ASV: The chiefs of the people: Parosh, Pahath-moab, Elam, Zattu, Bani,

YLT: Heads of the people: Parosh, Pahath-Moab, Elam, Zatthu, Bani,

Exposition: Nehemiah 10:14 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'The chief of the people; Parosh, Pahath–moab, Elam, Zatthu, Bani,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Nehemiah 10:15

Hebrew

רָאשֵׁי הָעָם פַּרְעֹשׁ פַּחַת מוֹאָב עֵילָם זַתּוּא בָּנִֽי׃

ra'shey-ha'am-fare'osh-fachat-mvo'av-'eylam-zatv'-vaniy

KJV: Bunni, Azgad, Bebai,

AKJV: Bunni, Azgad, Bebai,

ASV: Bunni, Azgad, Bebai,

YLT: Bunni, Azgad, Bebai,

Exposition: Nehemiah 10:15 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Bunni, Azgad, Bebai,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Nehemiah 10:16

Hebrew

בֻּנִּי עַזְגָּד בֵּבָֽי׃

vuniy-'azegad-vevay

KJV: Adonijah, Bigvai, Adin,

AKJV: Adonijah, Bigvai, Adin,

ASV: Adonijah, Bigvai, Adin,

YLT: Adonijah, Bigvai, Adin,

Exposition: Nehemiah 10:16 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Adonijah, Bigvai, Adin,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Nehemiah 10:17

Hebrew

אֲדֹנִיָּה בִגְוַי עָדִֽין׃

'adoniyah-vigevay-'adiyn

KJV: Ater, Hizkijah, Azzur,

AKJV: Ater, Hizkijah, Azzur,

ASV: Ater, Hezekiah, Azzur,

YLT: Ater, Hizkijah, Azzur,

Exposition: Nehemiah 10:17 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Ater, Hizkijah, Azzur,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Nehemiah 10:18

Hebrew

אָטֵר חִזְקִיָּה עַזּֽוּר׃

'ater-chizeqiyah-'azvr

KJV: Hodijah, Hashum, Bezai,

AKJV: Hodijah, Hashum, Bezai,

ASV: Hodiah, Hashum, Bezai,

YLT: Hodijah, Hashum, Bezai,

Exposition: Nehemiah 10:18 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Hodijah, Hashum, Bezai,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Nehemiah 10:19

Hebrew

הוֹדִיָּה חָשֻׁם בֵּצָֽי׃

hvodiyah-chashum-vetzay

KJV: Hariph, Anathoth, Nebai,

AKJV: Hariph, Anathoth, Nebai,

ASV: Hariph, Anathoth, Nobai,

YLT: Hariph, Anathoth, Nebai,

Exposition: Nehemiah 10:19 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Hariph, Anathoth, Nebai,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Nehemiah 10:20

Hebrew

חָרִיף עֲנָתוֹת נובי נֵיבָֽי׃

chariyf-'anatvot-nvvy-neyvay

KJV: Magpiash, Meshullam, Hezir,

AKJV: Magpiash, Meshullam, Hezir,

ASV: Magpiash, Meshullam, Hezir,

YLT: Magpiash, Meshullam, Hezir,

Exposition: Nehemiah 10:20 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Magpiash, Meshullam, Hezir,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Nehemiah 10:21

Hebrew

מַגְפִּיעָשׁ מְשֻׁלָּם חֵזִֽיר׃

magefiy'ash-meshulam-cheziyr

KJV: Meshezabeel, Zadok, Jaddua,

AKJV: Meshezabeel, Zadok, Jaddua,

ASV: Meshezabel, Zadok, Jaddua,

YLT: Meshezabeel, Zadok, Jaddua,

Exposition: Nehemiah 10:21 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Meshezabeel, Zadok, Jaddua,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Nehemiah 10:22

Hebrew

מְשֵׁיזַבְאֵל צָדוֹק יַדּֽוּעַ׃

mesheyzave'el-tzadvoq-yadv'a

KJV: Pelatiah, Hanan, Anaiah,

AKJV: Pelatiah, Hanan, Anaiah,

ASV: Pelatiah, Hanan, Anaiah,

YLT: Pelatiah, Hanan, Anaiah,

Exposition: Nehemiah 10:22 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Pelatiah, Hanan, Anaiah,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Nehemiah 10:23

Hebrew

פְּלַטְיָה חָנָן עֲנָיָֽה׃

felateyah-chanan-'anayah

KJV: Hoshea, Hananiah, Hashub,

AKJV: Hoshea, Hananiah, Hashub,

ASV: Hoshea, Hananiah, Hasshub,

YLT: Hoshea, Hananiah, Hashub,

Exposition: Nehemiah 10:23 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Hoshea, Hananiah, Hashub,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Nehemiah 10:24

Hebrew

הוֹשֵׁעַ חֲנַנְיָה חַשּֽׁוּב׃

hvoshe'a-chananeyah-chashvv

KJV: Hallohesh, Pileha, Shobek,

AKJV: Hallohesh, Pileha, Shobek,

ASV: Hallohesh, Pilha, Shobek,

YLT: Hallohesh, Pilha, Shobek,

Exposition: Nehemiah 10:24 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Hallohesh, Pileha, Shobek,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Nehemiah 10:25

Hebrew

הַלּוֹחֵשׁ פִּלְחָא שׁוֹבֵֽק׃

halvochesh-filecha'-shvoveq

KJV: Rehum, Hashabnah, Maaseiah,

AKJV: Rehum, Hashabnah, Maaseiah,

ASV: Rehum, Hashabnah, Maaseiah,

YLT: Rehum, Hashabnah, Maaseiah,

Exposition: Nehemiah 10:25 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Rehum, Hashabnah, Maaseiah,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Nehemiah 10:26

Hebrew

רְחוּם חֲשַׁבְנָה מַעֲשֵׂיָֽה׃

rechvm-chashavenah-ma'asheyah

KJV: And Ahijah, Hanan, Anan,

AKJV: And Ahijah, Hanan, Anan,

ASV: and Ahiah, Hanan, Anan,

YLT: and Ahijah, Hanan, Anan,

Exposition: Nehemiah 10:26 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Ahijah, Hanan, Anan,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Nehemiah 10:27

Hebrew

וַאֲחִיָּה חָנָן עָנָֽן׃

va'achiyah-chanan-'anan

KJV: Malluch, Harim, Baanah.

AKJV: Malluch, Harim, Baanah. ¶

ASV: Malluch, Harim, Baanah.

YLT: Malluch, Harim, Baanah.

Exposition: Nehemiah 10:27 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Malluch, Harim, Baanah.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Nehemiah 10:28

Hebrew

מַלּוּךְ חָרִם בַּעֲנָֽה׃

malvkhe-charim-va'anah

KJV: And the rest of the people, the priests, the Levites, the porters, the singers, the Nethinims, and all they that had separated themselves from the people of the lands unto the law of God, their wives, their sons, and their daughters, every one having knowledge, and having understanding;

AKJV: And the rest of the people, the priests, the Levites, the porters, the singers, the Nethinims, and all they that had separated themselves from the people of the lands to the law of God, their wives, their sons, and their daughters, every one having knowledge, and having understanding;

ASV: And the rest of the people, the priests, the Levites, the porters, the singers, the Nethinim, and all they that had separated themselves from the peoples of the lands unto the law of God, their wives, their sons, and their daughters, every one that had knowledge, and understanding;

YLT: And the rest of the people, the priests, the Levites, the gatekeepers, the singers, the Nethinim, and every one who hath been separated from the peoples of the lands unto the law of God, their wives, their sons, and their daughters, every knowing intelligent one,

Exposition: Nehemiah 10:28 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And the rest of the people, the priests, the Levites, the porters, the singers, the Nethinims, and all they that had separated themselves from the people of the lands unto the law of God, their wives, their sons, and...'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Nehemiah 10:29

Hebrew

וּשְׁאָר הָעָם הַכֹּהֲנִים הַלְוִיִּם הַשּׁוֹעֲרִים הַמְשֹׁרְרִים הַנְּתִינִים וְֽכָל־הַנִּבְדָּל מֵעַמֵּי הָאֲרָצוֹת אֶל־תּוֹרַת הָאֱלֹהִים נְשֵׁיהֶם בְּנֵיהֶם וּבְנֹתֵיהֶם כֹּל יוֹדֵעַ מֵבִֽין׃

vshe'ar-ha'am-hakhohaniym-haleviyim-hashvo'ariym-hameshoreriym-hanetiyniym-vekhal-hanivedal-me'amey-ha'aratzvot-'el-tvorat-ha'elohiym-nesheyhem-veneyhem-vvenoteyhem-khol-yvode'a-meviyn

KJV: They clave to their brethren, their nobles, and entered into a curse, and into an oath, to walk in God’s law, which was given by Moses the servant of God, and to observe and do all the commandments of the LORD our Lord, and his judgments and his statutes;

AKJV: They joined to their brothers, their nobles, and entered into a curse, and into an oath, to walk in God’s law, which was given by Moses the servant of God, and to observe and do all the commandments of the LORD our Lord, and his judgments and his statutes;

ASV: they clave to their brethren, their nobles, and entered into a curse, and into an oath, to walk in God’s law, which was given by Moses the servant of God, and to observe and do all the commandments of Jehovah our Lord, and his ordinances and his statutes;

YLT: are laying hold on their brethren, their honourable ones, and coming in to an execration, and in to an oath, to walk in the law of God, that was given by the hand of Moses, servant of God, and to observe and to do all the commands of Jehovah our Lord, and His judgments, and His statutes;

Exposition: Nehemiah 10:29 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'They clave to their brethren, their nobles, and entered into a curse, and into an oath, to walk in God’s law, which was given by Moses the servant of God, and to observe and do all the commandments of the LORD our Lor...'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Nehemiah 10:30

Hebrew

מַחֲזִיקִים עַל־אֲחֵיהֶם אַדִּירֵיהֶם וּבָאִים בְּאָלָה וּבִשְׁבוּעָה לָלֶכֶת בְּתוֹרַת הָאֱלֹהִים אֲשֶׁר נִתְּנָה בְּיַד מֹשֶׁה עֶֽבֶד־הֽ͏ָאֱלֹהִים וְלִשְׁמוֹר וְלַעֲשׂוֹת אֶת־כָּל־מִצְוֺת יְהוָה אֲדֹנֵינוּ וּמִשְׁפָּטָיו וְחֻקָּֽיו׃

machaziyqiym-'al-'acheyhem-'adiyreyhem-vva'iym-ve'alah-vvishevv'ah-lalekhet-vetvorat-ha'elohiym-'asher-nitenah-veyad-mosheh-'eved-ha'elohiym-velishemvor-vela'ashvot-'et-khal-mitzevt-yehvah-'adoneynv-vmishefatayv-vechuqayv

KJV: And that we would not give our daughters unto the people of the land, nor take their daughters for our sons:

AKJV: And that we would not give our daughters to the people of the land, not take their daughters for our sons:

ASV: and that we would not give our daughters unto the peoples of the land, nor take their daughters for our sons;

YLT: and that we give not our daughters to the peoples of the land, and their daughters we take not to our sons;

Exposition: Nehemiah 10:30 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And that we would not give our daughters unto the people of the land, nor take their daughters for our sons:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Nehemiah 10:31

Hebrew

וַאֲשֶׁר לֹא־נִתֵּן בְּנֹתֵינוּ לְעַמֵּי הָאָרֶץ וְאֶת־בְּנֹתֵיהֶם לֹא נִקַּח לְבָנֵֽינוּ׃

va'asher-lo'-niten-venoteynv-le'amey-ha'aretz-ve'et-venoteyhem-lo'-niqach-levaneynv

KJV: And if the people of the land bring ware or any victuals on the sabbath day to sell, that we would not buy it of them on the sabbath, or on the holy day: and that we would leave the seventh year, and the exaction of every debt.

AKJV: And if the people of the land bring ware or any victuals on the sabbath day to sell, that we would not buy it of them on the sabbath, or on the holy day: and that we would leave the seventh year, and the exaction of every debt.

ASV: and if the peoples of the land bring wares or any grain on the sabbath day to sell, that we would not buy of them on the sabbath, or on a holy day; and that we would forego the seventh year, and the exaction of every debt.

YLT: and the peoples of the land who are bringing in the wares and any corn on the sabbath-day to sell, we receive not of them on the sabbath, and on a holy day, and we leave the seventh year, and usury on every hand.

Exposition: Nehemiah 10:31 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And if the people of the land bring ware or any victuals on the sabbath day to sell, that we would not buy it of them on the sabbath, or on the holy day: and that we would leave the seventh year, and the exaction of e...'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Nehemiah 10:32

Hebrew

וְעַמֵּי הָאָרֶץ הַֽמְבִיאִים אֶת־הַמַּקָּחוֹת וְכָל־שֶׁבֶר בְּיוֹם הַשַּׁבָּת לִמְכּוֹר לֹא־נִקַּח מֵהֶם בַּשַּׁבָּת וּבְיוֹם קֹדֶשׁ וְנִטֹּשׁ אֶת־הַשָּׁנָה הַשְּׁבִיעִית וּמַשָּׁא כָל־יָֽד׃

ve'amey-ha'aretz-hameviy'iym-'et-hamaqachvot-vekhal-shever-veyvom-hashavat-limekhvor-lo'-niqach-mehem-vashavat-vveyvom-qodesh-venitosh-'et-hashanah-hasheviy'iyt-vmasha'-khal-yad

KJV: Also we made ordinances for us, to charge ourselves yearly with the third part of a shekel for the service of the house of our God;

AKJV: Also we made ordinances for us, to charge ourselves yearly with the third part of a shekel for the service of the house of our God;

ASV: Also we made ordinances for us, to charge ourselves yearly with the third part of a shekel for the service of the house of our God;

YLT: And we have appointed for ourselves commands, to put on ourselves the third of a shekel in a year, for the service of the house of our God,

Exposition: Nehemiah 10:32 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Also we made ordinances for us, to charge ourselves yearly with the third part of a shekel for the service of the house of our God;'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Nehemiah 10:33

Hebrew

וְהֶעֱמַדְנוּ עָלֵינוּ מִצְוֺת לָתֵת עָלֵינוּ שְׁלִשִׁית הַשֶּׁקֶל בַּשָּׁנָה לַעֲבֹדַת בֵּית אֱלֹהֵֽינוּ׃

vehe'emadenv-'aleynv-mitzevt-latet-'aleynv-shelishiyt-hasheqel-vashanah-la'avodat-veyt-'eloheynv

KJV: For the shewbread, and for the continual meat offering, and for the continual burnt offering, of the sabbaths, of the new moons, for the set feasts, and for the holy things, and for the sin offerings to make an atonement for Israel, and for all the work of the house of our God.

AKJV: For the show bread, and for the continual meat offering, and for the continual burnt offering, of the sabbaths, of the new moons, for the set feasts, and for the holy things, and for the sin offerings to make an atonement for Israel, and for all the work of the house of our God.

ASV: for the showbread, and for the continual meal-offering, and for the continual burnt-offering, for the sabbaths, for the new moons, for the set feasts, and for the holy things, and for the sin-offerings to make atonement for Israel, and for all the work of the house of our God.

YLT: for bread of the arrangement, and the continual present, and the continual burnt-offering of the sabbaths, of the new moons, for appointed seasons, and for holy things, and for sin-offerings, to make atonement for Israel, even all the work of the house of our God.

Exposition: Nehemiah 10:33 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'For the shewbread, and for the continual meat offering, and for the continual burnt offering, of the sabbaths, of the new moons, for the set feasts, and for the holy things, and for the sin offerings to make an atonem...'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Nehemiah 10:34

Hebrew

לְלֶחֶם הַֽמַּעֲרֶכֶת וּמִנְחַת הַתָּמִיד וּלְעוֹלַת הַתָּמִיד הַשַּׁבָּתוֹת הֶחֳדָשִׁים לַמּוֹעֲדִים וְלַקֳּדָשִׁים וְלַחַטָּאוֹת לְכַפֵּר עַל־יִשְׂרָאֵל וְכֹל מְלֶאכֶת בֵּית־אֱלֹהֵֽינוּ׃

lelechem-hama'arekhet-vminechat-hatamiyd-vle'volat-hatamiyd-hashavatvot-hechodashiym-lamvo'adiym-velaqodashiym-velachata'vot-lekhafer-'al-yishera'el-vekhol-mele'khet-veyt-'eloheynv

KJV: And we cast the lots among the priests, the Levites, and the people, for the wood offering, to bring it into the house of our God, after the houses of our fathers, at times appointed year by year, to burn upon the altar of the LORD our God, as it is written in the law:

AKJV: And we cast the lots among the priests, the Levites, and the people, for the wood offering, to bring it into the house of our God, after the houses of our fathers, at times appointed year by year, to burn on the altar of the LORD our God, as it is written in the law:

ASV: And we cast lots, the priests, the Levites, and the people, for the wood-offering, to bring it into the house of our God, according to our fathers’ houses, at times appointed, year by year, to burn upon the altar of Jehovah our God, as it is written in the law;

YLT: And the lots we have caused to fall for the offering of wood, among the priests, the Levites, and the people, to bring in to the house of our God, by the house of our fathers, at times appointed, year by year, to burn on the altar of Jehovah our God, as it is written in the law,

Exposition: Nehemiah 10:34 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And we cast the lots among the priests, the Levites, and the people, for the wood offering, to bring it into the house of our God, after the houses of our fathers, at times appointed year by year, to burn upon the alt...'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Nehemiah 10:35

Hebrew

וְהַגּוֹרָלוֹת הִפַּלְנוּ עַל־קֻרְבַּן הָעֵצִים הַכֹּהֲנִים הַלְוִיִּם וְהָעָם לְהָבִיא לְבֵית אֱלֹהֵינוּ לְבֵית־אֲבֹתֵינוּ לְעִתִּים מְזֻמָּנִים שָׁנָה בְשָׁנָה לְבַעֵר עַל־מִזְבַּח יְהוָה אֱלֹהֵינוּ כַּכָּתוּב בַּתּוֹרָֽה׃

vehagvoralvot-hifalenv-'al-qurevan-ha'etziym-hakhohaniym-haleviyim-veha'am-lehaviy'-leveyt-'eloheynv-leveyt-'avoteynv-le'itiym-mezumaniym-shanah-veshanah-leva'er-'al-mizevach-yehvah-'eloheynv-khakhatvv-vatvorah

KJV: And to bring the firstfruits of our ground, and the firstfruits of all fruit of all trees, year by year, unto the house of the LORD:

AKJV: And to bring the first fruits of our ground, and the first fruits of all fruit of all trees, year by year, to the house of the LORD:

ASV: and to bring the first-fruits of our ground, and the first-fruits of all fruit of all manner of trees, year by year, unto the house of Jehovah;

YLT: and to bring in the first fruits of our ground, and the first fruits of all fruit of every tree, year by year, to the house of Jehovah,

Exposition: Nehemiah 10:35 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And to bring the firstfruits of our ground, and the firstfruits of all fruit of all trees, year by year, unto the house of the LORD:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Nehemiah 10:36

Hebrew

וּלְהָבִיא אֶת־בִּכּוּרֵי אַדְמָתֵנוּ וּבִכּוּרֵי כָּל־פְּרִי כָל־עֵץ שָׁנָה בְשָׁנָה לְבֵית יְהוָֽה׃

vlehaviy'-'et-vikhvrey-'adematenv-vvikhvrey-khal-feriy-khal-'etz-shanah-veshanah-leveyt-yehvah

KJV: Also the firstborn of our sons, and of our cattle, as it is written in the law, and the firstlings of our herds and of our flocks, to bring to the house of our God, unto the priests that minister in the house of our God:

AKJV: Also the firstborn of our sons, and of our cattle, as it is written in the law, and the firstborn of our herds and of our flocks, to bring to the house of our God, to the priests that minister in the house of our God:

ASV: also the first-born of our sons, and of our cattle, as it is written in the law, and the firstlings of our herds and of our flocks, to bring to the house of our God, unto the priests that minister in the house of our God;

YLT: and the firstlings of our sons, and of our cattle, as it is written in the law, and the firstlings of our herds and our flocks, to bring in to the house of our God, to the priests who are ministering in the house of our God.

Exposition: Nehemiah 10:36 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Also the firstborn of our sons, and of our cattle, as it is written in the law, and the firstlings of our herds and of our flocks, to bring to the house of our God, unto the priests that minister in the house of our God:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Nehemiah 10:37

Hebrew

וְאֶת־בְּכֹרוֹת בָּנֵינוּ וּבְהֶמְתֵּינוּ כַּכָּתוּב בַּתּוֹרָה וְאֶת־בְּכוֹרֵי בְקָרֵינוּ וְצֹאנֵינוּ לְהָבִיא לְבֵית אֱלֹהֵינוּ לַכֹּהֲנִים הַמְשָׁרְתִים בְּבֵית אֱלֹהֵֽינוּ׃

ve'et-vekhorvot-vaneynv-vvehemeteynv-khakhatvv-vatvorah-ve'et-vekhvorey-veqareynv-vetzo'neynv-lehaviy'-leveyt-'eloheynv-lakhohaniym-hamesharetiym-veveyt-'eloheynv

KJV: And that we should bring the firstfruits of our dough, and our offerings, and the fruit of all manner of trees, of wine and of oil, unto the priests, to the chambers of the house of our God; and the tithes of our ground unto the Levites, that the same Levites might have the tithes in all the cities of our tillage.

AKJV: And that we should bring the first fruits of our dough, and our offerings, and the fruit of all manner of trees, of wine and of oil, to the priests, to the chambers of the house of our God; and the tithes of our ground to the Levites, that the same Levites might have the tithes in all the cities of our tillage.

ASV: and that we should bring the first-fruits of our dough, and our heave-offerings, and the fruit of all manner of trees, the new wine and the oil, unto the priests, to the chambers of the house of our God; and the tithes of our ground unto the Levites; for they, the Levites, take the tithes in all the cities of our tillage.

YLT: And the beginning of our dough, and our heave-offerings, and the fruit of every tree, of new wine, and of oil, we bring in to the priests, unto the chambers of the house of our God, and the tithe of our ground to the Levites; and they--the Levites--have the tithes in all the cities of our tillage;

Exposition: Nehemiah 10:37 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And that we should bring the firstfruits of our dough, and our offerings, and the fruit of all manner of trees, of wine and of oil, unto the priests, to the chambers of the house of our God; and the tithes of our grou...'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Nehemiah 10:38

Hebrew

וְאֶת־רֵאשִׁית עֲרִיסֹתֵינוּ וּתְרוּמֹתֵינוּ וּפְרִי כָל־עֵץ תִּירוֹשׁ וְיִצְהָר נָבִיא לַכֹּהֲנִים אֶל־לִשְׁכוֹת בֵּית־אֱלֹהֵינוּ וּמַעְשַׂר אַדְמָתֵנוּ לַלְוִיִּם וְהֵם הַלְוִיִּם הַֽמְעַשְּׂרִים בְּכֹל עָרֵי עֲבֹדָתֵֽנוּ׃

ve'et-re'shiyt-'ariysoteynv-vtervmoteynv-vferiy-khal-'etz-tiyrvosh-veyitzehar-naviy'-lakhohaniym-'el-lishekhvot-veyt-'eloheynv-vma'eshar-'adematenv-laleviyim-vehem-haleviyim-hame'asheriym-vekhol-'arey-'avodatenv

KJV: And the priest the son of Aaron shall be with the Levites, when the Levites take tithes: and the Levites shall bring up the tithe of the tithes unto the house of our God, to the chambers, into the treasure house.

AKJV: And the priest the son of Aaron shall be with the Levites, when the Levites take tithes: and the Levites shall bring up the tithe of the tithes to the house of our God, to the chambers, into the treasure house.

ASV: And the priest the son of Aaron shall be with the Levites, when the Levites take tithes: and the Levites shall bring up the tithe of the tithes unto the house of our God, to the chambers, into the treasure-house.

YLT: and the priest, son of Aaron, hath been with the Levites in the tithing of the Levites, and the Levites bring up the tithe of the tithe to the house of our God unto the chambers, to the treasure-house;

Exposition: Nehemiah 10:38 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And the priest the son of Aaron shall be with the Levites, when the Levites take tithes: and the Levites shall bring up the tithe of the tithes unto the house of our God, to the chambers, into the treasure house.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Nehemiah 10:39

Hebrew

וְהָיָה הַכֹּהֵן בֶּֽן־אַהֲרֹן עִם־הַלְוִיִּם בַּעְשֵׂר הַלְוִיִּם וְהַלְוִיִּם יַעֲלוּ אֶת־מַעֲשַׂר הַֽמַּעֲשֵׂר לְבֵית אֱלֹהֵינוּ אֶל־הַלְּשָׁכוֹת לְבֵית הָאוֹצָֽר׃

vehayah-hakhohen-ven-'aharon-'im-haleviyim-va'esher-haleviyim-vehaleviyim-ya'alv-'et-ma'ashar-hama'asher-leveyt-'eloheynv-'el-haleshakhvot-leveyt-ha'votzar

KJV: For the children of Israel and the children of Levi shall bring the offering of the corn, of the new wine, and the oil, unto the chambers, where are the vessels of the sanctuary, and the priests that minister, and the porters, and the singers: and we will not forsake the house of our God.

AKJV: For the children of Israel and the children of Levi shall bring the offering of the corn, of the new wine, and the oil, to the chambers, where are the vessels of the sanctuary, and the priests that minister, and the porters, and the singers: and we will not forsake the house of our God.

ASV: For the children of Israel and the children of Levi shall bring the heave-offering of the grain, of the new wine, and of the oil, unto the chambers, where are the vessels of the sanctuary, and the priests that minister, and the porters, and the singers: and we will not forsake the house of our God.

YLT: for unto the chambers do they bring in--the sons of Israel and the sons of Levi--the heave-offering of the corn, the new wine, and the oil, and there are vessels of the sanctuary, and the priests, those ministering, and the gatekeepers, and the singers, and we do not forsake the house of our God.

Exposition: Nehemiah 10:39 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'For the children of Israel and the children of Levi shall bring the offering of the corn, of the new wine, and the oil, unto the chambers, where are the vessels of the sanctuary, and the priests that minister, and the...'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.