Apologetics Bible

Numbers 13:1

Hebrew

וַיְדַבֵּר יְהוָה אֶל־מֹשֶׁה לֵּאמֹֽר׃

vayedaver-yehvah-'el-mosheh-le'mor

KJV: And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying,

AKJV: And the LORD spoke to Moses, saying,

ASV: And Jehovah spake unto Moses, saying,

YLT: And Jehovah speaketh unto Moses, saying,

Exposition: Numbers 13:1 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 13:2

Hebrew

שְׁלַח־לְךָ אֲנָשִׁים וְיָתֻרוּ אֶת־אֶרֶץ כְּנַעַן אֲשֶׁר־אֲנִי נֹתֵן לִבְנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל אִישׁ אֶחָד אִישׁ אֶחָד לְמַטֵּה אֲבֹתָיו תִּשְׁלָחוּ כֹּל נָשִׂיא בָהֶֽם׃

shelach-lekha-'anashiym-veyaturv-'et-'eretz-khena'an-'asher-'aniy-noten-liveney-yishera'el-'iysh-'echad-'iysh-'echad-lemateh-'avotayv-tishelachv-khol-nashiy'-vahem

KJV: Send thou men, that they may search the land of Canaan, which I give unto the children of Israel: of every tribe of their fathers shall ye send a man, every one a ruler among them.

AKJV: Send you men, that they may search the land of Canaan, which I give to the children of Israel: of every tribe of their fathers shall you send a man, every one a ruler among them.

ASV: Send thou men, that they may spy out the land of Canaan, which I give unto the children of Israel: of every tribe of their fathers shall ye send a man, every one a prince among them.

YLT: `Send for thee men, and they spy the land of Canaan, which I am giving to the sons of Israel; one man, one man for the tribe of his fathers ye do send, every one a prince among them.'

Exposition: Numbers 13:2 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Send thou men, that they may search the land of Canaan, which I give unto the children of Israel: of every tribe of their fathers shall ye send a man, every one a ruler among them.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 13:3

Hebrew

וַיִּשְׁלַח אֹתָם מֹשֶׁה מִמִּדְבַּר פָּארָן עַל־פִּי יְהוָה כֻּלָּם אֲנָשִׁים רָאשֵׁי בְנֵֽי־יִשְׂרָאֵל הֵֽמָּה׃

vayishelach-'otam-mosheh-mimidevar-fa'ran-'al-fiy-yehvah-khulam-'anashiym-ra'shey-veney-yishera'el-hemah

KJV: And Moses by the commandment of the LORD sent them from the wilderness of Paran: all those men were heads of the children of Israel.

AKJV: And Moses by the commandment of the LORD sent them from the wilderness of Paran: all those men were heads of the children of Israel.

ASV: And Moses sent them from the wilderness of Paran according to the commandment of Jehovah: all of them men who were heads of the children of Israel.

YLT: And Moses sendeth them from the wilderness of Paran by the command of Jehovah; all of them are men, heads of the sons of Israel they are,

Exposition: Numbers 13:3 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Moses by the commandment of the LORD sent them from the wilderness of Paran: all those men were heads of the children of Israel.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 13:4

Hebrew

וְאֵלֶּה שְׁמוֹתָם לְמַטֵּה רְאוּבֵן שַׁמּוּעַ בֶּן־זַכּֽוּר׃

ve'eleh-shemvotam-lemateh-re'vven-shamv'a-ven-zakhvr

KJV: And these were their names: of the tribe of Reuben, Shammua the son of Zaccur.

AKJV: And these were their names: of the tribe of Reuben, Shammua the son of Zaccur.

ASV: And these were their names: Of the tribe of Reuben, Shammua the son of Zaccur.

YLT: and these their names: For the tribe of Reuben, Shammua son of Zaccur.

Exposition: Numbers 13:4 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And these were their names: of the tribe of Reuben, Shammua the son of Zaccur.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 13:5

Hebrew

לְמַטֵּה שִׁמְעוֹן שָׁפָט בֶּן־חוֹרִֽי׃

lemateh-shime'von-shafat-ven-chvoriy

KJV: Of the tribe of Simeon, Shaphat the son of Hori.

AKJV: Of the tribe of Simeon, Shaphat the son of Hori.

ASV: Of the tribe of Simeon, Shaphat the son of Hori.

YLT: For the tribe of Simeon, Shaphat son of Hori.

Exposition: Numbers 13:5 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Of the tribe of Simeon, Shaphat the son of Hori.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 13:6

Hebrew

לְמַטֵּה יְהוּדָה כָּלֵב בֶּן־יְפֻנֶּֽה׃

lemateh-yehvdah-khalev-ven-yefuneh

KJV: Of the tribe of Judah, Caleb the son of Jephunneh.

AKJV: Of the tribe of Judah, Caleb the son of Jephunneh.

ASV: Of the tribe of Judah, Caleb the son of Jephunneh.

YLT: For the tribe of Judah, Caleb son of Jephunneh.

Exposition: Numbers 13:6 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Of the tribe of Judah, Caleb the son of Jephunneh.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 13:7

Hebrew

לְמַטֵּה יִשָּׂשכָר יִגְאָל בֶּן־יוֹסֵֽף׃

lemateh-yishashkhar-yige'al-ven-yvosef

KJV: Of the tribe of Issachar, Igal the son of Joseph.

AKJV: Of the tribe of Issachar, Igal the son of Joseph.

ASV: Of the tribe of Issachar, Igal the son of Joseph.

YLT: For the tribe of Issachar, Igal son of Joseph.

Exposition: Numbers 13:7 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Of the tribe of Issachar, Igal the son of Joseph.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 13:8

Hebrew

לְמַטֵּה אֶפְרָיִם הוֹשֵׁעַ בִּן־נֽוּן׃

lemateh-'eferayim-hvoshe'a-vin-nvn

KJV: Of the tribe of Ephraim, Oshea the son of Nun.

AKJV: Of the tribe of Ephraim, Oshea the son of Nun.

ASV: Of the tribe of Ephraim, Hoshea the son of Nun.

YLT: For the tribe of Ephraim, Oshea, son of Nun.

Exposition: Numbers 13:8 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Of the tribe of Ephraim, Oshea the son of Nun.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 13:9

Hebrew

לְמַטֵּה בִנְיָמִן פַּלְטִי בֶּן־רָפֽוּא׃

lemateh-vineyamin-faletiy-ven-rafv'

KJV: Of the tribe of Benjamin, Palti the son of Raphu.

AKJV: Of the tribe of Benjamin, Palti the son of Raphu.

ASV: Of the tribe of Benjamin, Palti the son of Raphu.

YLT: For the tribe of Benjamin, Palti son of Raphu.

Exposition: Numbers 13:9 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Of the tribe of Benjamin, Palti the son of Raphu.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 13:10

Hebrew

לְמַטֵּה זְבוּלֻן גַּדִּיאֵל בֶּן־סוֹדִֽי׃

lemateh-zevvlun-gadiy'el-ven-svodiy

KJV: Of the tribe of Zebulun, Gaddiel the son of Sodi.

AKJV: Of the tribe of Zebulun, Gaddiel the son of Sodi.

ASV: Of the tribe of Zebulun, Gaddiel the son of Sodi.

YLT: For the tribe of Zebulun, Gaddiel son of Sodi.

Exposition: Numbers 13:10 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Of the tribe of Zebulun, Gaddiel the son of Sodi.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 13:11

Hebrew

לְמַטֵּה יוֹסֵף לְמַטֵּה מְנַשֶּׁה גַּדִּי בֶּן־סוּסִֽי׃

lemateh-yvosef-lemateh-menasheh-gadiy-ven-svsiy

KJV: Of the tribe of Joseph, namely, of the tribe of Manasseh, Gaddi the son of Susi.

AKJV: Of the tribe of Joseph, namely, of the tribe of Manasseh, Gaddi the son of Susi.

ASV: Of the tribe of Joseph, namely, of the tribe of Manasseh, Gaddi the son of Susi.

YLT: For the tribe of Joseph, (for the tribe of Manasseh,) Gaddi son of Susi.

Exposition: Numbers 13:11 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Of the tribe of Joseph, namely, of the tribe of Manasseh, Gaddi the son of Susi.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 13:12

Hebrew

לְמַטֵּה דָן עַמִּיאֵל בֶּן־גְּמַלִּֽי׃

lemateh-dan-'amiy'el-ven-gemaliy

KJV: Of the tribe of Dan, Ammiel the son of Gemalli.

AKJV: Of the tribe of Dan, Ammiel the son of Gemalli.

ASV: Of the tribe of Dan, Ammiel the son of Gemalli.

YLT: For the tribe of Dan, Ammiel son of Gemalli.

Exposition: Numbers 13:12 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Of the tribe of Dan, Ammiel the son of Gemalli.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 13:13

Hebrew

לְמַטֵּה אָשֵׁר סְתוּר בֶּן־מִיכָאֵֽל׃

lemateh-'asher-setvr-ven-miykha'el

KJV: Of the tribe of Asher, Sethur the son of Michael.

AKJV: Of the tribe of Asher, Sethur the son of Michael.

ASV: Of the tribe of Asher, Sethur the son of Michael.

YLT: For the tribe of Asher, Sethur son of Michael.

Exposition: Numbers 13:13 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Of the tribe of Asher, Sethur the son of Michael.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 13:14

Hebrew

לְמַטֵּה נַפְתָּלִי נַחְבִּי בֶּן־וָפְסִֽי׃

lemateh-nafetaliy-nacheviy-ven-vafesiy

KJV: Of the tribe of Naphtali, Nahbi the son of Vophsi.

AKJV: Of the tribe of Naphtali, Nahbi the son of Vophsi.

ASV: Of the tribe of Naphtali, Nahbi the son of Vophsi.

YLT: For the tribe of Naphtali, Nahbi son of Vopshi.

Exposition: Numbers 13:14 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Of the tribe of Naphtali, Nahbi the son of Vophsi.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 13:15

Hebrew

לְמַטֵּה גָד גְּאוּאֵל בֶּן־מָכִֽי׃

lemateh-gad-ge'v'el-ven-makhiy

KJV: Of the tribe of Gad, Geuel the son of Machi.

AKJV: Of the tribe of Gad, Geuel the son of Machi.

ASV: Of the tribe of Gad, Geuel the son of Machi.

YLT: For the tribe of Gad, Geuel son of Machi.

Exposition: Numbers 13:15 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Of the tribe of Gad, Geuel the son of Machi.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 13:16

Hebrew

אֵלֶּה שְׁמוֹת הָֽאֲנָשִׁים אֲשֶׁר־שָׁלַח מֹשֶׁה לָתוּר אֶת־הָאָרֶץ וַיִּקְרָא מֹשֶׁה לְהוֹשֵׁעַ בִּן־נוּן יְהוֹשֻֽׁעַ׃

'eleh-shemvot-ha'anashiym-'asher-shalach-mosheh-latvr-'et-ha'aretz-vayiqera'-mosheh-lehvoshe'a-vin-nvn-yehvoshu'a

KJV: These are the names of the men which Moses sent to spy out the land. And Moses called Oshea the son of Nun Jehoshua.

AKJV: These are the names of the men which Moses sent to spy out the land. And Moses called Oshea the son of Nun Jehoshua. ¶

ASV: These are the names of the men that Moses sent to spy out the land. And Moses called Hoshea the son of Nun Joshua.

YLT: These are the names of the men whom Moses hath sent to spy the land; and Moses calleth Hoshea son of Nun, Jehoshua.

Exposition: Numbers 13:16 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'These are the names of the men which Moses sent to spy out the land. And Moses called Oshea the son of Nun Jehoshua.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 13:17

Hebrew

וַיִּשְׁלַח אֹתָם מֹשֶׁה לָתוּר אֶת־אֶרֶץ כְּנָעַן וַיֹּאמֶר אֲלֵהֶם עֲלוּ זֶה בַּנֶּגֶב וַעֲלִיתֶם אֶת־הָהָֽר׃

vayishelach-'otam-mosheh-latvr-'et-'eretz-khena'an-vayo'mer-'alehem-'alv-zeh-vanegev-va'aliytem-'et-hahar

KJV: And Moses sent them to spy out the land of Canaan, and said unto them, Get you up this way southward, and go up into the mountain:

AKJV: And Moses sent them to spy out the land of Canaan, and said to them, Get you up this way southward, and go up into the mountain:

ASV: And Moses sent them to spy out the land of Canaan, and said unto them, Get you up this way by the South, and go up into the hill-country:

YLT: And Moses sendeth them to spy the land of Canaan, and saith unto them, `Go ye up this way into the south, and ye have gone up the mountain,

Exposition: Numbers 13:17 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Moses sent them to spy out the land of Canaan, and said unto them, Get you up this way southward, and go up into the mountain:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 13:18

Hebrew

וּרְאִיתֶם אֶת־הָאָרֶץ מַה־הִוא וְאֶת־הָעָם הַיֹּשֵׁב עָלֶיהָ הֶחָזָק הוּא הֲרָפֶה הַמְעַט הוּא אִם־רָֽב׃

vre'iytem-'et-ha'aretz-mah-hiv'-ve'et-ha'am-hayoshev-'aleyha-hechazaq-hv'-harafeh-hame'at-hv'-'im-rav

KJV: And see the land, what it is; and the people that dwelleth therein, whether they be strong or weak, few or many;

AKJV: And see the land, what it is, and the people that dwells therein, whether they be strong or weak, few or many;

ASV: and see the land, what it is; and the people that dwell therein, whether they are strong or weak, whether they are few or many;

YLT: and have seen the land what it is , and the people which is dwelling on it, whether it is strong or feeble; whether it is few or many;

Exposition: Numbers 13:18 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And see the land, what it is; and the people that dwelleth therein, whether they be strong or weak, few or many;'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 13:19

Hebrew

וּמָה הָאָרֶץ אֲשֶׁר־הוּא יֹשֵׁב בָּהּ הֲטוֹבָה הִוא אִם־רָעָה וּמָה הֶֽעָרִים אֲשֶׁר־הוּא יוֹשֵׁב בָּהֵנָּה הַבְּמַֽחֲנִים אִם בְּמִבְצָרִֽים׃

vmah-ha'aretz-'asher-hv'-yoshev-vah-hatvovah-hiv'-'im-ra'ah-vmah-he'ariym-'asher-hv'-yvoshev-vahenah-havemachaniym-'im-vemivetzariym

KJV: And what the land is that they dwell in, whether it be good or bad; and what cities they be that they dwell in, whether in tents, or in strong holds;

AKJV: And what the land is that they dwell in, whether it be good or bad; and what cities they be that they dwell in, whether in tents, or in strong holds;

ASV: and what the land is that they dwell in, whether it is good or bad; and what cities they are that they dwell in, whether in camps, or in strongholds;

YLT: and what the land is in which it is dwelling, whether it is good or bad; and what are the cities in which it is dwelling, whether in camps or in fortresses;

Exposition: Numbers 13:19 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And what the land is that they dwell in, whether it be good or bad; and what cities they be that they dwell in, whether in tents, or in strong holds;'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 13:20

Hebrew

וּמָה הָאָרֶץ הַשְּׁמֵנָה הִוא אִם־רָזָה הֲיֵֽשׁ־בָּהּ עֵץ אִם־אַיִן וְהִתְחַזַּקְתֶּם וּלְקַחְתֶּם מִפְּרִי הָאָרֶץ וְהַיָּמִים יְמֵי בִּכּוּרֵי עֲנָבִֽים׃

vmah-ha'aretz-hashemenah-hiv'-'im-razah-hayesh-vah-'etz-'im-'ayin-vehitechazaqetem-vleqachetem-miferiy-ha'aretz-vehayamiym-yemey-vikhvrey-'anaviym

KJV: And what the land is, whether it be fat or lean, whether there be wood therein, or not. And be ye of good courage, and bring of the fruit of the land. Now the time was the time of the firstripe grapes.

AKJV: And what the land is, whether it be fat or lean, whether there be wood therein, or not. And be you of good courage, and bring of the fruit of the land. Now the time was the time of the first ripe grapes. ¶

ASV: and what the land is, whether it is fat or lean, whether there is wood therein, or not. And be ye of good courage, and bring of the fruit of the land. Now the time was the time of the first-ripe grapes.

YLT: And what the land is , whether it is fat or lean; whether there is wood in it or not; and ye have strengthened yourselves, and have taken of the fruit of the land;' and the days are days of the first-fruits of grapes.

Exposition: Numbers 13:20 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And what the land is, whether it be fat or lean, whether there be wood therein, or not. And be ye of good courage, and bring of the fruit of the land. Now the time was the time of the firstripe grapes.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 13:21

Hebrew

וַֽיַּעֲלוּ וַיָּתֻרוּ אֶת־הָאָרֶץ מִמִּדְבַּר־צִן עַד־רְחֹב לְבֹא חֲמָֽת׃

vaya'alv-vayaturv-'et-ha'aretz-mimidevar-tzin-'ad-rechov-levo'-chamat

KJV: So they went up, and searched the land from the wilderness of Zin unto Rehob, as men come to Hamath.

AKJV: So they went up, and searched the land from the wilderness of Zin to Rehob, as men come to Hamath.

ASV: So they went up, and spied out the land from the wilderness of Zin unto Rehob, to the entrance of Hamath.

YLT: And they go up and spy the land, from the wilderness of Zin unto Rehob at the going in to Hamath;

Exposition: Numbers 13:21 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'So they went up, and searched the land from the wilderness of Zin unto Rehob, as men come to Hamath.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 13:22

Hebrew

וַיַּעֲלוּ בַנֶּגֶב וַיָּבֹא עַד־חֶבְרוֹן וְשָׁם אֲחִימַן שֵׁשַׁי וְתַלְמַי יְלִידֵי הָעֲנָק וְחֶבְרוֹן שֶׁבַע שָׁנִים נִבְנְתָה לִפְנֵי צֹעַן מִצְרָֽיִם׃

vaya'alv-vanegev-vayavo'-'ad-chevervon-vesham-'achiyman-sheshay-vetalemay-yeliydey-ha'anaq-vechevervon-sheva'-shaniym-nivenetah-lifeney-tzo'an-mitzerayim

KJV: And they ascended by the south, and came unto Hebron; where Ahiman, Sheshai, and Talmai, the children of Anak, were. (Now Hebron was built seven years before Zoan in Egypt.)

AKJV: And they ascended by the south, and came to Hebron; where Ahiman, Sheshai, and Talmai, the children of Anak, were. (Now Hebron was built seven years before Zoan in Egypt.)

ASV: And they went up by the South, and came unto Hebron; and Ahiman, Sheshai, and Talmai, the children of Anak, were there. (Now Hebron was built seven years before Zoan in Egypt.)

YLT: and they go up by the south, and come in unto Hebron, and there are Ahiman, Sheshai, and Talmai, children of Anak (and Hebron was built seven years before Zoan in Egypt),

Exposition: Numbers 13:22 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And they ascended by the south, and came unto Hebron; where Ahiman, Sheshai, and Talmai, the children of Anak, were. (Now Hebron was built seven years before Zoan in Egypt.)'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 13:23

Hebrew

וַיָּבֹאוּ עַד־נַחַל אֶשְׁכֹּל וַיִּכְרְתוּ מִשָּׁם זְמוֹרָה וְאֶשְׁכּוֹל עֲנָבִים אֶחָד וַיִּשָּׂאֻהוּ בַמּוֹט בִּשְׁנָיִם וּמִן־הָרִמֹּנִים וּמִן־הַתְּאֵנִֽים׃

vayavo'v-'ad-nachal-'eshekhol-vayikheretv-misham-zemvorah-ve'eshekhvol-'anaviym-'echad-vayisha'uhv-vamvot-vishenayim-vmin-harimoniym-vmin-hate'eniym

KJV: And they came unto the brook of Eshcol, and cut down from thence a branch with one cluster of grapes, and they bare it between two upon a staff; and they brought of the pomegranates, and of the figs.

AKJV: And they came to the brook of Eshcol, and cut down from there a branch with one cluster of grapes, and they bore it between two on a staff; and they brought of the pomegranates, and of the figs.

ASV: And they came unto the valley of Eshcol, and cut down from thence a branch with one cluster of grapes, and they bare it upon a staff between two; they brought also of the pomegranates, and of the figs.

YLT: and they come in unto the brook of Eshcol, and cut down thence a branch and one cluster of grapes, and they bear it on a staff by two, also some of the pomegranates, and of the figs.

Exposition: Numbers 13:23 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And they came unto the brook of Eshcol, and cut down from thence a branch with one cluster of grapes, and they bare it between two upon a staff; and they brought of the pomegranates, and of the figs.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 13:24

Hebrew

לַמָּקוֹם הַהוּא קָרָא נַחַל אֶשְׁכּוֹל עַל אֹדוֹת הָֽאֶשְׁכּוֹל אֲשֶׁר־כָּרְתוּ מִשָּׁם בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵֽל׃

lamaqvom-hahv'-qara'-nachal-'eshekhvol-'al-'odvot-ha'eshekhvol-'asher-kharetv-misham-veney-yishera'el

KJV: The place was called the brook Eshcol, because of the cluster of grapes which the children of Israel cut down from thence.

AKJV: The place was called the brook Eshcol, because of the cluster of grapes which the children of Israel cut down from there.

ASV: That place was called the valley of Eshcol, because of the cluster which the children of Israel cut down from thence.

YLT: That place hath one called Brook of Eshcol, because of the cluster which the sons of Israel cut from thence.

Exposition: Numbers 13:24 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'The place was called the brook Eshcol, because of the cluster of grapes which the children of Israel cut down from thence.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 13:25

Hebrew

וַיָּשֻׁבוּ מִתּוּר הָאָרֶץ מִקֵּץ אַרְבָּעִים יֽוֹם׃

vayashuvv-mitvr-ha'aretz-miqetz-'areva'iym-yvom

KJV: And they returned from searching of the land after forty days.

AKJV: And they returned from searching of the land after forty days. ¶

ASV: And they returned from spying out the land at the end of forty days.

YLT: And they turn back from spying the land at the end of forty days.

Exposition: Numbers 13:25 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And they returned from searching of the land after forty days.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 13:26

Hebrew

וַיֵּלְכוּ וַיָּבֹאוּ אֶל־מֹשֶׁה וְאֶֽל־אַהֲרֹן וְאֶל־כָּל־עֲדַת בְּנֵֽי־יִשְׂרָאֵל אֶל־מִדְבַּר פָּארָן קָדֵשָׁה וַיָּשִׁיבוּ אוֹתָם דָּבָר וְאֶת־כָּל־הָעֵדָה וַיַּרְאוּם אֶת־פְּרִי הָאָֽרֶץ׃

vayelekhv-vayavo'v-'el-mosheh-ve'el-'aharon-ve'el-khal-'adat-veney-yishera'el-'el-midevar-fa'ran-qadeshah-vayashiyvv-'votam-davar-ve'et-khal-ha'edah-vayare'vm-'et-feriy-ha'aretz

KJV: And they went and came to Moses, and to Aaron, and to all the congregation of the children of Israel, unto the wilderness of Paran, to Kadesh; and brought back word unto them, and unto all the congregation, and shewed them the fruit of the land.

AKJV: And they went and came to Moses, and to Aaron, and to all the congregation of the children of Israel, to the wilderness of Paran, to Kadesh; and brought back word to them, and to all the congregation, and showed them the fruit of the land.

ASV: And they went and came to Moses, and to Aaron, and to all the congregation of the children of Israel, unto the wilderness of Paran, to Kadesh; and brought back word unto them, and unto all the congregation, and showed them the fruit of the land.

YLT: And they go and come in unto Moses, and unto Aaron, and unto all the company of the sons of Israel, unto the wilderness of Paran, to Kadesh; and they bring them and all the company back word, and shew them the fruit of the land.

Exposition: Numbers 13:26 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And they went and came to Moses, and to Aaron, and to all the congregation of the children of Israel, unto the wilderness of Paran, to Kadesh; and brought back word unto them, and unto all the congregation, and shewed...'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 13:27

Hebrew

וַיְסַפְּרוּ־לוֹ וַיֹּאמְרוּ בָּאנוּ אֶל־הָאָרֶץ אֲשֶׁר שְׁלַחְתָּנוּ וְגַם זָבַת חָלָב וּדְבַשׁ הִוא וְזֶה־פִּרְיָֽהּ׃

vayesaferv-lvo-vayo'merv-va'nv-'el-ha'aretz-'asher-shelachetanv-vegam-zavat-chalav-vdevash-hiv'-vezeh-fireyah

KJV: And they told him, and said, We came unto the land whither thou sentest us, and surely it floweth with milk and honey; and this is the fruit of it.

AKJV: And they told him, and said, We came to the land where you sent us, and surely it flows with milk and honey; and this is the fruit of it.

ASV: And they told him, and said, We came unto the land whither thou sentest us; and surely it floweth with milk and honey; and this is the fruit of it.

YLT: And they recount to him, and say, `We came in unto the land whither thou hast sent us, and also it is flowing with milk and honey--and this is its fruit;

Exposition: Numbers 13:27 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And they told him, and said, We came unto the land whither thou sentest us, and surely it floweth with milk and honey; and this is the fruit of it.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 13:28

Hebrew

אֶפֶס כִּֽי־עַז הָעָם הַיֹּשֵׁב בָּאָרֶץ וְהֶֽעָרִים בְּצֻרוֹת גְּדֹלֹת מְאֹד וְגַם־יְלִדֵי הֽ͏ָעֲנָק רָאִינוּ שָֽׁם׃

'efes-khiy-'az-ha'am-hayoshev-va'aretz-vehe'ariym-vetzurvot-gedolot-me'od-vegam-yelidey-ha'anaq-ra'iynv-sham

KJV: Nevertheless the people be strong that dwell in the land, and the cities are walled, and very great: and moreover we saw the children of Anak there.

AKJV: Nevertheless the people be strong that dwell in the land, and the cities are walled, and very great: and moreover we saw the children of Anak there.

ASV: Howbeit the people that dwell in the land are strong, and the cities are fortified, and very great: and moreover we saw the children of Anak there.

YLT: only, surely the people which is dwelling in the land is strong; and the cities are fenced, very great; and also children of Anak we have seen there.

Exposition: Numbers 13:28 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Nevertheless the people be strong that dwell in the land, and the cities are walled, and very great: and moreover we saw the children of Anak there.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 13:29

Hebrew

עֲמָלֵק יוֹשֵׁב בְּאֶרֶץ הַנֶּגֶב וְהַֽחִתִּי וְהַיְבוּסִי וְהָֽאֱמֹרִי יוֹשֵׁב בָּהָר וְהַֽכְּנַעֲנִי יֹשֵׁב עַל־הַיָּם וְעַל יַד הַיַּרְדֵּֽן׃

'amaleq-yvoshev-ve'eretz-hanegev-vehachitiy-vehayevvsiy-veha'emoriy-yvoshev-vahar-vehakhena'aniy-yoshev-'al-hayam-ve'al-yad-hayareden

KJV: The Amalekites dwell in the land of the south: and the Hittites, and the Jebusites, and the Amorites, dwell in the mountains: and the Canaanites dwell by the sea, and by the coast of Jordan.

AKJV: The Amalekites dwell in the land of the south: and the Hittites, and the Jebusites, and the Amorites, dwell in the mountains: and the Canaanites dwell by the sea, and by the coast of Jordan.

ASV: Amalek dwelleth in the land of the South: and the Hittite, and the Jebusite, and the Amorite, dwell in the hill-country; and the Canaanite dwelleth by the sea, and along by the side of the Jordan.

YLT: Amalek is dwelling in the land of the south, and the Hittite, and the Jebusite, and the Amorite is dwelling in the hill country, and the Canaanite is dwelling by the sea, and by the side of the Jordan.'

Exposition: Numbers 13:29 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'The Amalekites dwell in the land of the south: and the Hittites, and the Jebusites, and the Amorites, dwell in the mountains: and the Canaanites dwell by the sea, and by the coast of Jordan.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 13:30

Hebrew

וַיַּהַס כָּלֵב אֶת־הָעָם אֶל־מֹשֶׁה וַיֹּאמֶר עָלֹה נַעֲלֶה וְיָרַשְׁנוּ אֹתָהּ כִּֽי־יָכוֹל נוּכַל לָֽהּ׃

vayahas-khalev-'et-ha'am-'el-mosheh-vayo'mer-'aloh-na'aleh-veyarashenv-'otah-khiy-yakhvol-nvkhal-lah

KJV: And Caleb stilled the people before Moses, and said, Let us go up at once, and possess it; for we are well able to overcome it.

AKJV: And Caleb stilled the people before Moses, and said, Let us go up at once, and possess it; for we are well able to overcome it.

ASV: And Caleb stilled the people before Moses, and said, Let us go up at once, and possess it; for we are well able to overcome it.

YLT: And Caleb stilleth the people concerning Moses, and saith, `Let us certainly go up--and we have possessed it; for we are thoroughly able for it.'

Exposition: Numbers 13:30 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Caleb stilled the people before Moses, and said, Let us go up at once, and possess it; for we are well able to overcome it.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 13:31

Hebrew

וְהָאֲנָשִׁים אֲשֶׁר־עָלוּ עִמּוֹ אָֽמְרוּ לֹא נוּכַל לַעֲלוֹת אֶל־הָעָם כִּֽי־חָזָק הוּא מִמֶּֽנּוּ׃

veha'anashiym-'asher-'alv-'imvo-'amerv-lo'-nvkhal-la'alvot-'el-ha'am-khiy-chazaq-hv'-mimenv

KJV: But the men that went up with him said, We be not able to go up against the people; for they are stronger than we.

AKJV: But the men that went up with him said, We be not able to go up against the people; for they are stronger than we.

ASV: But the men that went up with him said, We are not able to go up against the people; for they are stronger than we.

YLT: And the men who have gone up with him said, `We are not able to go up against the people, for it is stronger than we;'

Exposition: Numbers 13:31 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'But the men that went up with him said, We be not able to go up against the people; for they are stronger than we.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 13:32

Hebrew

וַיּוֹצִיאוּ דִּבַּת הָאָרֶץ אֲשֶׁר תָּרוּ אֹתָהּ אֶל־בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל לֵאמֹר הָאָרֶץ אֲשֶׁר עָבַרְנוּ בָהּ לָתוּר אֹתָהּ אֶרֶץ אֹכֶלֶת יוֹשְׁבֶיהָ הִוא וְכָל־הָעָם אֲשֶׁר־רָאִינוּ בְתוֹכָהּ אַנְשֵׁי מִדּֽוֹת׃

vayvotziy'v-divat-ha'aretz-'asher-tarv-'otah-'el-veney-yishera'el-le'mor-ha'aretz-'asher-'avarenv-vah-latvr-'otah-'eretz-'okhelet-yvosheveyha-hiv'-vekhal-ha'am-'asher-ra'iynv-vetvokhah-'aneshey-midvot

KJV: And they brought up an evil report of the land which they had searched unto the children of Israel, saying, The land, through which we have gone to search it, is a land that eateth up the inhabitants thereof; and all the people that we saw in it are men of a great stature.

AKJV: And they brought up an evil report of the land which they had searched to the children of Israel, saying, The land, through which we have gone to search it, is a land that eats up the inhabitants thereof; and all the people that we saw in it are men of a great stature.

ASV: And they brought up an evil report of the land which they had spied out unto the children of Israel, saying, The land, through which we have gone to spy it out, is a land that eateth up the inhabitants thereof; and all the people that we saw in it are men of great stature.

YLT: and they bring out an evil account of the land which they have spied unto the sons of Israel, saying, `The land into which we passed over to spy it, is a land eating up its inhabitants; and all the people whom we saw in its midst are men of stature;

Exposition: Numbers 13:32 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And they brought up an evil report of the land which they had searched unto the children of Israel, saying, The land, through which we have gone to search it, is a land that eateth up the inhabitants thereof; and all...'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 13:33

Hebrew

וְשָׁם רָאִינוּ אֶת־הַנְּפִילִים בְּנֵי עֲנָק מִן־הַנְּפִלִים וַנְּהִי בְעֵינֵינוּ כּֽ͏ַחֲגָבִים וְכֵן הָיִינוּ בְּעֵינֵיהֶֽם׃

vesham-ra'iynv-'et-hanefiyliym-veney-'anaq-min-hanefiliym-vanehiy-ve'eyneynv-khachagaviym-vekhen-hayiynv-ve'eyneyhem

KJV: And there we saw the giants, the sons of Anak, which come of the giants: and we were in our own sight as grasshoppers, and so we were in their sight.

AKJV: And there we saw the giants, the sons of Anak, which come of the giants: and we were in our own sight as grasshoppers, and so we were in their sight.

ASV: And there we saw the Nephilim, the sons of Anak, who come of the Nephilim: and we were in our own sight as grasshoppers, and so we were in their sight.

YLT: and there we saw the Nephilim, sons of Anak, of the Nephilim; and we are in our own eyes as grasshoppers; and so we were in their eyes.'

Exposition: Numbers 13:33 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And there we saw the giants, the sons of Anak, which come of the giants: and we were in our own sight as grasshoppers, and so we were in their sight.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.