Apologetics Bible

Numbers 26:1

Hebrew

וַיֹּאמֶר יְהוָה אֶל־מֹשֶׁה וְאֶל אֶלְעָזָר בֶּן־אַהֲרֹן הַכֹּהֵן לֵאמֹֽר׃

vayo'mer-yehvah-'el-mosheh-ve'el-'ele'azar-ven-'aharon-hakhohen-le'mor

KJV: And it came to pass after the plague, that the LORD spake unto Moses and unto Eleazar the son of Aaron the priest, saying,

AKJV: And it came to pass after the plague, that the LORD spoke to Moses and to Eleazar the son of Aaron the priest, saying,

ASV: And it came to pass after the plague, that Jehovah spake unto Moses and unto Eleazar the son of Aaron the priest, saying,

YLT: And it cometh to pass, after the plague, that Jehovah speaketh unto Moses, and unto Eleazar son of Aaron the priest, saying,

Exposition: Numbers 26:1 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And it came to pass after the plague, that the LORD spake unto Moses and unto Eleazar the son of Aaron the priest, saying,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 26:2

Hebrew

שְׂאוּ אֶת־רֹאשׁ ׀ כָּל־עֲדַת בְּנֵי־יִשְׂרָאֵל מִבֶּן עֶשְׂרִים שָׁנָה וָמַעְלָה לְבֵית אֲבֹתָם כָּל־יֹצֵא צָבָא בְּיִשְׂרָאֵֽל׃

she'v-'et-ro'sh- -khal-'adat-veney-yishera'el-miven-'esheriym-shanah-vama'elah-leveyt-'avotam-khal-yotze'-tzava'-veyishera'el

KJV: Take the sum of all the congregation of the children of Israel, from twenty years old and upward, throughout their fathers’ house, all that are able to go to war in Israel.

AKJV: Take the sum of all the congregation of the children of Israel, from twenty years old and upward, throughout their fathers’ house, all that are able to go to war in Israel.

ASV: Take the sum of all the congregation of the children of Israel, from twenty years old and upward, by their fathers’ houses, all that are able to go forth to war in Israel.

YLT: `Take up the sum of all the company of the sons of Israel, from a son of twenty years and upward, by the house of their fathers, every one going out to the host in Israel.'

Exposition: Numbers 26:2 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Take the sum of all the congregation of the children of Israel, from twenty years old and upward, throughout their fathers’ house, all that are able to go to war in Israel.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 26:3

Hebrew

וַיְדַבֵּר מֹשֶׁה וְאֶלְעָזָר הַכֹּהֵן אֹתָם בְּעַֽרְבֹת מוֹאָב עַל־יַרְדֵּן יְרֵחוֹ לֵאמֹֽר׃

vayedaver-mosheh-ve'ele'azar-hakhohen-'otam-ve'arevot-mvo'av-'al-yareden-yerechvo-le'mor

KJV: And Moses and Eleazar the priest spake with them in the plains of Moab by Jordan near Jericho, saying,

AKJV: And Moses and Eleazar the priest spoke with them in the plains of Moab by Jordan near Jericho, saying,

ASV: And Moses and Eleazar the priest spake with them in the plains of Moab by the Jordan at Jericho, saying,

YLT: And Moses speaketh--Eleazar the priest also--with them, in the plains of Moab, by Jordan, near Jericho, saying,

Exposition: Numbers 26:3 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Moses and Eleazar the priest spake with them in the plains of Moab by Jordan near Jericho, saying,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 26:4

Hebrew

מִבֶּן עֶשְׂרִים שָׁנָה וָמָעְלָה כַּאֲשֶׁר צִוָּה יְהוָה אֶת־מֹשֶׁה וּבְנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל הַיֹּצְאִים מֵאֶרֶץ מִצְרָֽיִם׃

miven-'esheriym-shanah-vama'elah-kha'asher-tzivah-yehvah-'et-mosheh-vveney-yishera'el-hayotze'iym-me'eretz-mitzerayim

KJV: Take the sum of the people, from twenty years old and upward; as the LORD commanded Moses and the children of Israel, which went forth out of the land of Egypt.

AKJV: Take the sum of the people, from twenty years old and upward; as the LORD commanded Moses and the children of Israel, which went forth out of the land of Egypt. ¶

ASV: Take the sum of the people, from twenty years old and upward; as Jehovah commanded Moses and the children of Israel, that came forth out of the land of Egypt.

YLT: `From a son of twenty years and upward,' as Jehovah hath commanded Moses and the sons of Israel who are coming out from the land of Egypt.

Exposition: Numbers 26:4 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Take the sum of the people, from twenty years old and upward; as the LORD commanded Moses and the children of Israel, which went forth out of the land of Egypt.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 26:5

Hebrew

רְאוּבֵן בְּכוֹר יִשְׂרָאֵל בְּנֵי רְאוּבֵן חֲנוֹךְ מִשְׁפַּחַת הַחֲנֹכִי לְפַלּוּא מִשְׁפַּחַת הַפַּלֻּאִֽי׃

re'vven-vekhvor-yishera'el-veney-re'vven-chanvokhe-mishefachat-hachanokhiy-lefalv'-mishefachat-hafalu'iy

KJV: Reuben, the eldest son of Israel: the children of Reuben; Hanoch, of whom cometh the family of the Hanochites: of Pallu, the family of the Palluites:

AKJV: Reuben, the oldest son of Israel: the children of Reuben; Hanoch, of whom comes the family of the Hanochites: of Pallu, the family of the Palluites:

ASV: Reuben, the first-born of Israel; the sons of Reuben: of Hanoch, the family of the Hanochites; of Pallu, the family of the Palluites;

YLT: Reuben, first-born of Israel--sons of Reuben: of Hanoch is the family of the Hanochite; of Pallu the family of the Palluite;

Exposition: Numbers 26:5 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Reuben, the eldest son of Israel: the children of Reuben; Hanoch, of whom cometh the family of the Hanochites: of Pallu, the family of the Palluites:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 26:6

Hebrew

לְחֶצְרֹן מִשְׁפַּחַת הַֽחֶצְרוֹנִי לְכַרְמִי מִשְׁפַּחַת הַכַּרְמִֽי׃

lechetzeron-mishefachat-hachetzervoniy-lekharemiy-mishefachat-hakharemiy

KJV: Of Hezron, the family of the Hezronites: of Carmi, the family of the Carmites.

AKJV: Of Hezron, the family of the Hezronites: of Carmi, the family of the Carmites.

ASV: of Hezron, the family of the Hezronites; of Carmi, the family of the Carmites.

YLT: of Hezron the family of the Hezronite; of Carmi the family of the Carmite.

Exposition: Numbers 26:6 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Of Hezron, the family of the Hezronites: of Carmi, the family of the Carmites.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 26:7

Hebrew

אֵלֶּה מִשְׁפְּחֹת הָרֻֽאוּבֵנִי וַיִּהְיוּ פְקֻדֵיהֶם שְׁלֹשָׁה וְאַרְבָּעִים אֶלֶף וּשְׁבַע מֵאוֹת וּשְׁלֹשִֽׁים׃

'eleh-mishefechot-haru'vveniy-vayiheyv-fequdeyhem-sheloshah-ve'areva'iym-'elef-vsheva'-me'vot-vsheloshiym

KJV: These are the families of the Reubenites: and they that were numbered of them were forty and three thousand and seven hundred and thirty.

AKJV: These are the families of the Reubenites: and they that were numbered of them were forty and three thousand and seven hundred and thirty.

ASV: These are the families of the Reubenites; and they that were numbered of them were forty and three thousand and seven hundred and thirty.

YLT: These are families of the Reubenite, and their numbered ones are three and forty thousand and seven hundred and thirty.

Exposition: Numbers 26:7 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'These are the families of the Reubenites: and they that were numbered of them were forty and three thousand and seven hundred and thirty.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 26:8

Hebrew

וּבְנֵי פַלּוּא אֱלִיאָֽב׃

vveney-falv'-'eliy'av

KJV: And the sons of Pallu; Eliab.

AKJV: And the sons of Pallu; Eliab.

ASV: And the sons of Pallu: Eliab.

YLT: And the son of Pallu is Eliab;

Exposition: Numbers 26:8 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And the sons of Pallu; Eliab.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 26:9

Hebrew

וּבְנֵי אֱלִיאָב נְמוּאֵל וְדָתָן וַאֲבִירָם הֽוּא־דָתָן וַאֲבִירָם קרואי קְרִיאֵי הָעֵדָה אֲשֶׁר הִצּוּ עַל־מֹשֶׁה וְעַֽל־אַהֲרֹן בַּעֲדַת־קֹרַח בְּהַצֹּתָם עַל־יְהוָֽה׃

vveney-'eliy'av-nemv'el-vedatan-va'aviyram-hv'-datan-va'aviyram-qrv'y-qeriy'ey-ha'edah-'asher-hitzv-'al-mosheh-ve'al-'aharon-va'adat-qorach-vehatzotam-'al-yehvah

KJV: And the sons of Eliab; Nemuel, and Dathan, and Abiram. This is that Dathan and Abiram, which were famous in the congregation, who strove against Moses and against Aaron in the company of Korah, when they strove against the LORD:

AKJV: And the sons of Eliab; Nemuel, and Dathan, and Abiram. This is that Dathan and Abiram, which were famous in the congregation, who strove against Moses and against Aaron in the company of Korah, when they strove against the LORD:

ASV: And the sons of Eliab: Nemuel, and Dathan, and Abiram. These are that Dathan and Abiram, who were called of the congregation, who strove against Moses and against Aaron in the company of Korah, when they strove against Jehovah,

YLT: and the sons of Eliab are Nemuel and Dathan and Abiram; this is that Dathan and Abiram, called ones of the company, who have striven against Moses and against Aaron in the company of Korah, in their striving against Jehovah,

Exposition: Numbers 26:9 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And the sons of Eliab; Nemuel, and Dathan, and Abiram. This is that Dathan and Abiram, which were famous in the congregation, who strove against Moses and against Aaron in the company of Korah, when they strove agains...'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 26:10

Hebrew

וַתִּפְתַּח הָאָרֶץ אֶת־פִּיהָ וַתִּבְלַע אֹתָם וְאֶת־קֹרַח בְּמוֹת הָעֵדָה בַּאֲכֹל הָאֵשׁ אֵת חֲמִשִּׁים וּמָאתַיִם אִישׁ וַיִּהְיוּ לְנֵֽס׃

vatifetach-ha'aretz-'et-fiyha-vativela'-'otam-ve'et-qorach-vemvot-ha'edah-va'akhol-ha'esh-'et-chamishiym-vma'tayim-'iysh-vayiheyv-lenes

KJV: And the earth opened her mouth, and swallowed them up together with Korah, when that company died, what time the fire devoured two hundred and fifty men: and they became a sign.

AKJV: And the earth opened her mouth, and swallowed them up together with Korah, when that company died, what time the fire devoured two hundred and fifty men: and they became a sign.

ASV: and the earth opened its mouth, and swallowed them up together with Korah, when that company died; what time the fire devoured two hundred and fifty men, and they became a sign.

YLT: and the earth openeth her mouth, and swalloweth them and Korah, in the death of the company, in the fire consuming the two hundred and fifty men, and they become a sign;

Exposition: Numbers 26:10 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And the earth opened her mouth, and swallowed them up together with Korah, when that company died, what time the fire devoured two hundred and fifty men: and they became a sign.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 26:11

Hebrew

וּבְנֵי־קֹרַח לֹא־מֵֽתוּ׃

vveney-qorach-lo'-metv

KJV: Notwithstanding the children of Korah died not.

AKJV: Notwithstanding the children of Korah died not. ¶

ASV: Notwithstanding, the sons of Korah died not.

YLT: and the sons of Korah died not.

Exposition: Numbers 26:11 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Notwithstanding the children of Korah died not.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 26:12

Hebrew

בְּנֵי שִׁמְעוֹן לְמִשְׁפְּחֹתָם לִנְמוּאֵל מִשְׁפַּחַת הַנְּמוּאֵלִי לְיָמִין מִשְׁפַּחַת הַיָּמִינִי לְיָכִין מִשְׁפַּחַת הַיָּכִינִֽי׃

veney-shime'von-lemishefechotam-linemv'el-mishefachat-hanemv'eliy-leyamiyn-mishefachat-hayamiyniy-leyakhiyn-mishefachat-hayakhiyniy

KJV: The sons of Simeon after their families: of Nemuel, the family of the Nemuelites: of Jamin, the family of the Jaminites: of Jachin, the family of the Jachinites:

AKJV: The sons of Simeon after their families: of Nemuel, the family of the Nemuelites: of Jamin, the family of the Jaminites: of Jachin, the family of the Jachinites:

ASV: The sons of Simeon after their families: of Nemuel, the family of the Nemuelites; of Jamin, the family of the Jaminites; of Jachin, the family of the Jachinites;

YLT: Sons of Simeon by their families: of Nemuel is the family of the Nemuelite; of Jamin the family of the Jaminite; of Jachin the family of the Jachinite;

Exposition: Numbers 26:12 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'The sons of Simeon after their families: of Nemuel, the family of the Nemuelites: of Jamin, the family of the Jaminites: of Jachin, the family of the Jachinites:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 26:13

Hebrew

לְזֶרַח מִשְׁפַּחַת הַזַּרְחִי לְשָׁאוּל מִשְׁפַּחַת הַשָּׁאוּלִֽי׃

lezerach-mishefachat-hazarechiy-lesha'vl-mishefachat-hasha'vliy

KJV: Of Zerah, the family of the Zarhites: of Shaul, the family of the Shaulites.

AKJV: Of Zerah, the family of the Zarhites: of Shaul, the family of the Shaulites.

ASV: of Zerah, the family of the Zerahites; of Shaul, the family of the Shaulites.

YLT: of Zerah the family of the Zarhite; of Shaul the family of the Shaulite.

Exposition: Numbers 26:13 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Of Zerah, the family of the Zarhites: of Shaul, the family of the Shaulites.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 26:14

Hebrew

אֵלֶּה מִשְׁפְּחֹת הַשִּׁמְעֹנִי שְׁנַיִם וְעֶשְׂרִים אֶלֶף וּמָאתָֽיִם׃

'eleh-mishefechot-hashime'oniy-shenayim-ve'esheriym-'elef-vma'tayim

KJV: These are the families of the Simeonites, twenty and two thousand and two hundred.

AKJV: These are the families of the Simeonites, twenty and two thousand and two hundred. ¶

ASV: These are the families of the Simeonites, twenty and two thousand and two hundred.

YLT: These are families of the Simeonite, two and twenty thousand and two hundred.

Exposition: Numbers 26:14 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'These are the families of the Simeonites, twenty and two thousand and two hundred.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 26:15

Hebrew

בְּנֵי גָד לְמִשְׁפְּחֹתָם לִצְפוֹן מִשְׁפַּחַת הַצְּפוֹנִי לְחַגִּי מִשְׁפַּחַת הַֽחַגִּי לְשׁוּנִי מִשְׁפַּחַת הַשּׁוּנִֽי׃

veney-gad-lemishefechotam-litzefvon-mishefachat-hatzefvoniy-lechagiy-mishefachat-hachagiy-leshvniy-mishefachat-hashvniy

KJV: The children of Gad after their families: of Zephon, the family of the Zephonites: of Haggi, the family of the Haggites: of Shuni, the family of the Shunites:

AKJV: The children of Gad after their families: of Zephon, the family of the Zephonites: of Haggi, the family of the Haggites: of Shuni, the family of the Shunites:

ASV: The sons of Gad after their families: of Zephon, the family of the Zephonites; of Haggi, the family of the Haggites; of Shuni, the family of the Shunites;

YLT: Sons of Gad by their families: of Zephon is the family of the Zephonite; of Haggi the family of the Haggite; of Shuni the family of the Shunite;

Exposition: Numbers 26:15 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'The children of Gad after their families: of Zephon, the family of the Zephonites: of Haggi, the family of the Haggites: of Shuni, the family of the Shunites:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 26:16

Hebrew

לְאָזְנִי מִשְׁפַּחַת הָאָזְנִי לְעֵרִי מִשְׁפַּחַת הָעֵרִֽי׃

le'azeniy-mishefachat-ha'azeniy-le'eriy-mishefachat-ha'eriy

KJV: Of Ozni, the family of the Oznites: of Eri, the family of the Erites:

AKJV: Of Ozni, the family of the Oznites: of Eri, the family of the Erites:

ASV: of Ozni, the family of the Oznites; of Eri, the family of the Erites;

YLT: of Ozni the family of the Oznite; of Eri the family of the Erite:

Exposition: Numbers 26:16 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Of Ozni, the family of the Oznites: of Eri, the family of the Erites:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 26:17

Hebrew

לַאֲרוֹד מִשְׁפַּחַת הָאֲרוֹדִי לְאַרְאֵלִי מִשְׁפַּחַת הָאַרְאֵלִֽי׃

la'arvod-mishefachat-ha'arvodiy-le'are'eliy-mishefachat-ha'are'eliy

KJV: Of Arod, the family of the Arodites: of Areli, the family of the Arelites.

AKJV: Of Arod, the family of the Arodites: of Areli, the family of the Arelites.

ASV: of Arod, the family of the Arodites; of Areli, the family of the Arelites.

YLT: of Arod the family of the Arodite; of Areli the family of the Arelite.

Exposition: Numbers 26:17 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Of Arod, the family of the Arodites: of Areli, the family of the Arelites.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 26:18

Hebrew

אֵלֶּה מִשְׁפְּחֹת בְּנֵֽי־גָד לִפְקֻדֵיהֶם אַרְבָּעִים אֶלֶף וַחֲמֵשׁ מֵאֽוֹת׃

'eleh-mishefechot-veney-gad-lifequdeyhem-'areva'iym-'elef-vachamesh-me'vot

KJV: These are the families of the children of Gad according to those that were numbered of them, forty thousand and five hundred.

AKJV: These are the families of the children of Gad according to those that were numbered of them, forty thousand and five hundred. ¶

ASV: These are the families of the sons of Gad according to those that were numbered of them, forty thousand and five hundred.

YLT: These are families of the sons of Gad, by their numbered ones, forty thousand and five hundred.

Exposition: Numbers 26:18 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'These are the families of the children of Gad according to those that were numbered of them, forty thousand and five hundred.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 26:19

Hebrew

בְּנֵי יְהוּדָה עֵר וְאוֹנָן וַיָּמָת עֵר וְאוֹנָן בְּאֶרֶץ כְּנָֽעַן׃

veney-yehvdah-'er-ve'vonan-vayamat-'er-ve'vonan-ve'eretz-khena'an

KJV: The sons of Judah were Er and Onan: and Er and Onan died in the land of Canaan.

AKJV: The sons of Judah were Er and Onan: and Er and Onan died in the land of Canaan.

ASV: The sons of Judah: Er and Onan; and Er and Onan died in the land of Canaan.

YLT: Sons of Judah are Er and Onan; and Er dieth--Onan also--in the land of Canaan.

Exposition: Numbers 26:19 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'The sons of Judah were Er and Onan: and Er and Onan died in the land of Canaan.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 26:20

Hebrew

וַיִּהְיוּ בְנֵי־יְהוּדָה לְמִשְׁפְּחֹתָם לְשֵׁלָה מִשְׁפַּחַת הַשֵּׁלָנִי לְפֶרֶץ מִשְׁפַּחַת הַפַּרְצִי לְזֶרַח מִשְׁפַּחַת הַזַּרְחִֽי׃

vayiheyv-veney-yehvdah-lemishefechotam-leshelah-mishefachat-hashelaniy-leferetz-mishefachat-hafaretziy-lezerach-mishefachat-hazarechiy

KJV: And the sons of Judah after their families were; of Shelah, the family of the Shelanites: of Pharez, the family of the Pharzites: of Zerah, the family of the Zarhites.

AKJV: And the sons of Judah after their families were; of Shelah, the family of the Shelanites: of Pharez, the family of the Pharzites: of Zerah, the family of the Zarhites.

ASV: And the sons of Judah after their families were: of Shelah, the family of the Shelanites; of Perez, the family of the Perezites; of Zerah, the family of the Zerahites.

YLT: And sons of Judah, by their families, are: of Shelah the family of the Shelanite; of Pharez the family of the Pharzite; of Zerah the family of the Zarhite;

Exposition: Numbers 26:20 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And the sons of Judah after their families were; of Shelah, the family of the Shelanites: of Pharez, the family of the Pharzites: of Zerah, the family of the Zarhites.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 26:21

Hebrew

וַיִּהְיוּ בְנֵי־פֶרֶץ לְחֶצְרֹן מִשְׁפַּחַת הַֽחֶצְרֹנִי לְחָמוּל מִשְׁפַּחַת הֶחָמוּלִֽי׃

vayiheyv-veney-feretz-lechetzeron-mishefachat-hachetzeroniy-lechamvl-mishefachat-hechamvliy

KJV: And the sons of Pharez were; of Hezron, the family of the Hezronites: of Hamul, the family of the Hamulites.

AKJV: And the sons of Pharez were; of Hezron, the family of the Hezronites: of Hamul, the family of the Hamulites.

ASV: And the sons of Perez were: of Hezron, the family of the Hezronites; of Hamul, the family of the Hamulites.

YLT: and sons of Pharez are: of Hezron the family of the Hezronite; of Hamul the family of the Hamulite.

Exposition: Numbers 26:21 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And the sons of Pharez were; of Hezron, the family of the Hezronites: of Hamul, the family of the Hamulites.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 26:22

Hebrew

אֵלֶּה מִשְׁפְּחֹת יְהוּדָה לִפְקֻדֵיהֶם שִׁשָּׁה וְשִׁבְעִים אֶלֶף וַחֲמֵשׁ מֵאֽוֹת׃

'eleh-mishefechot-yehvdah-lifequdeyhem-shishah-veshive'iym-'elef-vachamesh-me'vot

KJV: These are the families of Judah according to those that were numbered of them, threescore and sixteen thousand and five hundred.

AKJV: These are the families of Judah according to those that were numbered of them, three score and sixteen thousand and five hundred. ¶

ASV: These are the families of Judah according to those that were numbered of them, threescore and sixteen thousand and five hundred.

YLT: These are families of Judah, by their numbered ones, six and seventy thousand and five hundred.

Exposition: Numbers 26:22 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'These are the families of Judah according to those that were numbered of them, threescore and sixteen thousand and five hundred.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 26:23

Hebrew

בְּנֵי יִשָּׂשכָר לְמִשְׁפְּחֹתָם תּוֹלָע מִשְׁפַּחַת הַתּוֹלָעִי לְפֻוָה מִשְׁפַּחַת הַפּוּנִֽי׃

veney-yishashkhar-lemishefechotam-tvola'-mishefachat-hatvola'iy-lefuvah-mishefachat-hafvniy

KJV: Of the sons of Issachar after their families: of Tola, the family of the Tolaites: of Pua, the family of the Punites:

AKJV: Of the sons of Issachar after their families: of Tola, the family of the Tolaites: of Pua, the family of the Punites:

ASV: The sons of Issachar after their families: of Tola, the family of the Tolaites; of Puvah, the family of the Punites;

YLT: Sons of Issachar by their families; of Tola is the family of the Tolaite; of Pua the family of the Punite;

Exposition: Numbers 26:23 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Of the sons of Issachar after their families: of Tola, the family of the Tolaites: of Pua, the family of the Punites:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 26:24

Hebrew

לְיָשׁוּב מִשְׁפַּחַת הַיָּשׁוּבִי לְשִׁמְרֹן מִשְׁפַּחַת הַשִּׁמְרֹנִֽי׃

leyashvv-mishefachat-hayashvviy-leshimeron-mishefachat-hashimeroniy

KJV: Of Jashub, the family of the Jashubites: of Shimron, the family of the Shimronites.

AKJV: Of Jashub, the family of the Jashubites: of Shimron, the family of the Shimronites.

ASV: of Jashub, the family of the Jashubites; of Shimron, the family of the Shimronites.

YLT: of Jashub the family of the Jashubite; of Shimron the family of the Shimronite.

Exposition: Numbers 26:24 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Of Jashub, the family of the Jashubites: of Shimron, the family of the Shimronites.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 26:25

Hebrew

אֵלֶּה מִשְׁפְּחֹת יִשָּׂשכָר לִפְקֻדֵיהֶם אַרְבָּעָה וְשִׁשִּׁים אֶלֶף וּשְׁלֹשׁ מֵאֽוֹת׃

'eleh-mishefechot-yishashkhar-lifequdeyhem-'areva'ah-veshishiym-'elef-vshelosh-me'vot

KJV: These are the families of Issachar according to those that were numbered of them, threescore and four thousand and three hundred.

AKJV: These are the families of Issachar according to those that were numbered of them, three score and four thousand and three hundred. ¶

ASV: These are the families of Issachar according to those that were numbered of them, threescore and four thousand and three hundred.

YLT: These are families of Issachar, by their numbered ones, four and sixty thousand and three hundred.

Exposition: Numbers 26:25 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'These are the families of Issachar according to those that were numbered of them, threescore and four thousand and three hundred.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 26:26

Hebrew

בְּנֵי זְבוּלֻן לְמִשְׁפְּחֹתָם לְסֶרֶד מִשְׁפַּחַת הַסַּרְדִּי לְאֵלוֹן מִשְׁפַּחַת הָאֵלֹנִי לְיַחְלְאֵל מִשְׁפַּחַת הַיַּחְלְאֵלִֽי׃

veney-zevvlun-lemishefechotam-lesered-mishefachat-hasarediy-le'elvon-mishefachat-ha'eloniy-leyachele'el-mishefachat-hayachele'eliy

KJV: Of the sons of Zebulun after their families: of Sered, the family of the Sardites: of Elon, the family of the Elonites: of Jahleel, the family of the Jahleelites.

AKJV: Of the sons of Zebulun after their families: of Sered, the family of the Sardites: of Elon, the family of the Elonites: of Jahleel, the family of the Jahleelites.

ASV: The sons of Zebulun after their families: of Sered, the family of the Seredites; of Elon, the family of the Elonites; of Jahleel, the family of the Jahleelites.

YLT: Sons of Zebulun by their families: of Sered is the family of the Sardite; of Elon the family of the Elonite; of Jahleel the family of the Jahleelite.

Exposition: Numbers 26:26 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Of the sons of Zebulun after their families: of Sered, the family of the Sardites: of Elon, the family of the Elonites: of Jahleel, the family of the Jahleelites.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 26:27

Hebrew

אֵלֶּה מִשְׁפְּחֹת הַזְּבוּלֹנִי לִפְקֻדֵיהֶם שִׁשִּׁים אֶלֶף וַחֲמֵשׁ מֵאֽוֹת׃

'eleh-mishefechot-hazevvloniy-lifequdeyhem-shishiym-'elef-vachamesh-me'vot

KJV: These are the families of the Zebulunites according to those that were numbered of them, threescore thousand and five hundred.

AKJV: These are the families of the Zebulunites according to those that were numbered of them, three score thousand and five hundred. ¶

ASV: These are the families of the Zebulunites according to those that were numbered of them, threescore thousand and five hundred.

YLT: These are families of the Zebulunite by their numbered ones, sixty thousand and five hundred.

Exposition: Numbers 26:27 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'These are the families of the Zebulunites according to those that were numbered of them, threescore thousand and five hundred.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 26:28

Hebrew

בְּנֵי יוֹסֵף לְמִשְׁפְּחֹתָם מְנַשֶּׁה וְאֶפְרָֽיִם׃

veney-yvosef-lemishefechotam-menasheh-ve'eferayim

KJV: The sons of Joseph after their families were Manasseh and Ephraim.

AKJV: The sons of Joseph after their families were Manasseh and Ephraim.

ASV: The sons of Joseph after their families: Manasseh and Ephraim.

YLT: Sons of Joseph by their families are Manasseh and Ephraim.

Exposition: Numbers 26:28 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'The sons of Joseph after their families were Manasseh and Ephraim.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 26:29

Hebrew

בְּנֵי מְנַשֶּׁה לְמָכִיר מִשְׁפַּחַת הַמָּכִירִי וּמָכִיר הוֹלִיד אֶת־גִּלְעָד לְגִלְעָד מִשְׁפַּחַת הַגִּלְעָדִֽי׃

veney-menasheh-lemakhiyr-mishefachat-hamakhiyriy-vmakhiyr-hvoliyd-'et-gile'ad-legile'ad-mishefachat-hagile'adiy

KJV: Of the sons of Manasseh: of Machir, the family of the Machirites: and Machir begat Gilead: of Gilead come the family of the Gileadites.

AKJV: Of the sons of Manasseh: of Machir, the family of the Machirites: and Machir begat Gilead: of Gilead come the family of the Gileadites.

ASV: The sons of Manasseh: of Machir, the family of the Machirites; and Machir begat Gilead: of Gilead, the family of the Gileadites.

YLT: Sons of Manasseh: of Machir is the family of the Machirite; and Machir hath begotten Gilead; of Gilead is the family of the Gileadite.

Exposition: Numbers 26:29 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Of the sons of Manasseh: of Machir, the family of the Machirites: and Machir begat Gilead: of Gilead come the family of the Gileadites.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 26:30

Hebrew

אֵלֶּה בְּנֵי גִלְעָד אִיעֶזֶר מִשְׁפַּחַת הָאִֽיעֶזְרִי לְחֵלֶק מִשְׁפַּחַת הַֽחֶלְקִֽי׃

'eleh-veney-gile'ad-'iy'ezer-mishefachat-ha'iy'ezeriy-lecheleq-mishefachat-hacheleqiy

KJV: These are the sons of Gilead: of Jeezer, the family of the Jeezerites: of Helek, the family of the Helekites:

AKJV: These are the sons of Gilead: of Jeezer, the family of the Jeezerites: of Helek, the family of the Helekites:

ASV: These are the sons of Gilead: of Iezer, the family of the Iezerites; of Helek, the family of the Helekites;

YLT: These are sons of Gilead: of Jeezer is the family of the Jeezerite; of Helek the family of the Helekite;

Exposition: Numbers 26:30 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'These are the sons of Gilead: of Jeezer, the family of the Jeezerites: of Helek, the family of the Helekites:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 26:31

Hebrew

וְאַשְׂרִיאֵל מִשְׁפַּחַת הָֽאַשְׂרִֽאֵלִי וְשֶׁכֶם מִשְׁפַּחַת הַשִּׁכְמִֽי׃

ve'asheriy'el-mishefachat-ha'asheri'eliy-veshekhem-mishefachat-hashikhemiy

KJV: And of Asriel, the family of the Asrielites: and of Shechem, the family of the Shechemites:

AKJV: And of Asriel, the family of the Asrielites: and of Shechem, the family of the Shechemites:

ASV: and of Asriel, the family of the Asrielites; and of Shechem, the family of the Shechemites;

YLT: and of Asriel the family of the Asrielite; and of Shechem the family of the Shechemite;

Exposition: Numbers 26:31 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And of Asriel, the family of the Asrielites: and of Shechem, the family of the Shechemites:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 26:32

Hebrew

וּשְׁמִידָע מִשְׁפַּחַת הַשְּׁמִידָעִי וְחֵפֶר מִשְׁפַּחַת הַֽחֶפְרִֽי׃

vshemiyda'-mishefachat-hashemiyda'iy-vechefer-mishefachat-hacheferiy

KJV: And of Shemida, the family of the Shemidaites: and of Hepher, the family of the Hepherites.

AKJV: And of Shemida, the family of the Shemidaites: and of Hepher, the family of the Hepherites. ¶

ASV: and of Shemida, the family of the Shemidaites; and of Hepher, the family of the Hepherites.

YLT: and of Shemida the family of the Shemidaite; and of Hepher the family of the Hepherite.

Exposition: Numbers 26:32 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And of Shemida, the family of the Shemidaites: and of Hepher, the family of the Hepherites.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 26:33

Hebrew

וּצְלָפְחָד בֶּן־חֵפֶר לֹא־הָיוּ לוֹ בָּנִים כִּי אִם־בָּנוֹת וְשֵׁם בְּנוֹת צְלָפְחָד מַחְלָה וְנֹעָה חָגְלָה מִלְכָּה וְתִרְצָֽה׃

vtzelafechad-ven-chefer-lo'-hayv-lvo-vaniym-khiy-'im-vanvot-veshem-venvot-tzelafechad-machelah-veno'ah-chagelah-milekhah-vetiretzah

KJV: And Zelophehad the son of Hepher had no sons, but daughters: and the names of the daughters of Zelophehad were Mahlah, and Noah, Hoglah, Milcah, and Tirzah.

AKJV: And Zelophehad the son of Hepher had no sons, but daughters: and the names of the daughters of Zelophehad were Mahlah, and Noah, Hoglah, Milcah, and Tirzah.

ASV: And Zelophehad the son of Hepher had no sons, but daughters: and the names of the daughters of Zelophehad were Mahlah, and Noah, Hoglah, Milcah, and Tirzah.

YLT: And Zelophehad son of Hepher had no sons but daughters, and the names of the daughters of Zelophehad are Mahlah, and Noah, Hoglah, Milcah, and Tirzah.

Exposition: Numbers 26:33 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Zelophehad the son of Hepher had no sons, but daughters: and the names of the daughters of Zelophehad were Mahlah, and Noah, Hoglah, Milcah, and Tirzah.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 26:34

Hebrew

אֵלֶּה מִשְׁפְּחֹת מְנַשֶּׁה וּפְקֻדֵיהֶם שְׁנַיִם וַחֲמִשִּׁים אֶלֶף וּשְׁבַע מֵאֽוֹת׃

'eleh-mishefechot-menasheh-vfequdeyhem-shenayim-vachamishiym-'elef-vsheva'-me'vot

KJV: These are the families of Manasseh, and those that were numbered of them, fifty and two thousand and seven hundred.

AKJV: These are the families of Manasseh, and those that were numbered of them, fifty and two thousand and seven hundred. ¶

ASV: These are the families of Manasseh; and they that were numbered of them were fifty and two thousand and seven hundred.

YLT: These are families of Manasseh, and their numbered ones are two and fifty thousand and seven hundred.

Exposition: Numbers 26:34 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'These are the families of Manasseh, and those that were numbered of them, fifty and two thousand and seven hundred.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 26:35

Hebrew

אֵלֶּה בְנֵי־אֶפְרַיִם לְמִשְׁפְּחֹתָם לְשׁוּתֶלַח מִשְׁפַּחַת הַשֻּׁתַלְחִי לְבֶכֶר מִשְׁפַּחַת הַבַּכְרִי לְתַחַן מִשְׁפַּחַת הַֽתַּחֲנִֽי׃

'eleh-veney-'eferayim-lemishefechotam-leshvtelach-mishefachat-hashutalechiy-levekher-mishefachat-havakheriy-letachan-mishefachat-hatachaniy

KJV: These are the sons of Ephraim after their families: of Shuthelah, the family of the Shuthalhites: of Becher, the family of the Bachrites: of Tahan, the family of the Tahanites.

AKJV: These are the sons of Ephraim after their families: of Shuthelah, the family of the Shuthalhites: of Becher, the family of the Bachrites: of Tahan, the family of the Tahanites.

ASV: These are the sons of Ephraim after their families: of Shuthelah, the family of the Shuthelahites; of Becher, the family of the Becherites; of Tahan, the family of the Tahanites.

YLT: These are sons of Ephraim by their families: of Shuthelah is the family of the Shuthelhite; of Becher the family of the Bachrite; of Tahan the family of the Tahanite.

Exposition: Numbers 26:35 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'These are the sons of Ephraim after their families: of Shuthelah, the family of the Shuthalhites: of Becher, the family of the Bachrites: of Tahan, the family of the Tahanites.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 26:36

Hebrew

וְאֵלֶּה בְּנֵי שׁוּתָלַח לְעֵרָן מִשְׁפַּחַת הָעֵרָנִֽי׃

ve'eleh-veney-shvtalach-le'eran-mishefachat-ha'eraniy

KJV: And these are the sons of Shuthelah: of Eran, the family of the Eranites.

AKJV: And these are the sons of Shuthelah: of Eran, the family of the Eranites.

ASV: And these are the sons of Shuthelah: of Eran, the family of the Eranites.

YLT: And these are sons of Shuthelah: of Eran the family of the Eranite.

Exposition: Numbers 26:36 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And these are the sons of Shuthelah: of Eran, the family of the Eranites.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 26:37

Hebrew

אֵלֶּה מִשְׁפְּחֹת בְּנֵי־אֶפְרַיִם לִפְקֻדֵיהֶם שְׁנַיִם וּשְׁלֹשִׁים אֶלֶף וַחֲמֵשׁ מֵאוֹת אֵלֶּה בְנֵי־יוֹסֵף לְמִשְׁפְּחֹתָֽם׃

'eleh-mishefechot-veney-'eferayim-lifequdeyhem-shenayim-vsheloshiym-'elef-vachamesh-me'vot-'eleh-veney-yvosef-lemishefechotam

KJV: These are the families of the sons of Ephraim according to those that were numbered of them, thirty and two thousand and five hundred. These are the sons of Joseph after their families.

AKJV: These are the families of the sons of Ephraim according to those that were numbered of them, thirty and two thousand and five hundred. These are the sons of Joseph after their families. ¶

ASV: These are the families of the sons of Ephraim according to those that were numbered of them, thirty and two thousand and five hundred. These are the sons of Joseph after their families.

YLT: These are families of the sons of Ephraim, by their numbered ones, two and thirty thousand and five hundred. These are sons of Joseph by their families.

Exposition: Numbers 26:37 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'These are the families of the sons of Ephraim according to those that were numbered of them, thirty and two thousand and five hundred. These are the sons of Joseph after their families.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 26:38

Hebrew

בְּנֵי בִנְיָמִן לְמִשְׁפְּחֹתָם לְבֶלַע מִשְׁפַּחַת הַבַּלְעִי לְאַשְׁבֵּל מִשְׁפַּחַת הָֽאַשְׁבֵּלִי לַאֲחִירָם מִשְׁפַּחַת הָאֲחִירָמִֽי׃

veney-vineyamin-lemishefechotam-levela'-mishefachat-havale'iy-le'ashevel-mishefachat-ha'asheveliy-la'achiyram-mishefachat-ha'achiyramiy

KJV: The sons of Benjamin after their families: of Bela, the family of the Belaites: of Ashbel, the family of the Ashbelites: of Ahiram, the family of the Ahiramites:

AKJV: The sons of Benjamin after their families: of Bela, the family of the Belaites: of Ashbel, the family of the Ashbelites: of Ahiram, the family of the Ahiramites:

ASV: The sons of Benjamin after their families: of Bela, the family of the Belaites; of Ashbel, the family of the Ashbelites; of Ahiram, the family of the Ahiramites;

YLT: Sons of Benjamin by their families: of Bela is the family of the Belaite; of Ashbel the family of the Ashbelite; of Ahiram the family of the Ahiramite;

Exposition: Numbers 26:38 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'The sons of Benjamin after their families: of Bela, the family of the Belaites: of Ashbel, the family of the Ashbelites: of Ahiram, the family of the Ahiramites:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 26:39

Hebrew

לִשְׁפוּפָם מִשְׁפַּחַת הַשּׁוּפָמִי לְחוּפָם מִשְׁפַּחַת הַחוּפָמִֽי׃

lishefvfam-mishefachat-hashvfamiy-lechvfam-mishefachat-hachvfamiy

KJV: Of Shupham, the family of the Shuphamites: of Hupham, the family of the Huphamites.

AKJV: Of Shupham, the family of the Shuphamites: of Hupham, the family of the Huphamites.

ASV: of Shephupham, the family of the Shuphamites; of Hupham, the family of the Huphamites.

YLT: of Shupham the family of the Shuphamite; of Hupham the family of the Huphamite.

Exposition: Numbers 26:39 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Of Shupham, the family of the Shuphamites: of Hupham, the family of the Huphamites.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 26:40

Hebrew

וַיִּהְיוּ בְנֵי־בֶלַע אַרְדְּ וְנַעֲמָן מִשְׁפַּחַת הָֽאַרְדִּי לְנַֽעֲמָן מִשְׁפַּחַת הַֽנַּעֲמִֽי׃

vayiheyv-veney-vela'-'arede-vena'aman-mishefachat-ha'arediy-lena'aman-mishefachat-hana'amiy

KJV: And the sons of Bela were Ard and Naaman: of Ard, the family of the Ardites: and of Naaman, the family of the Naamites.

AKJV: And the sons of Bela were Ard and Naaman: of Ard, the family of the Ardites: and of Naaman, the family of the Naamites.

ASV: And the sons of Bela were Ard and Naaman: of Ard, the family of the Ardites; of Naaman, the family of the Naamites.

YLT: And sons of Bela are Ard and Naaman: of Ard is the family of the Ardite: of Naaman the family of the Naamite.

Exposition: Numbers 26:40 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And the sons of Bela were Ard and Naaman: of Ard, the family of the Ardites: and of Naaman, the family of the Naamites.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 26:41

Hebrew

אֵלֶּה בְנֵי־בִנְיָמִן לְמִשְׁפְּחֹתָם וּפְקֻדֵיהֶם חֲמִשָּׁה וְאַרְבָּעִים אֶלֶף וְשֵׁשׁ מֵאֽוֹת׃

'eleh-veney-vineyamin-lemishefechotam-vfequdeyhem-chamishah-ve'areva'iym-'elef-veshesh-me'vot

KJV: These are the sons of Benjamin after their families: and they that were numbered of them were forty and five thousand and six hundred.

AKJV: These are the sons of Benjamin after their families: and they that were numbered of them were forty and five thousand and six hundred. ¶

ASV: These are the sons of Benjamin after their families; and they that were numbered of them were forty and five thousand and six hundred.

YLT: These are sons of Benjamin by their families, and their numbered ones are five and forty thousand and six hundred.

Exposition: Numbers 26:41 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'These are the sons of Benjamin after their families: and they that were numbered of them were forty and five thousand and six hundred.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 26:42

Hebrew

אֵלֶּה בְנֵי־דָן לְמִשְׁפְּחֹתָם לְשׁוּחָם מִשְׁפַּחַת הַשּׁוּחָמִי אֵלֶּה מִשְׁפְּחֹת דָּן לְמִשְׁפְּחֹתָֽם׃

'eleh-veney-dan-lemishefechotam-leshvcham-mishefachat-hashvchamiy-'eleh-mishefechot-dan-lemishefechotam

KJV: These are the sons of Dan after their families: of Shuham, the family of the Shuhamites. These are the families of Dan after their families.

AKJV: These are the sons of Dan after their families: of Shuham, the family of the Shuhamites. These are the families of Dan after their families.

ASV: These are the sons of Dan after their families: of Shuham, the family of the Shuhamites. These are the families of Dan after their families.

YLT: These are sons of Dan by their families: of Shuham is the family of the Shuhamite; these are families of Dan by their families;

Exposition: Numbers 26:42 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'These are the sons of Dan after their families: of Shuham, the family of the Shuhamites. These are the families of Dan after their families.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 26:43

Hebrew

כָּל־מִשְׁפְּחֹת הַשּׁוּחָמִי לִפְקֻדֵיהֶם אַרְבָּעָה וְשִׁשִּׁים אֶלֶף וְאַרְבַּע מֵאֽוֹת׃

khal-mishefechot-hashvchamiy-lifequdeyhem-'areva'ah-veshishiym-'elef-ve'areva'-me'vot

KJV: All the families of the Shuhamites, according to those that were numbered of them, were threescore and four thousand and four hundred.

AKJV: All the families of the Shuhamites, according to those that were numbered of them, were three score and four thousand and four hundred. ¶

ASV: All the families of the Shuhamites, according to those that were numbered of them, were threescore and four thousand and four hundred.

YLT: all the families of the Shuhamite, by their numbered ones, are four and sixty thousand and four hundred.

Exposition: Numbers 26:43 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'All the families of the Shuhamites, according to those that were numbered of them, were threescore and four thousand and four hundred.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 26:44

Hebrew

בְּנֵי אָשֵׁר לְמִשְׁפְּחֹתָם לְיִמְנָה מִשְׁפַּחַת הַיִּמְנָה לְיִשְׁוִי מִשְׁפַּחַת הַיִּשְׁוִי לִבְרִיעָה מִשְׁפַּחַת הַבְּרִיעִֽי׃

veney-'asher-lemishefechotam-leyimenah-mishefachat-hayimenah-leyisheviy-mishefachat-hayisheviy-liveriy'ah-mishefachat-haveriy'iy

KJV: Of the children of Asher after their families: of Jimna, the family of the Jimnites: of Jesui, the family of the Jesuites: of Beriah, the family of the Beriites.

AKJV: Of the children of Asher after their families: of Jimna, the family of the Jimnites: of Jesui, the family of the Jesuites: of Beriah, the family of the Beriites.

ASV: The sons of Asher after their families: of Imnah, the family of the Imnites; of Ishvi, the family of the Ishvites; of Beriah, the family of the Berites.

YLT: Sons of Asher by their families: of Jimna is the family of the Jimnite; of Jesui the family of the Jesuite; of Beriah the family of the Beriite.

Exposition: Numbers 26:44 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Of the children of Asher after their families: of Jimna, the family of the Jimnites: of Jesui, the family of the Jesuites: of Beriah, the family of the Beriites.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 26:45

Hebrew

לִבְנֵי בְרִיעָה לְחֶבֶר מִשְׁפַּחַת הַֽחֶבְרִי לְמַלְכִּיאֵל מִשְׁפַּחַת הַמַּלְכִּיאֵלִֽי׃

liveney-veriy'ah-lechever-mishefachat-hacheveriy-lemalekhiy'el-mishefachat-hamalekhiy'eliy

KJV: Of the sons of Beriah: of Heber, the family of the Heberites: of Malchiel, the family of the Malchielites.

AKJV: Of the sons of Beriah: of Heber, the family of the Heberites: of Malchiel, the family of the Malchielites.

ASV: Of the sons of Beriah: of Heber, the family of the Heberites; of Malchiel, the family of the Malchielites.

YLT: Of sons of Beriah: of Heber is the family of the Heberite; of Malchiel the family of the Malchielite.

Exposition: Numbers 26:45 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Of the sons of Beriah: of Heber, the family of the Heberites: of Malchiel, the family of the Malchielites.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 26:46

Hebrew

וְשֵׁם בַּת־אָשֵׁר שָֽׂרַח׃

veshem-vat-'asher-sharach

KJV: And the name of the daughter of Asher was Sarah.

AKJV: And the name of the daughter of Asher was Sarah.

ASV: And the name of the daughter of Asher was Serah.

YLT: And the name of the daughter of Asher is Sarah.

Exposition: Numbers 26:46 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And the name of the daughter of Asher was Sarah.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 26:47

Hebrew

אֵלֶּה מִשְׁפְּחֹת בְּנֵי־אָשֵׁר לִפְקֻדֵיהֶם שְׁלֹשָׁה וַחֲמִשִּׁים אֶלֶף וְאַרְבַּע מֵאֽוֹת׃

'eleh-mishefechot-veney-'asher-lifequdeyhem-sheloshah-vachamishiym-'elef-ve'areva'-me'vot

KJV: These are the families of the sons of Asher according to those that were numbered of them; who were fifty and three thousand and four hundred.

AKJV: These are the families of the sons of Asher according to those that were numbered of them; who were fifty and three thousand and four hundred.

ASV: These are the families of the sons of Asher according to those that were numbered of them, fifty and three thousand and four hundred.

YLT: These are families of the sons of Asher, by their numbered ones, three and fifty thousand and four hundred.

Exposition: Numbers 26:47 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'These are the families of the sons of Asher according to those that were numbered of them; who were fifty and three thousand and four hundred.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 26:48

Hebrew

בְּנֵי נַפְתָּלִי לְמִשְׁפְּחֹתָם לְיַחְצְאֵל מִשְׁפַּחַת הַיַּחְצְאֵלִי לְגוּנִי מִשְׁפַּחַת הַגּוּנִֽי׃

veney-nafetaliy-lemishefechotam-leyachetze'el-mishefachat-hayachetze'eliy-legvniy-mishefachat-hagvniy

KJV: Of the sons of Naphtali after their families: of Jahzeel, the family of the Jahzeelites: of Guni, the family of the Gunites:

AKJV: Of the sons of Naphtali after their families: of Jahzeel, the family of the Jahzeelites: of Guni, the family of the Gunites:

ASV: The sons of Naphtali after their families: of Jahzeel, the family of the Jahzeelites; of Guni, the family of the Gunites;

YLT: Sons of Naphtali by their families: of Jahzeel is the family of the Jahzeelite; of Guni the family of the Gunite;

Exposition: Numbers 26:48 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Of the sons of Naphtali after their families: of Jahzeel, the family of the Jahzeelites: of Guni, the family of the Gunites:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 26:49

Hebrew

לְיֵצֶר מִשְׁפַּחַת הַיִּצְרִי לְשִׁלֵּם מִשְׁפַּחַת הַשִּׁלֵּמִֽי׃

leyetzer-mishefachat-hayitzeriy-leshilem-mishefachat-hashilemiy

KJV: Of Jezer, the family of the Jezerites: of Shillem, the family of the Shillemites.

AKJV: Of Jezer, the family of the Jezerites: of Shillem, the family of the Shillemites.

ASV: of Jezer, the family of the Jezerites; of Shillem, the family of the Shillemites.

YLT: of Jezer the family of the Jezerite; of Shillem the family of the Shillemite.

Exposition: Numbers 26:49 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Of Jezer, the family of the Jezerites: of Shillem, the family of the Shillemites.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 26:50

Hebrew

אֵלֶּה מִשְׁפְּחֹת נַפְתָּלִי לְמִשְׁפְּחֹתָם וּפְקֻדֵיהֶם חֲמִשָּׁה וְאַרְבָּעִים אֶלֶף וְאַרְבַּע מֵאֽוֹת׃

'eleh-mishefechot-nafetaliy-lemishefechotam-vfequdeyhem-chamishah-ve'areva'iym-'elef-ve'areva'-me'vot

KJV: These are the families of Naphtali according to their families: and they that were numbered of them were forty and five thousand and four hundred.

AKJV: These are the families of Naphtali according to their families: and they that were numbered of them were forty and five thousand and four hundred.

ASV: These are the families of Naphtali according to their families; and they that were numbered of them were forty and five thousand and four hundred.

YLT: These are families of Naphtali by their families, and their numbered ones are five and forty thousand and four hundred.

Exposition: Numbers 26:50 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'These are the families of Naphtali according to their families: and they that were numbered of them were forty and five thousand and four hundred.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 26:51

Hebrew

אֵלֶּה פְּקוּדֵי בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל שֵׁשׁ־מֵאוֹת אֶלֶף וָאָלֶף שְׁבַע מֵאוֹת וּשְׁלֹשִֽׁים׃

'eleh-feqvdey-veney-yishera'el-shesh-me'vot-'elef-va'alef-sheva'-me'vot-vsheloshiym

KJV: These were the numbered of the children of Israel, six hundred thousand and a thousand seven hundred and thirty.

AKJV: These were the numbered of the children of Israel, six hundred thousand and a thousand seven hundred and thirty. ¶

ASV: These are they that were numbered of the children of Israel, six hundred thousand and a thousand seven hundred and thirty.

YLT: These are numbered ones of the sons of Israel, six hundred thousand, and a thousand, seven hundred and thirty.

Exposition: Numbers 26:51 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'These were the numbered of the children of Israel, six hundred thousand and a thousand seven hundred and thirty.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 26:52

Hebrew

וַיְדַבֵּר יְהוָה אֶל־מֹשֶׁה לֵּאמֹֽר׃

vayedaver-yehvah-'el-mosheh-le'mor

KJV: And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying,

AKJV: And the LORD spoke to Moses, saying,

ASV: And Jehovah spake unto Moses, saying,

YLT: And Jehovah speaketh unto Moses, saying,

Exposition: Numbers 26:52 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 26:53

Hebrew

לָאֵלֶּה תֵּחָלֵק הָאָרֶץ בְּנַחֲלָה בְּמִסְפַּר שֵׁמֽוֹת׃

la'eleh-techaleq-ha'aretz-venachalah-vemisefar-shemvot

KJV: Unto these the land shall be divided for an inheritance according to the number of names.

AKJV: To these the land shall be divided for an inheritance according to the number of names.

ASV: Unto these the land shall be divided for an inheritance according to the number of names.

YLT: `To these is the land apportioned by inheritance, by the number of names;

Exposition: Numbers 26:53 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Unto these the land shall be divided for an inheritance according to the number of names.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 26:54

Hebrew

לָרַב תַּרְבֶּה נַחֲלָתוֹ וְלַמְעַט תַּמְעִיט נַחֲלָתוֹ אִישׁ לְפִי פְקֻדָיו יֻתַּן נַחֲלָתֽוֹ׃

larav-tareveh-nachalatvo-velame'at-tame'iyt-nachalatvo-'iysh-lefiy-fequdayv-yutan-nachalatvo

KJV: To many thou shalt give the more inheritance, and to few thou shalt give the less inheritance: to every one shall his inheritance be given according to those that were numbered of him.

AKJV: To many you shall give the more inheritance, and to few you shall give the less inheritance: to every one shall his inheritance be given according to those that were numbered of him.

ASV: To the more thou shalt give the more inheritance, and to the fewer thou shalt give the less inheritance: to every one according to those that were numbered of him shall his inheritance be given.

YLT: to the many thou dost increase their inheritance, and to the few thou dost diminish their inheritance; to each according to his numbered ones is given his inheritance.

Exposition: Numbers 26:54 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'To many thou shalt give the more inheritance, and to few thou shalt give the less inheritance: to every one shall his inheritance be given according to those that were numbered of him.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 26:55

Hebrew

אַךְ־בְּגוֹרָל יֵחָלֵק אֶת־הָאָרֶץ לִשְׁמוֹת מַטּוֹת־אֲבֹתָם יִנְחָֽלוּ׃

'akhe-vegvoral-yechaleq-'et-ha'aretz-lishemvot-matvot-'avotam-yinechalv

KJV: Notwithstanding the land shall be divided by lot: according to the names of the tribes of their fathers they shall inherit.

AKJV: Notwithstanding the land shall be divided by lot: according to the names of the tribes of their fathers they shall inherit.

ASV: Notwithstanding, the land shall be divided by lot: according to the names of the tribes of their fathers they shall inherit.

YLT: `Only by lot is the land apportioned, by the names of the tribes of their fathers they inherit;

Exposition: Numbers 26:55 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Notwithstanding the land shall be divided by lot: according to the names of the tribes of their fathers they shall inherit.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 26:56

Hebrew

עַל־פִּי הַגּוֹרָל תֵּחָלֵק נַחֲלָתוֹ בֵּין רַב לִמְעָֽט׃

'al-fiy-hagvoral-techaleq-nachalatvo-veyn-rav-lime'at

KJV: According to the lot shall the possession thereof be divided between many and few.

AKJV: According to the lot shall the possession thereof be divided between many and few. ¶

ASV: According to the lot shall their inheritance be divided between the more and the fewer.

YLT: according to the lot is their inheritance apportioned between many and few.'

Exposition: Numbers 26:56 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'According to the lot shall the possession thereof be divided between many and few.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 26:57

Hebrew

וְאֵלֶּה פְקוּדֵי הַלֵּוִי לְמִשְׁפְּחֹתָם לְגֵרְשׁוֹן מִשְׁפַּחַת הַגֵּרְשֻׁנִּי לִקְהָת מִשְׁפַּחַת הַקְּהָתִי לִמְרָרִי מִשְׁפַּחַת הַמְּרָרִֽי׃

ve'eleh-feqvdey-haleviy-lemishefechotam-legereshvon-mishefachat-hagereshuniy-liqehat-mishefachat-haqehatiy-limerariy-mishefachat-hamerariy

KJV: And these are they that were numbered of the Levites after their families: of Gershon, the family of the Gershonites: of Kohath, the family of the Kohathites: of Merari, the family of the Merarites.

AKJV: And these are they that were numbered of the Levites after their families: of Gershon, the family of the Gershonites: of Kohath, the family of the Kohathites: of Merari, the family of the Merarites.

ASV: And these are they that were numbered of the Levites after their families: of Gershon, the family of the Gershonites; of Kohath, the family of the Kohathites; of Merari, the family of the Merarites.

YLT: And these are numbered ones of the Levite by their families: of Gershon is the family of the Gershonite; of Kohath the family of the Kohathite; of Merari the family of the Merarite.

Exposition: Numbers 26:57 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And these are they that were numbered of the Levites after their families: of Gershon, the family of the Gershonites: of Kohath, the family of the Kohathites: of Merari, the family of the Merarites.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 26:58

Hebrew

אֵלֶּה ׀ מִשְׁפְּחֹת לֵוִי מִשְׁפַּחַת הַלִּבְנִי מִשְׁפַּחַת הַֽחֶבְרֹנִי מִשְׁפַּחַת הַמַּחְלִי מִשְׁפַּחַת הַמּוּשִׁי מִשְׁפַּחַת הַקָּרְחִי וּקְהָת הוֹלִד אֶת־עַמְרָֽם׃

'eleh- -mishefechot-leviy-mishefachat-haliveniy-mishefachat-hacheveroniy-mishefachat-hamacheliy-mishefachat-hamvshiy-mishefachat-haqarechiy-vqehat-hvolid-'et-'ameram

KJV: These are the families of the Levites: the family of the Libnites, the family of the Hebronites, the family of the Mahlites, the family of the Mushites, the family of the Korathites. And Kohath begat Amram.

AKJV: These are the families of the Levites: the family of the Libnites, the family of the Hebronites, the family of the Mahlites, the family of the Mushites, the family of the Korathites. And Kohath begat Amram.

ASV: These are the families of Levi: the family of the Libnites, the family of the Hebronites, the family of the Mahlites, the family of the Mushites, the family of the Korahites. And Kohath begat Amram.

YLT: These are families of the Levite: the family of the Libnite, the family of the Hebronite, the family of the Mahlite, the family of the Mushite, the family of the Korathite. And Kohath hath begotten Amram,

Exposition: Numbers 26:58 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'These are the families of the Levites: the family of the Libnites, the family of the Hebronites, the family of the Mahlites, the family of the Mushites, the family of the Korathites. And Kohath begat Amram.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 26:59

Hebrew

וְשֵׁם ׀ אֵשֶׁת עַמְרָם יוֹכֶבֶד בַּת־לֵוִי אֲשֶׁר יָלְדָה אֹתָהּ לְלֵוִי בְּמִצְרָיִם וַתֵּלֶד לְעַמְרָם אֶֽת־אַהֲרֹן וְאֶת־מֹשֶׁה וְאֵת מִרְיָם אֲחֹתָֽם׃

veshem- -'eshet-'ameram-yvokheved-vat-leviy-'asher-yaledah-'otah-leleviy-vemitzerayim-vateled-le'ameram-'et-'aharon-ve'et-mosheh-ve'et-mireyam-'achotam

KJV: And the name of Amram’s wife was Jochebed, the daughter of Levi, whom her mother bare to Levi in Egypt: and she bare unto Amram Aaron and Moses, and Miriam their sister.

AKJV: And the name of Amram’s wife was Jochebed, the daughter of Levi, whom her mother bore to Levi in Egypt: and she bore to Amram Aaron and Moses, and Miriam their sister.

ASV: And the name of Amram’s wife was Jochebed, the daughter of Levi, who was born to Levi in Egypt: and she bare unto Amram Aaron and Moses, and Miriam their sister.

YLT: and the name of Amram's wife is Jochebed, daughter of Levi, whom one hath born to Levi in Egypt; and she beareth to Amram Aaron, and Moses, and Miriam their sister.

Exposition: Numbers 26:59 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And the name of Amram’s wife was Jochebed, the daughter of Levi, whom her mother bare to Levi in Egypt: and she bare unto Amram Aaron and Moses, and Miriam their sister.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 26:60

Hebrew

וַיִוָּלֵד לְאַהֲרֹן אֶת־נָדָב וְאֶת־אֲבִיהוּא אֶת־אֶלְעָזָר וְאֶת־אִיתָמָֽר׃

vayivaled-le'aharon-'et-nadav-ve'et-'aviyhv'-'et-'ele'azar-ve'et-'iytamar

KJV: And unto Aaron was born Nadab, and Abihu, Eleazar, and Ithamar.

AKJV: And to Aaron was born Nadab, and Abihu, Eleazar, and Ithamar.

ASV: And unto Aaron were born Nadab and Abihu, Eleazar and Ithamar.

YLT: And born to Aaron Nadab and Abihu, Eleazar and Ithamar;

Exposition: Numbers 26:60 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And unto Aaron was born Nadab, and Abihu, Eleazar, and Ithamar.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 26:61

Hebrew

וַיָּמָת נָדָב וַאֲבִיהוּא בְּהַקְרִיבָם אֵשׁ־זָרָה לִפְנֵי יְהוָֽה׃

vayamat-nadav-va'aviyhv'-vehaqeriyvam-'esh-zarah-lifeney-yehvah

KJV: And Nadab and Abihu died, when they offered strange fire before the LORD.

AKJV: And Nadab and Abihu died, when they offered strange fire before the LORD.

ASV: And Nadab and Abihu died, when they offered strange fire before Jehovah.

YLT: and Nadab dieth--Abihu also--in their bringing near strange fire before Jehovah.

Exposition: Numbers 26:61 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Nadab and Abihu died, when they offered strange fire before the LORD.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 26:62

Hebrew

וַיִּהְיוּ פְקֻדֵיהֶם שְׁלֹשָׁה וְעֶשְׂרִים אֶלֶף כָּל־זָכָר מִבֶּן־חֹדֶשׁ וָמָעְלָה כִּי ׀ לֹא הָתְפָּקְדוּ בְּתוֹךְ בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל כִּי לֹא־נִתַּן לָהֶם נַחֲלָה בְּתוֹךְ בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵֽל׃

vayiheyv-fequdeyhem-sheloshah-ve'esheriym-'elef-khal-zakhar-miven-chodesh-vama'elah-khiy- -lo'-hatefaqedv-vetvokhe-veney-yishera'el-khiy-lo'-nitan-lahem-nachalah-vetvokhe-veney-yishera'el

KJV: And those that were numbered of them were twenty and three thousand, all males from a month old and upward: for they were not numbered among the children of Israel, because there was no inheritance given them among the children of Israel.

AKJV: And those that were numbered of them were twenty and three thousand, all males from a month old and upward: for they were not numbered among the children of Israel, because there was no inheritance given them among the children of Israel. ¶

ASV: And they that were numbered of them were twenty and three thousand, every male from a month old and upward: for they were not numbered among the children of Israel, because there was no inheritance given them among the children of Israel.

YLT: And their numbered ones are three and twenty thousand, every male from a son of a month and upwards, for they have not numbered themselves in the midst of the sons of Israel; for an inheritance hath not been given to them in the midst of the sons of Israel.

Exposition: Numbers 26:62 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And those that were numbered of them were twenty and three thousand, all males from a month old and upward: for they were not numbered among the children of Israel, because there was no inheritance given them among th...'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 26:63

Hebrew

אֵלֶּה פְּקוּדֵי מֹשֶׁה וְאֶלְעָזָר הַכֹּהֵן אֲשֶׁר פּֽ͏ָקְדוּ אֶת־בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל בְּעַֽרְבֹת מוֹאָב עַל יַרְדֵּן יְרֵחֽוֹ׃

'eleh-feqvdey-mosheh-ve'ele'azar-hakhohen-'asher-faqedv-'et-veney-yishera'el-ve'arevot-mvo'av-'al-yareden-yerechvo

KJV: These are they that were numbered by Moses and Eleazar the priest, who numbered the children of Israel in the plains of Moab by Jordan near Jericho.

AKJV: These are they that were numbered by Moses and Eleazar the priest, who numbered the children of Israel in the plains of Moab by Jordan near Jericho.

ASV: These are they that were numbered by Moses and Eleazar the priest, who numbered the children of Israel in the plains of Moab by the Jordan at Jericho.

YLT: These are those numbered by Moses and Eleazar the priest, who have numbered the sons of Israel in the plains of Moab, by Jordan, near Jericho;

Exposition: Numbers 26:63 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'These are they that were numbered by Moses and Eleazar the priest, who numbered the children of Israel in the plains of Moab by Jordan near Jericho.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 26:64

Hebrew

וּבְאֵלֶּה לֹא־הָיָה אִישׁ מִפְּקוּדֵי מֹשֶׁה וְאַהֲרֹן הַכֹּהֵן אֲשֶׁר פָּקְדוּ אֶת־בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל בְּמִדְבַּר סִינָֽי׃

vve'eleh-lo'-hayah-'iysh-mifeqvdey-mosheh-ve'aharon-hakhohen-'asher-faqedv-'et-veney-yishera'el-vemidevar-siynay

KJV: But among these there was not a man of them whom Moses and Aaron the priest numbered, when they numbered the children of Israel in the wilderness of Sinai.

AKJV: But among these there was not a man of them whom Moses and Aaron the priest numbered, when they numbered the children of Israel in the wilderness of Sinai.

ASV: But among these there was not a man of them that were numbered by Moses and Aaron the priest, who numbered the children of Israel in the wilderness of Sinai.

YLT: and among these there hath not been a man of those numbered by Moses, and Aaron the priest, who numbered the sons of Israel in the wilderness of Sinai,

Exposition: Numbers 26:64 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'But among these there was not a man of them whom Moses and Aaron the priest numbered, when they numbered the children of Israel in the wilderness of Sinai.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 26:65

Hebrew

כִּֽי־אָמַר יְהוָה לָהֶם מוֹת יָמֻתוּ בַּמִּדְבָּר וְלֹא־נוֹתַר מֵהֶם אִישׁ כִּי אִם־כָּלֵב בֶּן־יְפֻנֶּה וִיהוֹשֻׁעַ בִּן־נֽוּן׃

khiy-'amar-yehvah-lahem-mvot-yamutv-vamidevar-velo'-nvotar-mehem-'iysh-khiy-'im-khalev-ven-yefuneh-viyhvoshu'a-vin-nvn

KJV: For the LORD had said of them, They shall surely die in the wilderness. And there was not left a man of them, save Caleb the son of Jephunneh, and Joshua the son of Nun.

AKJV: For the LORD had said of them, They shall surely die in the wilderness. And there was not left a man of them, save Caleb the son of Jephunneh, and Joshua the son of Nun.

ASV: For Jehovah had said of them, They shall surely die in the wilderness. And there was not left a man of them, save Caleb the son of Jephunneh, and Joshua the son of Nun.

YLT: for Jehovah said of them, `They do certainly die in the wilderness;' and there hath not been left of them a man save Caleb son of Jephunneh, and Joshua son of Nun.

Exposition: Numbers 26:65 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'For the LORD had said of them, They shall surely die in the wilderness. And there was not left a man of them, save Caleb the son of Jephunneh, and Joshua the son of Nun.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.