Apologetics Bible

Numbers 7:1

Hebrew

וַיְהִי בְּיוֹם כַּלּוֹת מֹשֶׁה לְהָקִים אֶת־הַמִּשְׁכָּן וַיִּמְשַׁח אֹתוֹ וַיְקַדֵּשׁ אֹתוֹ וְאֶת־כָּל־כֵּלָיו וְאֶת־הַמִּזְבֵּחַ וְאֶת־כָּל־כֵּלָיו וַיִּמְשָׁחֵם וַיְקַדֵּשׁ אֹתָֽם׃

vayehiy-veyvom-khalvot-mosheh-lehaqiym-'et-hamishekhan-vayimeshach-'otvo-vayeqadesh-'otvo-ve'et-khal-khelayv-ve'et-hamizevecha-ve'et-khal-khelayv-vayimeshachem-vayeqadesh-'otam

KJV: And it came to pass on the day that Moses had fully set up the tabernacle, and had anointed it, and sanctified it, and all the instruments thereof, both the altar and all the vessels thereof, and had anointed them, and sanctified them;

AKJV: And it came to pass on the day that Moses had fully set up the tabernacle, and had anointed it, and sanctified it, and all the instruments thereof, both the altar and all the vessels thereof, and had anointed them, and sanctified them;

ASV: And it came to pass on the day that Moses had made an end of setting up the tabernacle, and had anointed it and sanctified it, and all the furniture thereof, and the altar and all the vessels thereof, and had anointed them and sanctified them;

YLT: And it cometh to pass on the day of Moses' finishing setting up the tabernacle, that he anointeth it, and sanctifieth it, and all its vessels, and the altar, and all its vessels, and he anointeth them, and sanctifieth them,

Exposition: Numbers 7:1 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And it came to pass on the day that Moses had fully set up the tabernacle, and had anointed it, and sanctified it, and all the instruments thereof, both the altar and all the vessels thereof, and had anointed them, an...'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:2

Hebrew

וַיַּקְרִיבוּ נְשִׂיאֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל רָאשֵׁי בֵּית אֲבֹתָם הֵם נְשִׂיאֵי הַמַּטֹּת הֵם הָעֹמְדִים עַל־הַפְּקֻדִֽים׃

vayaqeriyvv-neshiy'ey-yishera'el-ra'shey-veyt-'avotam-hem-neshiy'ey-hamatot-hem-ha'omediym-'al-hafequdiym

KJV: That the princes of Israel, heads of the house of their fathers, who were the princes of the tribes, and were over them that were numbered, offered:

AKJV: That the princes of Israel, heads of the house of their fathers, who were the princes of the tribes, and were over them that were numbered, offered:

ASV: that the princes of Israel, the heads of their fathers’ houses, offered. These were the princes of the tribes, these are they that were over them that were numbered:

YLT: and the princes of Israel (heads of the house of their fathers, they are princes of the tribes, they who are standing over those numbered) bring near,

Exposition: Numbers 7:2 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'That the princes of Israel, heads of the house of their fathers, who were the princes of the tribes, and were over them that were numbered, offered:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:3

Hebrew

וַיָּבִיאוּ אֶת־קָרְבָּנָם לִפְנֵי יְהוָה שֵׁשׁ־עֶגְלֹת צָב וּשְׁנֵי עָשָׂר בָּקָר עֲגָלָה עַל־שְׁנֵי הַנְּשִׂאִים וְשׁוֹר לְאֶחָד וַיַּקְרִיבוּ אוֹתָם לִפְנֵי הַמִּשְׁכָּֽן׃

vayaviy'v-'et-qarevanam-lifeney-yehvah-shesh-'egelot-tzav-vsheney-'ashar-vaqar-'agalah-'al-sheney-haneshi'iym-veshvor-le'echad-vayaqeriyvv-'votam-lifeney-hamishekhan

KJV: And they brought their offering before the LORD, six covered wagons, and twelve oxen; a wagon for two of the princes, and for each one an ox: and they brought them before the tabernacle.

AKJV: And they brought their offering before the LORD, six covered wagons, and twelve oxen; a wagon for two of the princes, and for each one an ox: and they brought them before the tabernacle.

ASV: and they brought their oblation before Jehovah, six covered wagons, and twelve oxen; a wagon for every two of the princes, and for each one an ox: and they presented them before the tabernacle.

YLT: yea, they bring their offering before Jehovah, six waggons covered, and twelve oxen--a waggon for two of the princes, and an ox for one--and they bring them near before the tabernacle.

Exposition: Numbers 7:3 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And they brought their offering before the LORD, six covered wagons, and twelve oxen; a wagon for two of the princes, and for each one an ox: and they brought them before the tabernacle.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:4

Hebrew

וַיֹּאמֶר יְהוָה אֶל־מֹשֶׁה לֵּאמֹֽר׃

vayo'mer-yehvah-'el-mosheh-le'mor

KJV: And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying,

AKJV: And the LORD spoke to Moses, saying,

ASV: And Jehovah spake unto Moses, saying,

YLT: And Jehovah speaketh unto Moses, saying,

Exposition: Numbers 7:4 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying,'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:5

Hebrew

קַח מֵֽאִתָּם וְהָיוּ לַעֲבֹד אֶת־עֲבֹדַת אֹהֶל מוֹעֵד וְנָתַתָּה אוֹתָם אֶל־הַלְוִיִּם אִישׁ כְּפִי עֲבֹדָתֽוֹ׃

qach-me'itam-vehayv-la'avod-'et-'avodat-'ohel-mvo'ed-venatatah-'votam-'el-haleviyim-'iysh-khefiy-'avodatvo

KJV: Take it of them, that they may be to do the service of the tabernacle of the congregation; and thou shalt give them unto the Levites, to every man according to his service.

AKJV: Take it of them, that they may be to do the service of the tabernacle of the congregation; and you shall give them to the Levites, to every man according to his service.

ASV: Take it of them, that they may be used in doing the service of the tent of meeting; and thou shalt give them unto the Levites, to every man according to his service.

YLT: `Receive from them, and they have been to do the service of the tent of meeting, and thou hast given them unto the Levites, each according to his service.'

Exposition: Numbers 7:5 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Take it of them, that they may be to do the service of the tabernacle of the congregation; and thou shalt give them unto the Levites, to every man according to his service.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:6

Hebrew

וַיִּקַּח מֹשֶׁה אֶת־הָעֲגָלֹת וְאֶת־הַבָּקָר וַיִּתֵּן אוֹתָם אֶל־הַלְוִיִּֽם׃

vayiqach-mosheh-'et-ha'agalot-ve'et-havaqar-vayiten-'votam-'el-haleviyim

KJV: And Moses took the wagons and the oxen, and gave them unto the Levites.

AKJV: And Moses took the wagons and the oxen, and gave them to the Levites.

ASV: And Moses took the wagons and the oxen, and gave them unto the Levites.

YLT: And Moses taketh the waggons and the oxen, and giveth them unto the Levites.

Exposition: Numbers 7:6 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And Moses took the wagons and the oxen, and gave them unto the Levites.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:7

Hebrew

אֵת ׀ שְׁתֵּי הָעֲגָלֹת וְאֵת אַרְבַּעַת הַבָּקָר נָתַן לִבְנֵי גֵרְשׁוֹן כְּפִי עֲבֹדָתָֽם׃

'et- -shetey-ha'agalot-ve'et-'areva'at-havaqar-natan-liveney-gereshvon-khefiy-'avodatam

KJV: Two wagons and four oxen he gave unto the sons of Gershon, according to their service:

AKJV: Two wagons and four oxen he gave to the sons of Gershon, according to their service:

ASV: Two wagons and four oxen he gave unto the sons of Gershon, according to their service:

YLT: The two of the waggons and the four of the oxen he hath given to the sons of Gershon, according to their service,

Exposition: Numbers 7:7 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Two wagons and four oxen he gave unto the sons of Gershon, according to their service:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:8

Hebrew

וְאֵת ׀ אַרְבַּע הָעֲגָלֹת וְאֵת שְׁמֹנַת הַבָּקָר נָתַן לִבְנֵי מְרָרִי כְּפִי עֲבֹדָתָם בְּיַד אִֽיתָמָר בֶּֽן־אַהֲרֹן הַכֹּהֵֽן׃

ve'et- -'areva'-ha'agalot-ve'et-shemonat-havaqar-natan-liveney-merariy-khefiy-'avodatam-veyad-'iytamar-ven-'aharon-hakhohen

KJV: And four wagons and eight oxen he gave unto the sons of Merari, according unto their service, under the hand of Ithamar the son of Aaron the priest.

AKJV: And four wagons and eight oxen he gave to the sons of Merari, according to their service, under the hand of Ithamar the son of Aaron the priest.

ASV: and four wagons and eight oxen he gave unto the sons of Merari, according unto their service, under the hand of Ithamar the son of Aaron the priest.

YLT: and the four of the waggons and the eight of the oxen he hath given to the sons of Merari, according to their service, by the hand of Ithamar son of Aaron the priest;

Exposition: Numbers 7:8 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And four wagons and eight oxen he gave unto the sons of Merari, according unto their service, under the hand of Ithamar the son of Aaron the priest.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:9

Hebrew

וְלִבְנֵי קְהָת לֹא נָתָן כִּֽי־עֲבֹדַת הַקֹּדֶשׁ עֲלֵהֶם בַּכָּתֵף יִשָּֽׂאוּ׃

veliveney-qehat-lo'-natan-khiy-'avodat-haqodesh-'alehem-vakhatef-yisha'v

KJV: But unto the sons of Kohath he gave none: because the service of the sanctuary belonging unto them was that they should bear upon their shoulders.

AKJV: But to the sons of Kohath he gave none: because the service of the sanctuary belonging to them was that they should bear on their shoulders. ¶

ASV: But unto the sons of Kohath he gave none, because the service of the sanctuary belonged unto them; they bare it upon their shoulders.

YLT: and to the sons of Kohath he hath not given, for the service of the sanctuary is on them: on the shoulder they bear.

Exposition: Numbers 7:9 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'But unto the sons of Kohath he gave none: because the service of the sanctuary belonging unto them was that they should bear upon their shoulders.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:10

Hebrew

וַיַּקְרִיבוּ הַנְּשִׂאִים אֵת חֲנֻכַּת הַמִּזְבֵּחַ בְּיוֹם הִמָּשַׁח אֹתוֹ וַיַּקְרִיבוּ הַנְּשִׂיאִם אֶת־קָרְבָּנָם לִפְנֵי הַמִּזְבֵּֽחַ׃

vayaqeriyvv-haneshi'iym-'et-chanukhat-hamizevecha-veyvom-himashach-'otvo-vayaqeriyvv-haneshiy'im-'et-qarevanam-lifeney-hamizevecha

KJV: And the princes offered for dedicating of the altar in the day that it was anointed, even the princes offered their offering before the altar.

AKJV: And the princes offered for dedicating of the altar in the day that it was anointed, even the princes offered their offering before the altar.

ASV: And the princes offered for the dedication of the altar in the day that it was anointed, even the princes offered their oblation before the altar.

YLT: And the princes bring near the dedication of the altar in the day of its being anointed; yea, the princes bring near their offering before the altar.

Exposition: Numbers 7:10 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And the princes offered for dedicating of the altar in the day that it was anointed, even the princes offered their offering before the altar.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:11

Hebrew

וַיֹּאמֶר יְהוָה אֶל־מֹשֶׁה נָשִׂיא אֶחָד לַיּוֹם נָשִׂיא אֶחָד לַיּוֹם יַקְרִיבוּ אֶת־קָרְבָּנָם לַחֲנֻכַּת הַמִּזְבֵּֽחַ׃

vayo'mer-yehvah-'el-mosheh-nashiy'-'echad-layvom-nashiy'-'echad-layvom-yaqeriyvv-'et-qarevanam-lachanukhat-hamizevecha

KJV: And the LORD said unto Moses, They shall offer their offering, each prince on his day, for the dedicating of the altar.

AKJV: And the LORD said to Moses, They shall offer their offering, each prince on his day, for the dedicating of the altar. ¶

ASV: And Jehovah said unto Moses, They shall offer their oblation, each prince on his day, for the dedication of the altar.

YLT: And Jehovah saith unto Moses, `One prince a day--one prince a day--do they bring near their offering for the dedication of the altar.'

Exposition: Numbers 7:11 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And the LORD said unto Moses, They shall offer their offering, each prince on his day, for the dedicating of the altar.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:12

Hebrew

וַיְהִי הַמַּקְרִיב בַּיּוֹם הָרִאשׁוֹן אֶת־קָרְבָּנוֹ נַחְשׁוֹן בֶּן־עַמִּינָדָב לְמַטֵּה יְהוּדָֽה׃

vayehiy-hamaqeriyv-vayvom-hari'shvon-'et-qarevanvo-nacheshvon-ven-'amiynadav-lemateh-yehvdah

KJV: And he that offered his offering the first day was Nahshon the son of Amminadab, of the tribe of Judah:

AKJV: And he that offered his offering the first day was Nahshon the son of Amminadab, of the tribe of Judah:

ASV: And he that offered his oblation the first day was Nahshon the son of Amminadab, of the tribe of Judah:

YLT: And he who is bringing near on the first day his offering is Nahshon son of Amminadab, of the tribe of Judah.

Exposition: Numbers 7:12 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And he that offered his offering the first day was Nahshon the son of Amminadab, of the tribe of Judah:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:13

Hebrew

וְקָרְבָּנוֹ קֽ͏ַעֲרַת־כֶּסֶף אַחַת שְׁלֹשִׁים וּמֵאָה מִשְׁקָלָהּ מִזְרָק אֶחָד כֶּסֶף שִׁבְעִים שֶׁקֶל בְּשֶׁקֶל הַקֹּדֶשׁ שְׁנֵיהֶם ׀ מְלֵאִים סֹלֶת בְּלוּלָה בַשֶּׁמֶן לְמִנְחָֽה׃

veqarevanvo-qa'arat-khesef-'achat-sheloshiym-vme'ah-misheqalah-mizeraq-'echad-khesef-shive'iym-sheqel-vesheqel-haqodesh-sheneyhem- -mele'iym-solet-velvlah-vashemen-leminechah

KJV: And his offering was one silver charger, the weight thereof was an hundred and thirty shekels, one silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them were full of fine flour mingled with oil for a meat offering:

AKJV: And his offering was one silver charger, the weight thereof was an hundred and thirty shekels, one silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them were full of fine flour mingled with oil for a meat offering:

ASV: and his oblation was one silver platter, the weight whereof was a hundred and thirty shekels, one silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a meal-offering;

YLT: And his offering is one silver dish, its weight a hundred and thirty shekels ; one silver bowl of seventy shekels, by the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of flour mixed with oil, for a present;

Exposition: Numbers 7:13 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And his offering was one silver charger, the weight thereof was an hundred and thirty shekels, one silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them were full of fine flour mingled with o...'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:14

Hebrew

כַּף אַחַת עֲשָׂרָה זָהָב מְלֵאָה קְטֹֽרֶת׃

khaf-'achat-'asharah-zahav-mele'ah-qetoret

KJV: One spoon of ten shekels of gold, full of incense:

AKJV: One spoon of ten shekels of gold, full of incense:

ASV: one golden spoon of ten shekels, full of incense;

YLT: one golden spoon of ten shekels , full of perfume;

Exposition: Numbers 7:14 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'One spoon of ten shekels of gold, full of incense:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:15

Hebrew

פַּר אֶחָד בֶּן־בָּקָר אַיִל אֶחָד כֶּֽבֶשׂ־אֶחָד בֶּן־שְׁנָתוֹ לְעֹלָֽה׃

far-'echad-ven-vaqar-'ayil-'echad-khevesh-'echad-ven-shenatvo-le'olah

KJV: One young bullock, one ram, one lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:

AKJV: One young bullock, one ram, one lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:

ASV: one young bullock, one ram, one he-lamb a year old, for a burnt-offering;

YLT: one bullock, a son of the herd, one ram, one lamb, a son of a year, for a burnt-offering;

Exposition: Numbers 7:15 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'One young bullock, one ram, one lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:16

Hebrew

שְׂעִיר־עִזִּים אֶחָד לְחַטָּֽאת׃

she'iyr-'iziym-'echad-lechata't

KJV: One kid of the goats for a sin offering:

AKJV: One kid of the goats for a sin offering:

ASV: one male of the goats for a sin-offering;

YLT: one kid of the goats for a sin-offering;

Exposition: Numbers 7:16 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'One kid of the goats for a sin offering:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:17

Hebrew

וּלְזֶבַח הַשְּׁלָמִים בָּקָר שְׁנַיִם אֵילִם חֲמִשָּׁה עַתּוּדִים חֲמִשָּׁה כְּבָשִׂים בְּנֵֽי־שָׁנָה חֲמִשָּׁה זֶה קָרְבַּן נַחְשׁוֹן בֶּן־עַמִּינָדָֽב׃

vlezevach-hashelamiym-vaqar-shenayim-'eylim-chamishah-'atvdiym-chamishah-khevashiym-veney-shanah-chamishah-zeh-qarevan-nacheshvon-ven-'amiynadav

KJV: And for a sacrifice of peace offerings, two oxen, five rams, five he goats, five lambs of the first year: this was the offering of Nahshon the son of Amminadab.

AKJV: And for a sacrifice of peace offerings, two oxen, five rams, five he goats, five lambs of the first year: this was the offering of Nahshon the son of Amminadab. ¶

ASV: and for the sacrifice of peace-offerings, two oxen, five rams, five he-goats, five he-lambs a year old: this was the oblation of Nahshon the son of Amminadab.

YLT: and for a sacrifice of the peace-offerings two oxen, five rams, five he-goats, five lambs, sons of a year; this is the offering of Nahshon son of Amminadab.

Exposition: Numbers 7:17 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And for a sacrifice of peace offerings, two oxen, five rams, five he goats, five lambs of the first year: this was the offering of Nahshon the son of Amminadab.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:18

Hebrew

בַּיּוֹם הַשֵּׁנִי הִקְרִיב נְתַנְאֵל בֶּן־צוּעָר נְשִׂיא יִשָּׂשכָֽר׃

vayvom-hasheniy-hiqeriyv-netane'el-ven-tzv'ar-neshiy'-yishashkhar

KJV: On the second day Nethaneel the son of Zuar, prince of Issachar, did offer:

AKJV: On the second day Nethaneel the son of Zuar, prince of Issachar, did offer:

ASV: On the second day Nethanel the son of Zuar, prince of Issachar, did offer:

YLT: On the second day hath Nethaneel son of Zuar, prince of Issachar, brought near.

Exposition: Numbers 7:18 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'On the second day Nethaneel the son of Zuar, prince of Issachar, did offer:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:19

Hebrew

הִקְרִב אֶת־קָרְבָּנוֹ קַֽעֲרַת־כֶּסֶף אַחַת שְׁלֹשִׁים וּמֵאָה מִשְׁקָלָהּ מִזְרָק אֶחָד כֶּסֶף שִׁבְעִים שֶׁקֶל בְּשֶׁקֶל הַקֹּדֶשׁ שְׁנֵיהֶם ׀ מְלֵאִים סֹלֶת בְּלוּלָה בַשֶּׁמֶן לְמִנְחָֽה׃

hiqeriv-'et-qarevanvo-qa'arat-khesef-'achat-sheloshiym-vme'ah-misheqalah-mizeraq-'echad-khesef-shive'iym-sheqel-vesheqel-haqodesh-sheneyhem- -mele'iym-solet-velvlah-vashemen-leminechah

KJV: He offered for his offering one silver charger, the weight whereof was an hundred and thirty shekels, one silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a meat offering:

AKJV: He offered for his offering one silver charger, the weight whereof was an hundred and thirty shekels, one silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a meat offering:

ASV: he offered for his oblation one silver platter, the weight whereof was a hundred and thirty shekels, one silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a meal-offering;

YLT: He hath brought near his offering, one silver dish, its weight a hundred and thirty shekels ; one silver bowl of seventy shekels, by the shekel of the sanctuary, both of them full of flour mixed with oil, for a present;

Exposition: Numbers 7:19 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'He offered for his offering one silver charger, the weight whereof was an hundred and thirty shekels, one silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with...'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:20

Hebrew

כַּף אַחַת עֲשָׂרָה זָהָב מְלֵאָה קְטֹֽרֶת׃

khaf-'achat-'asharah-zahav-mele'ah-qetoret

KJV: One spoon of gold of ten shekels, full of incense:

AKJV: One spoon of gold of ten shekels, full of incense:

ASV: one golden spoon of ten shekels, full of incense;

YLT: one golden spoon of ten shekels , full of perfume;

Exposition: Numbers 7:20 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'One spoon of gold of ten shekels, full of incense:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:21

Hebrew

פַּר אֶחָד בֶּן־בָּקָר אַיִל אֶחָד כֶּֽבֶשׂ־אֶחָד בֶּן־שְׁנָתוֹ לְעֹלָֽה׃

far-'echad-ven-vaqar-'ayil-'echad-khevesh-'echad-ven-shenatvo-le'olah

KJV: One young bullock, one ram, one lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:

AKJV: One young bullock, one ram, one lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:

ASV: one young bullock, one ram, one he-lamb a year old, for a burnt-offering;

YLT: one bullock, a son of the herd, one ram, one lamb, a son of a year, for a burnt-offering;

Exposition: Numbers 7:21 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'One young bullock, one ram, one lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:22

Hebrew

שְׂעִיר־עִזִּים אֶחָד לְחַטָּֽאת׃

she'iyr-'iziym-'echad-lechata't

KJV: One kid of the goats for a sin offering:

AKJV: One kid of the goats for a sin offering:

ASV: one male of the goats for a sin-offering;

YLT: one kid of the goats for a sin-offering;

Exposition: Numbers 7:22 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'One kid of the goats for a sin offering:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:23

Hebrew

וּלְזֶבַח הַשְּׁלָמִים בָּקָר שְׁנַיִם אֵילִם חֲמִשָּׁה עַתּוּדִים חֲמִשָּׁה כְּבָשִׂים בְּנֵי־שָׁנָה חֲמִשָּׁה זֶה קָרְבַּן נְתַנְאֵל בֶּן־צוּעָֽר׃

vlezevach-hashelamiym-vaqar-shenayim-'eylim-chamishah-'atvdiym-chamishah-khevashiym-veney-shanah-chamishah-zeh-qarevan-netane'el-ven-tzv'ar

KJV: And for a sacrifice of peace offerings, two oxen, five rams, five he goats, five lambs of the first year: this was the offering of Nethaneel the son of Zuar.

AKJV: And for a sacrifice of peace offerings, two oxen, five rams, five he goats, five lambs of the first year: this was the offering of Nethaneel the son of Zuar. ¶

ASV: and for the sacrifice of peace-offerings, two oxen, five rams, five he-goats, five he-lambs a year old: this was the oblation of Nethanel the son of Zuar.

YLT: and for a sacrifice of the peace-offerings two oxen, five rams, five he-goats, five lambs, sons of a year; this is the offering of Nethaneel son of Zuar.

Exposition: Numbers 7:23 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And for a sacrifice of peace offerings, two oxen, five rams, five he goats, five lambs of the first year: this was the offering of Nethaneel the son of Zuar.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:24

Hebrew

בַּיּוֹם הַשְּׁלִישִׁי נָשִׂיא לִבְנֵי זְבוּלֻן אֱלִיאָב בֶּן־חֵלֹֽן׃

vayvom-hasheliyshiy-nashiy'-liveney-zevvlun-'eliy'av-ven-chelon

KJV: On the third day Eliab the son of Helon, prince of the children of Zebulun, did offer:

AKJV: On the third day Eliab the son of Helon, prince of the children of Zebulun, did offer:

ASV: On the third day Eliab the son of Helon, prince of the children of Zebulun:

YLT: On the third day, the prince of the sons of Zebulun, Eliab son of Helon; --

Exposition: Numbers 7:24 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'On the third day Eliab the son of Helon, prince of the children of Zebulun, did offer:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:25

Hebrew

קָרְבָּנוֹ קַֽעֲרַת־כֶּסֶף אַחַת שְׁלֹשִׁים וּמֵאָה מִשְׁקָלָהּ מִזְרָק אֶחָד כֶּסֶף שִׁבְעִים שֶׁקֶל בְּשֶׁקֶל הַקֹּדֶשׁ שְׁנֵיהֶם ׀ מְלֵאִים סֹלֶת בְּלוּלָה בַשֶּׁמֶן לְמִנְחָֽה׃

qarevanvo-qa'arat-khesef-'achat-sheloshiym-vme'ah-misheqalah-mizeraq-'echad-khesef-shive'iym-sheqel-vesheqel-haqodesh-sheneyhem- -mele'iym-solet-velvlah-vashemen-leminechah

KJV: His offering was one silver charger, the weight whereof was an hundred and thirty shekels, one silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a meat offering:

AKJV: His offering was one silver charger, the weight whereof was an hundred and thirty shekels, one silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a meat offering:

ASV: his oblation was one silver platter, the weight whereof was a hundred and thirty shekels, one silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a meal-offering;

YLT: his offering is one silver dish, its weight a hundred and thirty shekels ; one silver bowl of seventy shekels, by the shekel of the sanctuary, both of them full of flour mixed with oil, for a present;

Exposition: Numbers 7:25 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'His offering was one silver charger, the weight whereof was an hundred and thirty shekels, one silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a...'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:26

Hebrew

כַּף אַחַת עֲשָׂרָה זָהָב מְלֵאָה קְטֹֽרֶת׃

khaf-'achat-'asharah-zahav-mele'ah-qetoret

KJV: One golden spoon of ten shekels, full of incense:

AKJV: One golden spoon of ten shekels, full of incense:

ASV: one golden spoon of ten shekels, full of incense;

YLT: one golden spoon of ten shekels , full of perfume;

Exposition: Numbers 7:26 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'One golden spoon of ten shekels, full of incense:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:27

Hebrew

פַּר אֶחָד בֶּן־בָּקָר אַיִל אֶחָד כֶּֽבֶשׂ־אֶחָד בֶּן־שְׁנָתוֹ לְעֹלָֽה׃

far-'echad-ven-vaqar-'ayil-'echad-khevesh-'echad-ven-shenatvo-le'olah

KJV: One young bullock, one ram, one lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:

AKJV: One young bullock, one ram, one lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:

ASV: one young bullock, one ram, one he-lamb a year old, for a burnt-offering;

YLT: one bullock, a son of the herd, one ram, one lamb, a son of a year, for a burnt-offering;

Exposition: Numbers 7:27 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'One young bullock, one ram, one lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:28

Hebrew

שְׂעִיר־עִזִּים אֶחָד לְחַטָּֽאת׃

she'iyr-'iziym-'echad-lechata't

KJV: One kid of the goats for a sin offering:

AKJV: One kid of the goats for a sin offering:

ASV: one male of the goats for a sin-offering;

YLT: one kid of the goats for a sin-offering;

Exposition: Numbers 7:28 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'One kid of the goats for a sin offering:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:29

Hebrew

וּלְזֶבַח הַשְּׁלָמִים בָּקָר שְׁנַיִם אֵילִם חֲמִשָּׁה עַתֻּדִים חֲמִשָּׁה כְּבָשִׂים בְּנֵי־שָׁנָה חֲמִשָּׁה זֶה קָרְבַּן אֱלִיאָב בֶּן־חֵלֹֽן׃

vlezevach-hashelamiym-vaqar-shenayim-'eylim-chamishah-'atudiym-chamishah-khevashiym-veney-shanah-chamishah-zeh-qarevan-'eliy'av-ven-chelon

KJV: And for a sacrifice of peace offerings, two oxen, five rams, five he goats, five lambs of the first year: this was the offering of Eliab the son of Helon.

AKJV: And for a sacrifice of peace offerings, two oxen, five rams, five he goats, five lambs of the first year: this was the offering of Eliab the son of Helon. ¶

ASV: and for the sacrifice of peace-offerings, two oxen, five rams, five he-goats, five he-lambs a year old: this was the oblation of Eliab the son of Helon.

YLT: and for a sacrifice of the peace-offerings two oxen, five rams, five he-goats, five lambs, sons of a year; this is the offering of Eliab son of Helon.

Exposition: Numbers 7:29 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And for a sacrifice of peace offerings, two oxen, five rams, five he goats, five lambs of the first year: this was the offering of Eliab the son of Helon.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:30

Hebrew

בַּיּוֹם הָרְבִיעִי נָשִׂיא לִבְנֵי רְאוּבֵן אֱלִיצוּר בֶּן־שְׁדֵיאֽוּר׃

vayvom-hareviy'iy-nashiy'-liveney-re'vven-'eliytzvr-ven-shedey'vr

KJV: On the fourth day Elizur the son of Shedeur, prince of the children of Reuben, did offer:

AKJV: On the fourth day Elizur the son of Shedeur, prince of the children of Reuben, did offer:

ASV: On the fourth day Elizur the son of Shedeur, prince of the children of Reuben:

YLT: On the fourth day, Elizur, son of Shedeur, prince of the sons of Reuben; --

Exposition: Numbers 7:30 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'On the fourth day Elizur the son of Shedeur, prince of the children of Reuben, did offer:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:31

Hebrew

קָרְבָּנוֹ קַֽעֲרַת־כֶּסֶף אַחַת שְׁלֹשִׁים וּמֵאָה מִשְׁקָלָהּ מִזְרָק אֶחָד כֶּסֶף שִׁבְעִים שֶׁקֶל בְּשֶׁקֶל הַקֹּדֶשׁ שְׁנֵיהֶם ׀ מְלֵאִים סֹלֶת בְּלוּלָה בַשֶּׁמֶן לְמִנְחָֽה׃

qarevanvo-qa'arat-khesef-'achat-sheloshiym-vme'ah-misheqalah-mizeraq-'echad-khesef-shive'iym-sheqel-vesheqel-haqodesh-sheneyhem- -mele'iym-solet-velvlah-vashemen-leminechah

KJV: His offering was one silver charger of the weight of an hundred and thirty shekels, one silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a meat offering:

AKJV: His offering was one silver charger of the weight of an hundred and thirty shekels, one silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a meat offering:

ASV: his oblation was one silver platter, the weight whereof was a hundred and thirty shekels, one silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a meal-offering;

YLT: his offering is one silver dish, its weight a hundred and thirty shekels ; one silver bowl of seventy shekels, by the shekel of the sanctuary, both of them full of flour mixed with oil, for a present;

Exposition: Numbers 7:31 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'His offering was one silver charger of the weight of an hundred and thirty shekels, one silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a meat of...'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:32

Hebrew

כַּף אַחַת עֲשָׂרָה זָהָב מְלֵאָה קְטֹֽרֶת

khaf-'achat-'asharah-zahav-mele'ah-qetoret

KJV: One golden spoon of ten shekels, full of incense:

AKJV: One golden spoon of ten shekels, full of incense:

ASV: one golden spoon of ten shekels, full of incense;

YLT: one golden spoon of ten shekels , full of perfume;

Exposition: Numbers 7:32 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'One golden spoon of ten shekels, full of incense:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:33

Hebrew

פַּר אֶחָד בֶּן־בָּקָר אַיִל אֶחָד כֶּֽבֶשׂ־אֶחָד בֶּן־שְׁנָתוֹ לְעֹלָֽה׃

far-'echad-ven-vaqar-'ayil-'echad-khevesh-'echad-ven-shenatvo-le'olah

KJV: One young bullock, one ram, one lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:

AKJV: One young bullock, one ram, one lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:

ASV: one young bullock, one ram, one he-lamb a year old, for a burnt-offering;

YLT: one bullock, a son of the herd, one ram, one lamb, a son of a year, for a burnt-offering;

Exposition: Numbers 7:33 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'One young bullock, one ram, one lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:34

Hebrew

שְׂעִיר־עִזִּים אֶחָד לְחַטָּֽאת׃

she'iyr-'iziym-'echad-lechata't

KJV: One kid of the goats for a sin offering:

AKJV: One kid of the goats for a sin offering:

ASV: one male of the goats for a sin-offering;

YLT: one kid of the goats for a sin-offering;

Exposition: Numbers 7:34 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'One kid of the goats for a sin offering:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:35

Hebrew

וּלְזֶבַח הַשְּׁלָמִים בָּקָר שְׁנַיִם אֵילִם חֲמִשָּׁה עַתֻּדִים חֲמִשָּׁה כְּבָשִׂים בְּנֵֽי־שָׁנָה חֲמִשָּׁה זֶה קָרְבַּן אֱלִיצוּר בֶּן־שְׁדֵיאֽוּר׃

vlezevach-hashelamiym-vaqar-shenayim-'eylim-chamishah-'atudiym-chamishah-khevashiym-veney-shanah-chamishah-zeh-qarevan-'eliytzvr-ven-shedey'vr

KJV: And for a sacrifice of peace offerings, two oxen, five rams, five he goats, five lambs of the first year: this was the offering of Elizur the son of Shedeur.

AKJV: And for a sacrifice of peace offerings, two oxen, five rams, five he goats, five lambs of the first year: this was the offering of Elizur the son of Shedeur. ¶

ASV: and for the sacrifice of peace-offerings, two oxen, five rams, five he-goats, five he-lambs a year old: this was the oblation of Elizur the son of Shedeur.

YLT: and for a sacrifice of the peace-offerings two oxen, five rams, five he-goats, five lambs, sons of a year; this is the offering of Elizur son of Shedeur.

Exposition: Numbers 7:35 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And for a sacrifice of peace offerings, two oxen, five rams, five he goats, five lambs of the first year: this was the offering of Elizur the son of Shedeur.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:36

Hebrew

בַּיּוֹם הַחֲמִישִׁי נָשִׂיא לִבְנֵי שִׁמְעוֹן שְׁלֻֽמִיאֵל בֶּן־צוּרִֽישַׁדָּֽי׃

vayvom-hachamiyshiy-nashiy'-liveney-shime'von-shelumiy'el-ven-tzvriyshaday

KJV: On the fifth day Shelumiel the son of Zurishaddai, prince of the children of Simeon, did offer:

AKJV: On the fifth day Shelumiel the son of Zurishaddai, prince of the children of Simeon, did offer:

ASV: On the fifth day Shelumiel the son of Zurishaddai, prince of the children of Simeon:

YLT: On the fifth day, the prince of the sons of Simeon, Shelumiel son of Zurishaddai; --

Exposition: Numbers 7:36 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'On the fifth day Shelumiel the son of Zurishaddai, prince of the children of Simeon, did offer:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:37

Hebrew

קָרְבָּנוֹ קַֽעֲרַת־כֶּסֶף אַחַת שְׁלֹשִׁים וּמֵאָה מִשְׁקָלָהּ מִזְרָק אֶחָד כֶּסֶף שִׁבְעִים שֶׁקֶל בְּשֶׁקֶל הַקֹּדֶשׁ שְׁנֵיהֶם ׀ מְלֵאִים סֹלֶת בְּלוּלָה בַשֶּׁמֶן לְמִנְחָֽה׃

qarevanvo-qa'arat-khesef-'achat-sheloshiym-vme'ah-misheqalah-mizeraq-'echad-khesef-shive'iym-sheqel-vesheqel-haqodesh-sheneyhem- -mele'iym-solet-velvlah-vashemen-leminechah

KJV: His offering was one silver charger, the weight whereof was an hundred and thirty shekels, one silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a meat offering:

AKJV: His offering was one silver charger, the weight whereof was an hundred and thirty shekels, one silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a meat offering:

ASV: his oblation was one silver platter, the weight whereof was a hundred and thirty shekels, one silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a meal-offering;

YLT: his offering is one silver dish, its weight a hundred and thirty shekels ; one silver bowl of seventy shekels, by the shekel of the sanctuary, both of them full of flour mixed with oil, for a present;

Exposition: Numbers 7:37 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'His offering was one silver charger, the weight whereof was an hundred and thirty shekels, one silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a...'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:38

Hebrew

כַּף אַחַת עֲשָׂרָה זָהָב מְלֵאָה קְטֹֽרֶת׃

khaf-'achat-'asharah-zahav-mele'ah-qetoret

KJV: One golden spoon of ten shekels, full of incense:

AKJV: One golden spoon of ten shekels, full of incense:

ASV: one golden spoon of ten shekels, full of incense;

YLT: one golden spoon of ten shekels , full of perfume;

Exposition: Numbers 7:38 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'One golden spoon of ten shekels, full of incense:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:39

Hebrew

פַּר אֶחָד בֶּן־בָּקָר אַיִל אֶחָד כֶּֽבֶשׂ־אֶחָד בֶּן־שְׁנָתוֹ לְעֹלָֽה׃

far-'echad-ven-vaqar-'ayil-'echad-khevesh-'echad-ven-shenatvo-le'olah

KJV: One young bullock, one ram, one lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:

AKJV: One young bullock, one ram, one lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:

ASV: one young bullock, one ram, one he-lamb a year old, for a burnt-offering;

YLT: one bullock, a son of the herd, one ram, one lamb, a son of a year, for a burnt-offering;

Exposition: Numbers 7:39 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'One young bullock, one ram, one lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:40

Hebrew

שְׂעִיר־עִזִּים אֶחָד לְחַטָּֽאת

she'iyr-'iziym-'echad-lechata't

KJV: One kid of the goats for a sin offering:

AKJV: One kid of the goats for a sin offering:

ASV: one male of the goats for a sin-offering;

YLT: one kid of the goats for a sin-offering;

Exposition: Numbers 7:40 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'One kid of the goats for a sin offering:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:41

Hebrew

וּלְזֶבַח הַשְּׁלָמִים בָּקָר שְׁנַיִם אֵילִם חֲמִשָּׁה עַתֻּדִים חֲמִשָּׁה כְּבָשִׂים בְּנֵי־שָׁנָה חֲמִשָּׁה זֶה קָרְבַּן שְׁלֻמִיאֵל בֶּן־צוּרִֽישַׁדָּֽי׃

vlezevach-hashelamiym-vaqar-shenayim-'eylim-chamishah-'atudiym-chamishah-khevashiym-veney-shanah-chamishah-zeh-qarevan-shelumiy'el-ven-tzvriyshaday

KJV: And for a sacrifice of peace offerings, two oxen, five rams, five he goats, five lambs of the first year: this was the offering of Shelumiel the son of Zurishaddai.

AKJV: And for a sacrifice of peace offerings, two oxen, five rams, five he goats, five lambs of the first year: this was the offering of Shelumiel the son of Zurishaddai. ¶

ASV: and for the sacrifice of peace-offerings, two oxen, five rams, five he-goats, five he-lambs a year old: this was the oblation of Shelumiel the son of Zurishaddai.

YLT: and for a sacrifice of the peace-offerings two oxen, five rams, five he-goats, five lambs, sons of a year; this is the offering of Shelumiel son of Zurishaddai.

Exposition: Numbers 7:41 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And for a sacrifice of peace offerings, two oxen, five rams, five he goats, five lambs of the first year: this was the offering of Shelumiel the son of Zurishaddai.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:42

Hebrew

בַּיּוֹם הַשִּׁשִּׁי נָשִׂיא לִבְנֵי גָד אֶלְיָסָף בֶּן־דְּעוּאֵֽל׃

vayvom-hashishiy-nashiy'-liveney-gad-'eleyasaf-ven-de'v'el

KJV: On the sixth day Eliasaph the son of Deuel, prince of the children of Gad, offered:

AKJV: On the sixth day Eliasaph the son of Deuel, prince of the children of Gad, offered:

ASV: On the sixth day Eliasaph the son of Deuel, prince of the children of Gad:

YLT: On the sixth day, the prince of the sons of Gad, Eliasaph son of Deuel; --

Exposition: Numbers 7:42 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'On the sixth day Eliasaph the son of Deuel, prince of the children of Gad, offered:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:43

Hebrew

קָרְבָּנוֹ קַֽעֲרַת־כֶּסֶף אַחַת שְׁלֹשִׁים וּמֵאָה מִשְׁקָלָהּ מִזְרָק אֶחָד כֶּסֶף שִׁבְעִים שֶׁקֶל בְּשֶׁקֶל הַקֹּדֶשׁ שְׁנֵיהֶם ׀ מְלֵאִים סֹלֶת בְּלוּלָה בַשֶּׁמֶן לְמִנְחָֽה׃

qarevanvo-qa'arat-khesef-'achat-sheloshiym-vme'ah-misheqalah-mizeraq-'echad-khesef-shive'iym-sheqel-vesheqel-haqodesh-sheneyhem- -mele'iym-solet-velvlah-vashemen-leminechah

KJV: His offering was one silver charger of the weight of an hundred and thirty shekels, a silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a meat offering:

AKJV: His offering was one silver charger of the weight of an hundred and thirty shekels, a silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a meat offering:

ASV: his oblation was one silver platter, the weight whereof was a hundred and thirty shekels, one silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a meal-offering;

YLT: his offering is one silver dish, its weight a hundred and thirty shekels ; one silver bowl of seventy shekels, by the shekel of the sanctuary, both of them full of flour mixed with oil, for a present;

Exposition: Numbers 7:43 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'His offering was one silver charger of the weight of an hundred and thirty shekels, a silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a meat offe...'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:44

Hebrew

כַּף אַחַת עֲשָׂרָה זָהָב מְלֵאָה קְטֹֽרֶת׃

khaf-'achat-'asharah-zahav-mele'ah-qetoret

KJV: One golden spoon of ten shekels, full of incense:

AKJV: One golden spoon of ten shekels, full of incense:

ASV: one golden spoon of ten shekels, full of incense;

YLT: one golden spoon of ten shekels , full of perfume;

Exposition: Numbers 7:44 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'One golden spoon of ten shekels, full of incense:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:45

Hebrew

פַּר אֶחָד בֶּן־בָּקָר אַיִל אֶחָד כֶּֽבֶשׂ־אֶחָד בֶּן־שְׁנָתוֹ לְעֹלָֽה׃

far-'echad-ven-vaqar-'ayil-'echad-khevesh-'echad-ven-shenatvo-le'olah

KJV: One young bullock, one ram, one lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:

AKJV: One young bullock, one ram, one lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:

ASV: one young bullock, one ram, one he-lamb a year old, for a burnt-offering;

YLT: one bullock, a son of the herd, one ram, one lamb, a son of a year, for a burnt-offering;

Exposition: Numbers 7:45 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'One young bullock, one ram, one lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:46

Hebrew

שְׂעִיר־עִזִּים אֶחָד לְחַטָּֽאת׃

she'iyr-'iziym-'echad-lechata't

KJV: One kid of the goats for a sin offering:

AKJV: One kid of the goats for a sin offering:

ASV: one male of the goats for a sin-offering;

YLT: one kid of the goats for a sin-offering;

Exposition: Numbers 7:46 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'One kid of the goats for a sin offering:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:47

Hebrew

וּלְזֶבַח הַשְּׁלָמִים בָּקָר שְׁנַיִם אֵילִם חֲמִשָּׁה עַתֻּדִים חֲמִשָּׁה כְּבָשִׂים בְּנֵי־שָׁנָה חֲמִשָּׁה זֶה קָרְבַּן אֶלְיָסָף בֶּן־דְּעוּאֵֽל׃

vlezevach-hashelamiym-vaqar-shenayim-'eylim-chamishah-'atudiym-chamishah-khevashiym-veney-shanah-chamishah-zeh-qarevan-'eleyasaf-ven-de'v'el

KJV: And for a sacrifice of peace offerings, two oxen, five rams, five he goats, five lambs of the first year: this was the offering of Eliasaph the son of Deuel.

AKJV: And for a sacrifice of peace offerings, two oxen, five rams, five he goats, five lambs of the first year: this was the offering of Eliasaph the son of Deuel. ¶

ASV: and for the sacrifice of peace-offerings, two oxen, five rams, five he-goats, five he-lambs a year old: this was the oblation of Eliasaph the son of Deuel.

YLT: and for a sacrifice of the peace-offerings two oxen, five rams, five he-goats, five lambs, sons of a year; this is the offering of Eliasaph son of Deuel.

Exposition: Numbers 7:47 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And for a sacrifice of peace offerings, two oxen, five rams, five he goats, five lambs of the first year: this was the offering of Eliasaph the son of Deuel.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:48

Hebrew

בַּיּוֹם הַשְּׁבִיעִי נָשִׂיא לִבְנֵי אֶפְרָיִם אֱלִֽישָׁמָע בֶּן־עַמִּיהֽוּד׃

vayvom-hasheviy'iy-nashiy'-liveney-'eferayim-'eliyshama'-ven-'amiyhvd

KJV: On the seventh day Elishama the son of Ammihud, prince of the children of Ephraim, offered:

AKJV: On the seventh day Elishama the son of Ammihud, prince of the children of Ephraim, offered:

ASV: On the seventh day Elishama the son of Ammihud, prince of the children of Ephraim:

YLT: On the seventh day, the prince of the sons of Ephraim, Elishama son of Ammihud; --

Exposition: Numbers 7:48 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'On the seventh day Elishama the son of Ammihud, prince of the children of Ephraim, offered:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:49

Hebrew

קָרְבָּנוֹ קַֽעֲרַת־כֶּסֶף אַחַת שְׁלֹשִׁים וּמֵאָה מִשְׁקָלָהּ מִזְרָק אֶחָד כֶּסֶף שִׁבְעִים שֶׁקֶל בְּשֶׁקֶל הַקֹּדֶשׁ שְׁנֵיהֶם ׀ מְלֵאִים סֹלֶת בְּלוּלָה בַשֶּׁמֶן לְמִנְחָֽה׃

qarevanvo-qa'arat-khesef-'achat-sheloshiym-vme'ah-misheqalah-mizeraq-'echad-khesef-shive'iym-sheqel-vesheqel-haqodesh-sheneyhem- -mele'iym-solet-velvlah-vashemen-leminechah

KJV: His offering was one silver charger, the weight whereof was an hundred and thirty shekels, one silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a meat offering:

AKJV: His offering was one silver charger, the weight whereof was an hundred and thirty shekels, one silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a meat offering:

ASV: his oblation was one silver platter, the weight whereof was a hundred and thirty shekels, one silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a meal-offering;

YLT: his offering is one silver dish, its weight a hundred and thirty shekels ; one silver bowl of seventy shekels, by the shekel of the sanctuary, both of them full of flour mixed with oil, for a present;

Exposition: Numbers 7:49 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'His offering was one silver charger, the weight whereof was an hundred and thirty shekels, one silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a...'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:50

Hebrew

כַּף אַחַת עֲשָׂרָה זָהָב מְלֵאָה קְטֹֽרֶת׃

khaf-'achat-'asharah-zahav-mele'ah-qetoret

KJV: One golden spoon of ten shekels, full of incense:

AKJV: One golden spoon of ten shekels, full of incense:

ASV: one golden spoon of ten shekels, full of incense;

YLT: one golden spoon of ten shekels , full of perfume;

Exposition: Numbers 7:50 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'One golden spoon of ten shekels, full of incense:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:51

Hebrew

פַּר אֶחָד בֶּן־בָּקָר אַיִל אֶחָד כֶּֽבֶשׂ־אֶחָד בֶּן־שְׁנָתוֹ לְעֹלָֽה׃

far-'echad-ven-vaqar-'ayil-'echad-khevesh-'echad-ven-shenatvo-le'olah

KJV: One young bullock, one ram, one lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:

AKJV: One young bullock, one ram, one lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:

ASV: one young bullock, one ram, one he-lamb a year old, for a burnt-offering;

YLT: one bullock, a son of the herd, one ram, one lamb, a son of a year, for a burnt-offering;

Exposition: Numbers 7:51 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'One young bullock, one ram, one lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:52

Hebrew

שְׂעִיר־עִזִּים אֶחָד לְחַטָּֽאת׃

she'iyr-'iziym-'echad-lechata't

KJV: One kid of the goats for a sin offering:

AKJV: One kid of the goats for a sin offering:

ASV: one male of the goats for a sin-offering;

YLT: one kid of the goats for a sin-offering;

Exposition: Numbers 7:52 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'One kid of the goats for a sin offering:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:53

Hebrew

וּלְזֶבַח הַשְּׁלָמִים בָּקָר שְׁנַיִם אֵילִם חֲמִשָּׁה עַתֻּדִים חֲמִשָּׁה כְּבָשִׂים בְּנֵֽי־שָׁנָה חֲמִשָּׁה זֶה קָרְבַּן אֱלִישָׁמָע בֶּן־עַמִּיהֽוּד׃

vlezevach-hashelamiym-vaqar-shenayim-'eylim-chamishah-'atudiym-chamishah-khevashiym-veney-shanah-chamishah-zeh-qarevan-'eliyshama'-ven-'amiyhvd

KJV: And for a sacrifice of peace offerings, two oxen, five rams, five he goats, five lambs of the first year: this was the offering of Elishama the son of Ammihud.

AKJV: And for a sacrifice of peace offerings, two oxen, five rams, five he goats, five lambs of the first year: this was the offering of Elishama the son of Ammihud. ¶

ASV: and for the sacrifice of peace-offerings, two oxen, five rams, five he-goats, five he-lambs a year old: this was the oblation of Elishama the son of Ammihud.

YLT: and for a sacrifice of the peace-offerings two oxen, five rams, five he-goats, five lambs, sons of a year; this is the offering of Elishama son of Ammihud.

Exposition: Numbers 7:53 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And for a sacrifice of peace offerings, two oxen, five rams, five he goats, five lambs of the first year: this was the offering of Elishama the son of Ammihud.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:54

Hebrew

בַּיּוֹם הַשְּׁמִינִי נָשִׂיא לִבְנֵי מְנַשֶּׁה גַּמְלִיאֵל בֶּן־פְּדָה־צֽוּר׃

vayvom-hashemiyniy-nashiy'-liveney-menasheh-gameliy'el-ven-fedah-tzvr

KJV: On the eighth day offered Gamaliel the son of Pedahzur, prince of the children of Manasseh:

AKJV: On the eighth day offered Gamaliel the son of Pedahzur, prince of the children of Manasseh:

ASV: On the eighth day Gamaliel the son of Pedahzur, prince of the children of Manasseh:

YLT: On the eighth day, the prince of the sons of Manasseh, Gamaliel son of Pedahzur; --

Exposition: Numbers 7:54 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'On the eighth day offered Gamaliel the son of Pedahzur, prince of the children of Manasseh:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:55

Hebrew

קָרְבָּנוֹ קַֽעֲרַת־כֶּסֶף אַחַת שְׁלֹשִׁים וּמֵאָה מִשְׁקָלָהּ מִזְרָק אֶחָד כֶּסֶף שִׁבְעִים שֶׁקֶל בְּשֶׁקֶל הַקֹּדֶשׁ שְׁנֵיהֶם ׀ מְלֵאִים סֹלֶת בְּלוּלָה בַשֶּׁמֶן לְמִנְחָֽה

qarevanvo-qa'arat-khesef-'achat-sheloshiym-vme'ah-misheqalah-mizeraq-'echad-khesef-shive'iym-sheqel-vesheqel-haqodesh-sheneyhem- -mele'iym-solet-velvlah-vashemen-leminechah

KJV: His offering was one silver charger of the weight of an hundred and thirty shekels, one silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a meat offering:

AKJV: His offering was one silver charger of the weight of an hundred and thirty shekels, one silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a meat offering:

ASV: his oblation was one silver platter, the weight whereof was a hundred and thirty shekels, one silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a meal-offering;

YLT: his offering is one silver dish, its weight a hundred and thirty shekels ; one silver bowl of seventy shekels, by the shekel of the sanctuary, both of them full of flour mixed with oil, for a present;

Exposition: Numbers 7:55 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'His offering was one silver charger of the weight of an hundred and thirty shekels, one silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a meat of...'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:56

Hebrew

כַּף אַחַת עֲשָׂרָה זָהָב מְלֵאָה קְטֹֽרֶת׃

khaf-'achat-'asharah-zahav-mele'ah-qetoret

KJV: One golden spoon of ten shekels, full of incense:

AKJV: One golden spoon of ten shekels, full of incense:

ASV: one golden spoon of ten shekels, full of incense;

YLT: one golden spoon of ten shekels , full of perfume;

Exposition: Numbers 7:56 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'One golden spoon of ten shekels, full of incense:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:57

Hebrew

פַּר אֶחָד בֶּן־בָּקָר אַיִל אֶחָד כֶּֽבֶשׂ־אֶחָד בֶּן־שְׁנָתוֹ לְעֹלָֽה׃

far-'echad-ven-vaqar-'ayil-'echad-khevesh-'echad-ven-shenatvo-le'olah

KJV: One young bullock, one ram, one lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:

AKJV: One young bullock, one ram, one lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:

ASV: one young bullock, one ram, one he-lamb a year old, for a burnt-offering;

YLT: one bullock, a son of the herd, one ram, one lamb, a son of a year, for a burnt-offering;

Exposition: Numbers 7:57 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'One young bullock, one ram, one lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:58

Hebrew

שְׂעִיר־עִזִּים אֶחָד לְחַטָּֽאת׃

she'iyr-'iziym-'echad-lechata't

KJV: One kid of the goats for a sin offering:

AKJV: One kid of the goats for a sin offering:

ASV: one male of the goats for a sin-offering;

YLT: one kid of the goats for a sin-offering;

Exposition: Numbers 7:58 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'One kid of the goats for a sin offering:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:59

Hebrew

וּלְזֶבַח הַשְּׁלָמִים בָּקָר שְׁנַיִם אֵילִם חֲמִשָּׁה עַתֻּדִים חֲמִשָּׁה כְּבָשִׂים בְּנֵי־שָׁנָה חֲמִשָּׁה זֶה קָרְבַּן גַּמְלִיאֵל בֶּן־פְּדָה צֽוּר׃

vlezevach-hashelamiym-vaqar-shenayim-'eylim-chamishah-'atudiym-chamishah-khevashiym-veney-shanah-chamishah-zeh-qarevan-gameliy'el-ven-fedah-tzvr

KJV: And for a sacrifice of peace offerings, two oxen, five rams, five he goats, five lambs of the first year: this was the offering of Gamaliel the son of Pedahzur.

AKJV: And for a sacrifice of peace offerings, two oxen, five rams, five he goats, five lambs of the first year: this was the offering of Gamaliel the son of Pedahzur. ¶

ASV: and for the sacrifice of peace-offerings, two oxen, five rams, five he-goats, five he-lambs a year old: this was the oblation of Gamaliel the son of Pedahzur.

YLT: and for a sacrifice of the peace-offerings two oxen, five rams, five he-goats, five lambs, sons of a year; this is the offering of Gamaliel son of Pedahzur.

Exposition: Numbers 7:59 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And for a sacrifice of peace offerings, two oxen, five rams, five he goats, five lambs of the first year: this was the offering of Gamaliel the son of Pedahzur.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:60

Hebrew

בַּיּוֹם הַתְּשִׁיעִי נָשִׂיא לִבְנֵי בִנְיָמ͏ִן אֲבִידָן בֶּן־גִּדְעֹנִֽי׃

vayvom-hateshiy'iy-nashiy'-liveney-vineyamin-'aviydan-ven-gide'oniy

KJV: On the ninth day Abidan the son of Gideoni, prince of the children of Benjamin, offered:

AKJV: On the ninth day Abidan the son of Gideoni, prince of the children of Benjamin, offered:

ASV: On the ninth day Abidan the son of Gideoni, prince of the children of Benjamin:

YLT: On the ninth day, the prince of the sons of Benjamin, Abidan son of Gideoni; --

Exposition: Numbers 7:60 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'On the ninth day Abidan the son of Gideoni, prince of the children of Benjamin, offered:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:61

Hebrew

קָרְבָּנוֹ קַֽעֲרַת־כֶּסֶף אַחַת שְׁלֹשִׁים וּמֵאָה מִשְׁקָלָהּ מִזְרָק אֶחָד כֶּסֶף שִׁבְעִים שֶׁקֶל בְּשֶׁקֶל הַקֹּדֶשׁ שְׁנֵיהֶם ׀ מְלֵאִים סֹלֶת בְּלוּלָה בַשֶּׁמֶן לְמִנְחָֽה׃

qarevanvo-qa'arat-khesef-'achat-sheloshiym-vme'ah-misheqalah-mizeraq-'echad-khesef-shive'iym-sheqel-vesheqel-haqodesh-sheneyhem- -mele'iym-solet-velvlah-vashemen-leminechah

KJV: His offering was one silver charger, the weight whereof was an hundred and thirty shekels, one silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a meat offering:

AKJV: His offering was one silver charger, the weight whereof was an hundred and thirty shekels, one silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a meat offering:

ASV: his oblation was one silver platter, the weight whereof was a hundred and thirty shekels, one silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a meal-offering;

YLT: his offering is one silver dish, its weight a hundred and thirty shekels ; one silver bowl of seventy shekels, by the shekel of the sanctuary, both of them full of flour mixed with oil, for a present;

Exposition: Numbers 7:61 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'His offering was one silver charger, the weight whereof was an hundred and thirty shekels, one silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a...'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:62

Hebrew

כַּף אַחַת עֲשָׂרָה זָהָב מְלֵאָה קְטֹֽרֶת׃

khaf-'achat-'asharah-zahav-mele'ah-qetoret

KJV: One golden spoon of ten shekels, full of incense:

AKJV: One golden spoon of ten shekels, full of incense:

ASV: one golden spoon of ten shekels, full of incense;

YLT: one golden spoon of ten shekels , full of perfume;

Exposition: Numbers 7:62 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'One golden spoon of ten shekels, full of incense:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:63

Hebrew

פַּר אֶחָד בֶּן־בָּקָר אַיִל אֶחָד כֶּֽבֶשׂ־אֶחָד בֶּן־שְׁנָתוֹ לְעֹלָֽה׃

far-'echad-ven-vaqar-'ayil-'echad-khevesh-'echad-ven-shenatvo-le'olah

KJV: One young bullock, one ram, one lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:

AKJV: One young bullock, one ram, one lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:

ASV: one young bullock, one ram, one he-lamb a year old, for a burnt-offering;

YLT: one bullock, a son of the herd, one ram, one lamb, a son of a year, for a burnt-offering;

Exposition: Numbers 7:63 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'One young bullock, one ram, one lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:64

Hebrew

שְׂעִיר־עִזִּים אֶחָד לְחַטָּֽאת׃

she'iyr-'iziym-'echad-lechata't

KJV: One kid of the goats for a sin offering:

AKJV: One kid of the goats for a sin offering:

ASV: one male of the goats for a sin-offering;

YLT: one kid of the goats for a sin-offering:

Exposition: Numbers 7:64 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'One kid of the goats for a sin offering:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:65

Hebrew

וּלְזֶבַח הַשְּׁלָמִים בָּקָר שְׁנַיִם אֵילִם חֲמִשָּׁה עַתֻּדִים חֲמִשָּׁה כְּבָשִׂים בְּנֵי־שָׁנָה חֲמִשָּׁה זֶה קָרְבַּן אֲבִידָן בֶּן־גִּדְעֹנִֽי׃

vlezevach-hashelamiym-vaqar-shenayim-'eylim-chamishah-'atudiym-chamishah-khevashiym-veney-shanah-chamishah-zeh-qarevan-'aviydan-ven-gide'oniy

KJV: And for a sacrifice of peace offerings, two oxen, five rams, five he goats, five lambs of the first year: this was the offering of Abidan the son of Gideoni.

AKJV: And for a sacrifice of peace offerings, two oxen, five rams, five he goats, five lambs of the first year: this was the offering of Abidan the son of Gideoni. ¶

ASV: and for the sacrifice of peace-offerings, two oxen, five rams, five he-goats, five he-lambs a year old: this was the oblation of Abidan the son of Gideoni.

YLT: and for a sacrifice of the peace-offerings two oxen, five rams, five he-goats, five lambs, sons of a year; this is the offering of Abidan son of Gideoni.

Exposition: Numbers 7:65 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And for a sacrifice of peace offerings, two oxen, five rams, five he goats, five lambs of the first year: this was the offering of Abidan the son of Gideoni.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:66

Hebrew

בַּיּוֹם הָעֲשִׂירִי נָשִׂיא לִבְנֵי דָן אֲחִיעֶזֶר בֶּן־עַמִּישַׁדָּֽי׃

vayvom-ha'ashiyriy-nashiy'-liveney-dan-'achiy'ezer-ven-'amiyshaday

KJV: On the tenth day Ahiezer the son of Ammishaddai, prince of the children of Dan, offered:

AKJV: On the tenth day Ahiezer the son of Ammishaddai, prince of the children of Dan, offered:

ASV: On the tenth day Ahiezer the son of Ammishaddai, prince of the children of Dan:

YLT: On the tenth day, the prince of the sons of Dan, Ahiezer son of Ammishaddai; --

Exposition: Numbers 7:66 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'On the tenth day Ahiezer the son of Ammishaddai, prince of the children of Dan, offered:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:67

Hebrew

קָרְבָּנוֹ קַֽעֲרַת־כֶּסֶף אַחַת שְׁלֹשִׁים וּמֵאָה מִשְׁקָלָהּ מִזְרָק אֶחָד כֶּסֶף שִׁבְעִים שֶׁקֶל בְּשֶׁקֶל הַקֹּדֶשׁ שְׁנֵיהֶם ׀ מְלֵאִים סֹלֶת בְּלוּלָה בַשֶּׁמֶן לְמִנְחָֽה׃

qarevanvo-qa'arat-khesef-'achat-sheloshiym-vme'ah-misheqalah-mizeraq-'echad-khesef-shive'iym-sheqel-vesheqel-haqodesh-sheneyhem- -mele'iym-solet-velvlah-vashemen-leminechah

KJV: His offering was one silver charger, the weight whereof was an hundred and thirty shekels, one silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a meat offering:

AKJV: His offering was one silver charger, the weight whereof was an hundred and thirty shekels, one silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a meat offering:

ASV: his oblation was one silver platter, the weight whereof was a hundred and thirty shekels, one silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a meal-offering;

YLT: his offering is one silver dish, its weight a hundred and thirty shekels ; one silver bowl of seventy shekels, by the shekel of the sanctuary, both of them full of flour mixed with oil, for a present;

Exposition: Numbers 7:67 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'His offering was one silver charger, the weight whereof was an hundred and thirty shekels, one silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a...'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:68

Hebrew

כַּף אַחַת עֲשָׂרָה זָהָב מְלֵאָה קְטֹֽרֶת

khaf-'achat-'asharah-zahav-mele'ah-qetoret

KJV: One golden spoon of ten shekels, full of incense:

AKJV: One golden spoon of ten shekels, full of incense:

ASV: one golden spoon of ten shekels, full of incense;

YLT: one golden spoon of ten shekels , full of perfume;

Exposition: Numbers 7:68 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'One golden spoon of ten shekels, full of incense:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:69

Hebrew

פַּר אֶחָד בֶּן־בָּקָר אַיִל אֶחָד כֶּֽבֶשׂ־אֶחָד בֶּן־שְׁנָתוֹ לְעֹלָֽה׃

far-'echad-ven-vaqar-'ayil-'echad-khevesh-'echad-ven-shenatvo-le'olah

KJV: One young bullock, one ram, one lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:

AKJV: One young bullock, one ram, one lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:

ASV: one young bullock, one ram, one he-lamb a year old, for a burnt-offering;

YLT: one bullock, a son of the herd, one ram, one lamb, a son of a year, for a burnt-offering;

Exposition: Numbers 7:69 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'One young bullock, one ram, one lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:70

Hebrew

שְׂעִיר־עִזִּים אֶחָד לְחַטָּֽאת׃

she'iyr-'iziym-'echad-lechata't

KJV: One kid of the goats for a sin offering:

AKJV: One kid of the goats for a sin offering:

ASV: one male of the goats for a sin-offering;

YLT: one kid of the goats for a sin-offering;

Exposition: Numbers 7:70 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'One kid of the goats for a sin offering:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:71

Hebrew

וּלְזֶבַח הַשְּׁלָמִים בָּקָר שְׁנַיִם אֵילִם חֲמִשָּׁה עַתֻּדִים חֲמִשָּׁה כְּבָשִׂים בְּנֵֽי־שָׁנָה חֲמִשָּׁה זֶה קָרְבַּן אֲחִיעֶזֶר בֶּן־עַמִּישַׁדָּֽי׃

vlezevach-hashelamiym-vaqar-shenayim-'eylim-chamishah-'atudiym-chamishah-khevashiym-veney-shanah-chamishah-zeh-qarevan-'achiy'ezer-ven-'amiyshaday

KJV: And for a sacrifice of peace offerings, two oxen, five rams, five he goats, five lambs of the first year: this was the offering of Ahiezer the son of Ammishaddai.

AKJV: And for a sacrifice of peace offerings, two oxen, five rams, five he goats, five lambs of the first year: this was the offering of Ahiezer the son of Ammishaddai. ¶

ASV: and for the sacrifice of peace-offerings, two oxen, five rams, five he-goats, five he-lambs a year old: this was the oblation of Ahiezer the son of Ammishaddai.

YLT: and for a sacrifice of the peace-offerings two oxen, five rams, five he-goats, five lambs, sons of a year; this is the offering of Ahiezer son of Ammishaddai.

Exposition: Numbers 7:71 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And for a sacrifice of peace offerings, two oxen, five rams, five he goats, five lambs of the first year: this was the offering of Ahiezer the son of Ammishaddai.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:72

Hebrew

בְּיוֹם עַשְׁתֵּי עָשָׂר יוֹם נָשִׂיא לִבְנֵי אָשֵׁר פַּגְעִיאֵל בָּן־עָכְרָֽן׃

veyvom-'ashetey-'ashar-yvom-nashiy'-liveney-'asher-fage'iy'el-van-'akheran

KJV: On the eleventh day Pagiel the son of Ocran, prince of the children of Asher, offered:

AKJV: On the eleventh day Pagiel the son of Ocran, prince of the children of Asher, offered:

ASV: On the eleventh day Pagiel the son of Ochran, prince of the children of Asher:

YLT: On the eleventh day, the prince of the sons of Asher, Pagiel son of Ocran; --

Exposition: Numbers 7:72 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'On the eleventh day Pagiel the son of Ocran, prince of the children of Asher, offered:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:73

Hebrew

קָרְבָּנוֹ קַֽעֲרַת־כֶּסֶף אַחַת שְׁלֹשִׁים וּמֵאָה מִשְׁקָלָהּ מִזְרָק אֶחָד כֶּסֶף שִׁבְעִים שֶׁקֶל בְּשֶׁקֶל הַקֹּדֶשׁ שְׁנֵיהֶם ׀ מְלֵאִים סֹלֶת בְּלוּלָה בַשֶּׁמֶן לְמִנְחָֽה׃

qarevanvo-qa'arat-khesef-'achat-sheloshiym-vme'ah-misheqalah-mizeraq-'echad-khesef-shive'iym-sheqel-vesheqel-haqodesh-sheneyhem- -mele'iym-solet-velvlah-vashemen-leminechah

KJV: His offering was one silver charger, the weight whereof was an hundred and thirty shekels, one silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a meat offering:

AKJV: His offering was one silver charger, the weight whereof was an hundred and thirty shekels, one silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a meat offering:

ASV: his oblation was one silver platter, the weight whereof was a hundred and thirty shekels, one silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a meal-offering;

YLT: his offering is one silver dish, its weight a hundred and thirty shekels ; one silver bowl of seventy shekels, by the shekel of the sanctuary, both of them full of flour mixed with oil, for a present;

Exposition: Numbers 7:73 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'His offering was one silver charger, the weight whereof was an hundred and thirty shekels, one silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a...'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:74

Hebrew

כַּף אַחַת עֲשָׂרָה זָהָב מְלֵאָה קְטֹֽרֶת׃

khaf-'achat-'asharah-zahav-mele'ah-qetoret

KJV: One golden spoon of ten shekels, full of incense:

AKJV: One golden spoon of ten shekels, full of incense:

ASV: one golden spoon of ten shekels, full of incense;

YLT: one golden spoon of ten shekels , full of perfume;

Exposition: Numbers 7:74 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'One golden spoon of ten shekels, full of incense:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:75

Hebrew

פַּר אֶחָד בֶּן־בָּקָר אַיִל אֶחָד כֶּֽבֶשׂ־אֶחָד בֶּן־שְׁנָתוֹ לְעֹלָֽה׃

far-'echad-ven-vaqar-'ayil-'echad-khevesh-'echad-ven-shenatvo-le'olah

KJV: One young bullock, one ram, one lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:

AKJV: One young bullock, one ram, one lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:

ASV: one young bullock, one ram, one he-lamb a year old, for a burnt-offering;

YLT: one bullock, a son of the herd, one ram, one lamb, a son of a year, for a burnt-offering;

Exposition: Numbers 7:75 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'One young bullock, one ram, one lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:76

Hebrew

שְׂעִיר־עִזִּים אֶחָד לְחַטָּֽאת׃

she'iyr-'iziym-'echad-lechata't

KJV: One kid of the goats for a sin offering:

AKJV: One kid of the goats for a sin offering:

ASV: one male of the goats for a sin-offering;

YLT: one kid of the goats for a sin-offering;

Exposition: Numbers 7:76 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'One kid of the goats for a sin offering:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:77

Hebrew

וּלְזֶבַח הַשְּׁלָמִים בָּקָר שְׁנַיִם אֵילִם חֲמִשָּׁה עַתֻּדִים חֲמִשָּׁה כְּבָשִׂים בְּנֵֽי־שָׁנָה חֲמִשָּׁה זֶה קָרְבַּן פַּגְעִיאֵל בֶּן־עָכְרָֽן׃

vlezevach-hashelamiym-vaqar-shenayim-'eylim-chamishah-'atudiym-chamishah-khevashiym-veney-shanah-chamishah-zeh-qarevan-fage'iy'el-ven-'akheran

KJV: And for a sacrifice of peace offerings, two oxen, five rams, five he goats, five lambs of the first year: this was the offering of Pagiel the son of Ocran.

AKJV: And for a sacrifice of peace offerings, two oxen, five rams, five he goats, five lambs of the first year: this was the offering of Pagiel the son of Ocran. ¶

ASV: and for the sacrifice of peace-offerings, two oxen, five rams, five he-goats, five he-lambs a year old: this was the oblation of Pagiel the son of Ochran.

YLT: and for a sacrifice of the peace-offerings two oxen, five rams, five he-goats, five lambs, sons of a year; this is the offering of Pagiel son of Ocran.

Exposition: Numbers 7:77 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And for a sacrifice of peace offerings, two oxen, five rams, five he goats, five lambs of the first year: this was the offering of Pagiel the son of Ocran.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:78

Hebrew

בְּיוֹם שְׁנֵים עָשָׂר יוֹם נָשִׂיא לִבְנֵי נַפְתָּלִי אֲחִירַע בֶּן־עֵינָֽן׃

veyvom-sheneym-'ashar-yvom-nashiy'-liveney-nafetaliy-'achiyra'-ven-'eynan

KJV: On the twelfth day Ahira the son of Enan, prince of the children of Naphtali, offered:

AKJV: On the twelfth day Ahira the son of Enan, prince of the children of Naphtali, offered:

ASV: On the twelfth day Ahira the son of Enan, prince of the children of Naphtali:

YLT: On the twelfth day, the prince of the sons of Naphtali, Ahira son of Enan; --

Exposition: Numbers 7:78 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'On the twelfth day Ahira the son of Enan, prince of the children of Naphtali, offered:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:79

Hebrew

קָרְבָּנוֹ קֽ͏ַעֲרַת־כֶּסֶף אַחַת שְׁלֹשִׁים וּמֵאָה מִשְׁקָלָהּ מִזְרָק אֶחָד כֶּסֶף שִׁבְעִים שֶׁקֶל בְּשֶׁקֶל הַקֹּדֶשׁ שְׁנֵיהֶם ׀ מְלֵאִים סֹלֶת בְּלוּלָה בַשֶּׁמֶן לְמִנְחָֽה׃

qarevanvo-qa'arat-khesef-'achat-sheloshiym-vme'ah-misheqalah-mizeraq-'echad-khesef-shive'iym-sheqel-vesheqel-haqodesh-sheneyhem- -mele'iym-solet-velvlah-vashemen-leminechah

KJV: His offering was one silver charger, the weight whereof was an hundred and thirty shekels, one silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a meat offering:

AKJV: His offering was one silver charger, the weight whereof was an hundred and thirty shekels, one silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a meat offering:

ASV: his oblation was one silver platter, the weight whereof was a hundred and thirty shekels, one silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a meal-offering;

YLT: his offering is one silver dish, its weight a hundred and thirty shekels ; one silver bowl of seventy shekels, by the shekel of the sanctuary, both of them full of flour mixed with oil, for a present;

Exposition: Numbers 7:79 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'His offering was one silver charger, the weight whereof was an hundred and thirty shekels, one silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a...'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:80

Hebrew

כַּף אַחַת עֲשָׂרָה זָהָב מְלֵאָה קְטֹֽרֶת׃

khaf-'achat-'asharah-zahav-mele'ah-qetoret

KJV: One golden spoon of ten shekels, full of incense:

AKJV: One golden spoon of ten shekels, full of incense:

ASV: one golden spoon of ten shekels, full of incense;

YLT: one golden spoon of ten shekels , full of perfume;

Exposition: Numbers 7:80 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'One golden spoon of ten shekels, full of incense:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:81

Hebrew

פַּר אֶחָד בֶּן־בָּקָר אַיִל אֶחָד כֶּֽבֶשׂ־אֶחָד בֶּן־שְׁנָתוֹ לְעֹלָֽה׃

far-'echad-ven-vaqar-'ayil-'echad-khevesh-'echad-ven-shenatvo-le'olah

KJV: One young bullock, one ram, one lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:

AKJV: One young bullock, one ram, one lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:

ASV: one young bullock, one ram, one he-lamb a year old, for a burnt-offering;

YLT: one bullock, a son of the herd, one ram, one lamb, a son of a year, for a burnt-offering;

Exposition: Numbers 7:81 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'One young bullock, one ram, one lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:82

Hebrew

שְׂעִיר־עִזִּים אֶחָד לְחַטָּֽאת׃

she'iyr-'iziym-'echad-lechata't

KJV: One kid of the goats for a sin offering:

AKJV: One kid of the goats for a sin offering:

ASV: one male of the goats for a sin-offering;

YLT: one kid of the goats for a sin-offering;

Exposition: Numbers 7:82 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'One kid of the goats for a sin offering:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:83

Hebrew

וּלְזֶבַח הַשְּׁלָמִים בָּקָר שְׁנַיִם אֵילִם חֲמִשָּׁה עַתֻּדִים חֲמִשָּׁה כְּבָשִׂים בְּנֵֽי־שָׁנָה חֲמִשָּׁה זֶה קָרְבַּן אֲחִירַע בֶּן־עֵינָֽן׃

vlezevach-hashelamiym-vaqar-shenayim-'eylim-chamishah-'atudiym-chamishah-khevashiym-veney-shanah-chamishah-zeh-qarevan-'achiyra'-ven-'eynan

KJV: And for a sacrifice of peace offerings, two oxen, five rams, five he goats, five lambs of the first year: this was the offering of Ahira the son of Enan.

AKJV: And for a sacrifice of peace offerings, two oxen, five rams, five he goats, five lambs of the first year: this was the offering of Ahira the son of Enan.

ASV: and for the sacrifice of peace-offerings, two oxen, five rams, five he-goats, five he-lambs a year old: this was the oblation of Ahira the son of Enan.

YLT: and for a sacrifice of the peace-offerings two oxen, five rams, five he-goats, five lambs, sons of a year; this is the offering of Ahira son of Enan.

Exposition: Numbers 7:83 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And for a sacrifice of peace offerings, two oxen, five rams, five he goats, five lambs of the first year: this was the offering of Ahira the son of Enan.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:84

Hebrew

זֹאת ׀ חֲנֻכַּת הַמִּזְבֵּחַ בְּיוֹם הִמָּשַׁח אֹתוֹ מֵאֵת נְשִׂיאֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל קַעֲרֹת כֶּסֶף שְׁתֵּים עֶשְׂרֵה מִֽזְרְקֵי־כֶסֶף שְׁנֵים עָשָׂר כַּפּוֹת זָהָב שְׁתֵּים עֶשְׂרֵֽה׃

zo't- -chanukhat-hamizevecha-veyvom-himashach-'otvo-me'et-neshiy'ey-yishera'el-qa'arot-khesef-sheteym-'eshereh-mizereqey-khesef-sheneym-'ashar-khafvot-zahav-sheteym-'eshereh

KJV: This was the dedication of the altar, in the day when it was anointed, by the princes of Israel: twelve chargers of silver, twelve silver bowls, twelve spoons of gold:

AKJV: This was the dedication of the altar, in the day when it was anointed, by the princes of Israel: twelve chargers of silver, twelve silver bowls, twelve spoons of gold:

ASV: This was the dedication of the altar, in the day when it was anointed, by the princes of Israel: twelve silver platters, twelve silver bowls, twelve golden spoons;

YLT: This is the dedication of the altar, in the day of its being anointed, by the princes of Israel: twelve silver dishes, twelve silver bowls, twelve golden spoons;

Exposition: Numbers 7:84 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'This was the dedication of the altar, in the day when it was anointed, by the princes of Israel: twelve chargers of silver, twelve silver bowls, twelve spoons of gold:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:85

Hebrew

שְׁלֹשִׁים וּמֵאָה הַקְּעָרָה הָֽאַחַת כֶּסֶף וְשִׁבְעִים הַמִּזְרָק הָאֶחָד כֹּל כֶּסֶף הַכֵּלִים אַלְפַּיִם וְאַרְבַּע־מֵאוֹת בְּשֶׁקֶל הַקֹּֽדֶשׁ׃

sheloshiym-vme'ah-haqe'arah-ha'achat-khesef-veshive'iym-hamizeraq-ha'echad-khol-khesef-hakheliym-'alefayim-ve'areva'-me'vot-vesheqel-haqodesh

KJV: Each charger of silver weighing an hundred and thirty shekels, each bowl seventy: all the silver vessels weighed two thousand and four hundred shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary:

AKJV: Each charger of silver weighing an hundred and thirty shekels, each bowl seventy: all the silver vessels weighed two thousand and four hundred shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary:

ASV: each silver platterweighinga hundred and thirtyshekels, and each bowl seventy; all the silver of the vessels two thousand and four hundredshekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary;

YLT: a hundred and thirty shekels each silver dish, and each bowl seventy; all the silver of the vessels is two thousand and four hundred shekels , by the shekel of the sanctuary.

Exposition: Numbers 7:85 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'Each charger of silver weighing an hundred and thirty shekels, each bowl seventy: all the silver vessels weighed two thousand and four hundred shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary:'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:86

Hebrew

כַּפּוֹת זָהָב שְׁתֵּים־עֶשְׂרֵה מְלֵאֹת קְטֹרֶת עֲשָׂרָה עֲשָׂרָה הַכַּף בְּשֶׁקֶל הַקֹּדֶשׁ כָּל־זְהַב הַכַּפּוֹת עֶשְׂרִים וּמֵאָֽה׃

khafvot-zahav-sheteym-'eshereh-mele'ot-qetoret-'asharah-'asharah-hakhaf-vesheqel-haqodesh-khal-zehav-hakhafvot-'esheriym-vme'ah

KJV: The golden spoons were twelve, full of incense, weighing ten shekels apiece, after the shekel of the sanctuary: all the gold of the spoons was an hundred and twenty shekels.

AKJV: The golden spoons were twelve, full of incense, weighing ten shekels apiece, after the shekel of the sanctuary: all the gold of the spoons was an hundred and twenty shekels.

ASV: the twelve golden spoons, full of incense, weighingtenshekelsapiece, after the shekel of the sanctuary; all the gold of the spoons a hundred and twentyshekels;

YLT: Golden spoons are twelve, full of perfume; ten shekels each spoon, by the shekel of the sanctuary; all the gold of the spoons is a hundred and twenty shekels ;

Exposition: Numbers 7:86 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'The golden spoons were twelve, full of incense, weighing ten shekels apiece, after the shekel of the sanctuary: all the gold of the spoons was an hundred and twenty shekels.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:87

Hebrew

כָּל־הַבָּקָר לָעֹלָה שְׁנֵים עָשָׂר פָּרִים אֵילִם שְׁנֵים־עָשָׂר כְּבָשִׂים בְּנֵֽי־שָׁנָה שְׁנֵים עָשָׂר וּמִנְחָתָם וּשְׂעִירֵי עִזִּים שְׁנֵים עָשָׂר לְחַטָּֽאת׃

khal-havaqar-la'olah-sheneym-'ashar-fariym-'eylim-sheneym-'ashar-khevashiym-veney-shanah-sheneym-'ashar-vminechatam-vshe'iyrey-'iziym-sheneym-'ashar-lechata't

KJV: All the oxen for the burnt offering were twelve bullocks, the rams twelve, the lambs of the first year twelve, with their meat offering: and the kids of the goats for sin offering twelve.

AKJV: All the oxen for the burnt offering were twelve bullocks, the rams twelve, the lambs of the first year twelve, with their meat offering: and the kids of the goats for sin offering twelve.

ASV: all the oxen for the burnt-offering twelve bullocks, the rams twelve, the he-lambs a year old twelve, and their meal-offering; and the males of the goats for a sin-offering twelve;

YLT: all the oxen for burnt-offering are twelve bullocks, rams twelve, lambs, sons of a year twelve, and their present; and kids of the goats twelve, for sin-offering;

Exposition: Numbers 7:87 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'All the oxen for the burnt offering were twelve bullocks, the rams twelve, the lambs of the first year twelve, with their meat offering: and the kids of the goats for sin offering twelve.'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:88

Hebrew

וְכֹל בְּקַר ׀ זֶבַח הַשְּׁלָמִים עֶשְׂרִים וְאַרְבָּעָה פָּרִים אֵילִם שִׁשִּׁים עַתֻּדִים שִׁשִּׁים כְּבָשִׂים בְּנֵי־שָׁנָה שִׁשִּׁים זֹאת חֲנֻכַּת הַמִּזְבֵּחַ אַחֲרֵי הִמָּשַׁח אֹתֽוֹ׃

vekhol-veqar- -zevach-hashelamiym-'esheriym-ve'areva'ah-fariym-'eylim-shishiym-'atudiym-shishiym-khevashiym-veney-shanah-shishiym-zo't-chanukhat-hamizevecha-'acharey-himashach-'otvo

KJV: And all the oxen for the sacrifice of the peace offerings were twenty and four bullocks, the rams sixty, the he goats sixty, the lambs of the first year sixty. This was the dedication of the altar, after that it was anointed.

AKJV: And all the oxen for the sacrifice of the peace offerings were twenty and four bullocks, the rams sixty, the he goats sixty, the lambs of the first year sixty. This was the dedication of the altar, after that it was anointed.

ASV: and all the oxen for the sacrifice of peace-offerings twenty and four bullocks, the rams sixty, the he-goats sixty, the he-lambs a year old sixty. This was the dedication of the altar, after that it was anointed.

YLT: and all the oxen for the sacrifice of the peace-offerings are twenty and four bullocks, rams sixty, he-goats sixty, lambs, sons of a year, sixty; this is the dedication of the altar, in the day of its being anointed.

Exposition: Numbers 7:88 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And all the oxen for the sacrifice of the peace offerings were twenty and four bullocks, the rams sixty, the he goats sixty, the lambs of the first year sixty. This was the dedication of the altar, after that it was a...'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.

Numbers 7:89

Hebrew

וּבְבֹא מֹשֶׁה אֶל־אֹהֶל מוֹעֵד לְדַבֵּר אִתּוֹ וַיִּשְׁמַע אֶת־הַקּוֹל מִדַּבֵּר אֵלָיו מֵעַל הַכַּפֹּרֶת אֲשֶׁר עַל־אֲרֹן הָעֵדֻת מִבֵּין שְׁנֵי הַכְּרֻבִים וַיְדַבֵּר אֵלָֽיו׃

vvevo'-mosheh-'el-'ohel-mvo'ed-ledaver-'itvo-vayishema'-'et-haqvol-midaver-'elayv-me'al-hakhaforet-'asher-'al-'aron-ha'edut-miveyn-sheney-hakheruviym-vayedaver-'elayv

KJV: And when Moses was gone into the tabernacle of the congregation to speak with him, then he heard the voice of one speaking unto him from off the mercy seat that was upon the ark of testimony, from between the two cherubims: and he spake unto him.

AKJV: And when Moses was gone into the tabernacle of the congregation to speak with him, then he heard the voice of one speaking to him from off the mercy seat that was on the ark of testimony, from between the two cherubim: and he spoke to him.

ASV: And when Moses went into the tent of meeting to speak with him, then he heard the Voice speaking unto him from above the mercy-seat that was upon the ark of the testimony, from between the two cherubim: and he spake unto him.

YLT: And in the going in of Moses unto the tent of meeting to speak with Him--he doth even hear the voice speaking unto him from off the mercy-seat which is upon the ark of the testimony, from between the two cherubs; and He speaketh unto him.

Exposition: Numbers 7:89 emphasizes a key movement in the chapter's argument. In KJV form, the text reads: 'And when Moses was gone into the tabernacle of the congregation to speak with him, then he heard the voice of one speaking unto him from off the mercy seat that was upon the ark of testimony, from between the two cher...'. Read in canonical context, the verse supports the coherence of biblical revelation by linking doctrine, narrative, and covenantal meaning.

Apologetics Notes

• Scientific Correlation: This verse is suitable for cumulative-case reasoning in apologetics: historical context, textual stability, and worldview coherence are evaluated together rather than in isolation.

• Hebrew Grammar: A close Hebrew reading should attend lexical range, clause flow, and discourse function in context; these controls reduce over-reading and preserve authorial intent.

• Historical Evidence: Historically, this verse is interpreted within the received canonical tradition, where manuscript continuity and early community usage support stable transmission and meaning.